This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Perspective on This Article Finasteride and Prostate Cancer: New York Times Article All Versions of this Article: 1940-6207.CAPR-08-0092v1 1940-6207.CAPR-08-0092v2 1/3/174    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Redman, M. W. Articles by Thompson, I. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Redman, M. W. Articles by Thompson, I. M.

Finasteride Does Not Increase the Risk of High-Grade Prostate Cancer: A Bias-Adjusted Modeling Approach

Authors' Affiliations: ¹ Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; ² Department of Pathology, The University of Colorado at Denver, Denver, Colorado; ³ The Southwest Oncology Group; and ⁴ Department of Urology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas

Requests for reprints: Mary W. Redman, Southwest Oncology Group Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, M3-C102, Seattle, WA 98109. Phone: 206-667-4767; Fax: 206-667-4408; E-mail: mredman{at}fhcrc.org.

Finasteride taken for 7 years in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) reduced the risk of prostate cancer by 25%, but with an apparent increased risk of high-grade disease. Subsequent analyses found that finasteride biases toward improved prostate cancer detection and accuracy in prostate cancer grading at biopsy. In our first analysis of the present study, we accounted for these biases in estimating the effect of finasteride on the risk of overall and high-grade prostate cancer. This analysis used PCPT data that included 3-month longer collection of endpoints than in the original report with observed prostate cancer rates of 22.9% (4.8% with high grade; placebo) versus 16.6% (5.8% with high grade; finasteride). Based on these updated results, the bias-adjusted prostate cancer rates are estimated to be 21.1% (4.2% high grade; placebo) and 14.7% (4.8% high grade; finasteride), a 30% risk reduction in prostate cancer [relative risk (RR), 0.70; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.64-0.76; P < 0.0001] and a nonsignificant 14% increase in high-grade cancer (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.96-1.35; P = 0.12) with finasteride. We then estimated rates of high-grade prostate cancer based on an analysis that incorporated grading information from radical prostatectomies in 500 subjects diagnosed with cancer. The resulting estimates were high-grade cancer rates of 8.2% (placebo) versus 6.0% (finasteride), a 27% risk reduction (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.96; P = 0.02) with finasteride. Our third analysis examined the impact of biopsy sensitivity on the relative risk of high-grade prostate cancer and found that differential sensitivity of biopsy between the treatment arms can have a significant impact on risk ratio estimates. These collective results suggest that the observed, unadjusted higher risk of high-grade disease with finasteride seems to have been due to facilitated diagnosis resulting primarily from increased biopsy sensitivity with finasteride. Therefore, men undergoing regular prostate cancer screening or who express an interest in cancer prevention should be informed of the opportunity to take finasteride for preventing prostate cancer.

Key Words: prostate cancer • cancer prevention • finasteride • PSA • inverse probability weighted estimation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Esserman, Y. Shieh, and I. Thompson Rethinking Screening for Breast Cancer and Prostate Cancer JAMA, October 21, 2009; 302(15): 1685 - 1692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Li and J. Kim Molecular Profiles of Finasteride Effects on Prostate Carcinogenesis Cancer Prevention Research, June 1, 2009; 2(6): 518 - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Zanardi, M. Puntoni, M. Maffezzini, R. Bandelloni, M. Mori, A. Argusti, F. Campodonico, L. Turbino, D. Branchi, R. Montironi, et al. Phase I-II Trial of Weekly Bicalutamide in Men with Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen and Negative Prostate Biopsies Cancer Prevention Research, April 1, 2009; 2(4): 377 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. S. Kramer, K. L. Hagerty, S. Justman, M. R. Somerfield, P. C. Albertsen, W. J. Blot, H. Ballentine Carter, J. P. Costantino, J. I. Epstein, P. A. Godley, et al. Use of 5-{alpha}-Reductase Inhibitors for Prostate Cancer Chemoprevention: American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Urological Association 2008 Clinical Practice Guideline J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2009; 27(9): 1502 - 1516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Edwards Finasteride and High-Grade Prostate Cancer Cancer Prevention Research, February 1, 2009; 2(2): 185 - 185. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Lippman, E. A. Klein, P. J. Goodman, M. S. Lucia, I. M. Thompson, L. G. Ford, H. L. Parnes, L. M. Minasian, J. M. Gaziano, J. A. Hartline, et al. Effect of Selenium and Vitamin E on Risk of Prostate Cancer and Other Cancers: The Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) JAMA, January 7, 2009; 301(1): 39 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Klein and I. M. Thompson Current Status of Chemoprevention of Prostate Cancer ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2009; 2009(1): 276 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Lucia Abstract CN01-02: The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial: An update on pathology Cancer Prevention Research, November 1, 2008; 1(7_MeetingAbstracts): CN01-02 - CN01-02.