This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1940-6207.CAPR-08-0024v1 1/1/15    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Blaser, M. J. PubMed Articles by Blaser, M. J.

Understanding Microbe-Induced Cancers

Author's Affiliation: Departments of Medicine and Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, and VA Medical Center, New York, New York

Requests for reprints: Martin J. Blaser, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, OBV A606, New York, NY 10016. Phone: 212-263-6394; Fax: 212-263-3969; E-mail: martin.blaser{at}med.nyu.edu.

	Abstract

TOP Abstract Classification of Oncogenic... Principles of Microbial... Oncogenic Mechanisms Biological Considerations Challenges Facing Cancer... The Future Disclosure of Potential... References

 
Microbes are important causes of human cancers, and our estimation of their significance continues to grow as cancer biology is better dissected. A classification system is proposed that highlights common and proposed microbe-induced pathways toward oncogenesis, with an emphasis on types of targeted cells and host-microbial interactions. The central principlesthat underlie oncogenesis induced by the many diverse microbes and the major mechanisms involved are outlined. The phenomenon of microbe-induced cancers raises a number of important biological questions, the solving of which may inform other fields, including aging and degenerative disorders. Finally, our challenge for the future is to better understand the steps in microbe-induced cancers to optimize both prevention and therapy.

TOP Abstract Classification of Oncogenic... Principles of Microbial... Oncogenic Mechanisms Biological Considerations Challenges Facing Cancer... The Future Disclosure of Potential... References

 
Microbes induce an estimated 20% of all fatal cancers in humans (1), suggesting the tremendous potential of controlling microbe-related processes for cancer prevention. Pathogenic microbes can be indigenous or exogenous (foreign), although distinctions between these two categories may not always be obvious. Many infectious agents induce cancer (2–7), but the following three types of agents account for most known microbe-related cancer cases in humans: human papilloma viruses (HPV; causing anogenital cancers), Helicobacter pylori (gastric cancers), and hepatitis B and C viruses (hepatic cancers; refs. 8–10). The HPVs and hepatitis viruses have provided notable successes of infectious disease control for cancer prevention. A vaccine against infection with HPV-6, HPV-11, HPV-16, and HPV-18 received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for preventing cervical cancer (8). In Taiwan, vaccinating children against hepatitis B dramatically reduced hepatic cancer and has been standard preventive care for over 20 years (11). These are the only two established effective interventions in this field to date, however, and work with H. pylori has illustrated the highly complex nature of particular microbial interactions that have thus far limited the ability of interventions to prevent the cancers they cause.

Although microbes, especially viruses, had long been known to induce cancers in animals (12), our understanding of the extent of this problem in humans began only in recent decades and continues to expand. I predict that microbes will be found to play a much larger role in malignancies than we understand today, involving as yet undiscovered mechanisms and malignancies not yet suspected of any relationship with infection.

For example, many people exposed to the major risk factor for lung cancer, heavy smoking, never develop the disease. Investigations of what determines which heavy smokers do or do not develop lung cancer (and differential risk issues in other cancer settings) have focused on genetic differences among exposed individuals. It is becoming clear, however, that our indigenous microbes, the human microbiome, which consist of mutualistic or pathogenic, transient, or residential microbes (preponderantly bacteria) that normally inhabit the surfaces of human tissues (e.g., the lumen of the gastrointestinal tract), also may play a role in cancer risk because they are part of our metabolism and our very make-up (13–16). Differences in the genes of the microbes we carry, encoding the microbial constituents expressed, and in the microbial products that interact with us (17) may affect differential susceptibility to disease (e.g., affecting hormone homeostasis and downstream cancers; refs. 18, 19). In a parallel fashion, varying exposures to microbial agents could modulate lung cancer risk among hosts of similar smoking status. Therefore, the "microbial" genotype of a host may be as relevant to disease risk as is the host's own "human" genotype (13–16). Underscoring this issue, investigators have just discovered a previously unknown agent called the Merkel cell polyomavirus and evidence of its potential etiologic link with Merkel cell carcinoma, one of the most aggressive forms of skin cancer (20).

In addition to inducing cancer, microbes also may influence the course of an established cancer (or may both induce and influence a particular cancer). Although there may be a fine line between these microbial actions, exploring this distinction may help in developing interventions for treating as well as preventing microbe-associated cancers.

Despite important advances of the past decades, we are still at the early stages of understanding the processes of infection-linked carcinogenesis, and the goal of this report is to highlight some of the major concepts that govern the field. The cancer prevention successes of the hepatitis B and HPV vaccines highlight the importance of translating discoveries on the specific biology, immunology, and epidemiology of an oncogenicmicrobe into new preventive initiatives.

	Classification of Oncogenic Microbes

TOP Abstract Classification of Oncogenic... Principles of Microbial... Oncogenic Mechanisms Biological Considerations Challenges Facing Cancer... The Future Disclosure of Potential... References

 
Many microbes, including viruses, bacteria, and helminths, have been implicated in the causation of cancers, and many more surely will be discovered. Rather than reviewing each of the known agents, this article will develop a schema for classifying oncogenic interactions, both known and those that may be found in the future, with the goal of providing a conceptual framework to better understand and thus facilitate research of microbe-induced cancers. The proposed system includes three major classes of relationships (Fig. 1).

View larger version (11K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Three classes of microbes that induce cancers. Class A microbes induce cancers including lymphomas by targeting immunocytes leading to immunosuppression. This immunosuppression also contributes to the cancer-inducing effects of class B microbes, which include local effects on parenchymal cells and induction of host responses. At present, class B microbes induce the most commonly recognized microbe-associated cancers. Class C microbes are a postulated class in which a microbe produces local effects on epithelial tissues that change the regulation of a systemic operator (e.g., a hormone) that promotes cancer at a distant site. Alternatively and/or in addition, some effect on local indigenous microbiota can cause them to react in a way that affects less local microbiota or tissue operators. A class C process might include deranged enterohepatic estrogen circulation due to altered luminal metabolic activities, with consequent effects on tissues. In addition to inducing cancers, class C microbes could induce degenerative processes in distant tissues (e.g., atherosclerosis and neurodegeneration).

I postulate the existence of a third group, or class C agents, with local effects that can lead to either distant or other local effects. For example, H. pylori–induced development of atrophic gastritis could lead to repopulation with microbiota that are toxic to gastric tissue and directly oncogenic, or microbiome-induced disturbances in hormonal regulation could lead to cancers distant from the locus of the change. Although no well-established models for class C phenomena have yet been proved, the metabolic activities of the indigenous colonic microbiota potentially could provide a relevant example. Estrogens undergo an enterohepatic circulation, and the estrogen conjugates are substrates for the colonic microbiota (18, 19, 24,25). For example, perturbations in the complex ongoing metabolism of estrogens could promote the risk of cancers in hormonally responsive tissues such as of the breast, ovary, and endometrium (26–30). Either the blooming or suppression of a particular indigenous organism possessing a critical metabolic activity could change the substrates entering host metabolic pathways. Parallel phenomena involving androgens could promote testicular cancers, which are increasing in incidence (31, 32). The documented relationships between body size, height, and testicular cancer (33, 34) could be mediated by changes in the indigenous microbiota (35). Another potential example of proposed class C–associated phenomena is the markedly increased risk in postmodern societies of esophageal adenocarcinoma (36), which has a clear environmental etiology. Alterations of the acidity or microbiome of the esophagus (37) due to changes in the gastric microbiome (38) could be potential mechanisms for the increased cancer risk (9). As a final note, local changes may influence inflammation at a distant site, with malignant and nonmalignant ("degenerative") consequences.

All of the recognized microbial agents certainly do not fit neatly into this system of class A, B, and C agents. As noted above, some microbes promote the development of more than one type of cancer (e.g., hepatitis C virus, H. pylori, and HIV; Table 1). The discovery of new agents and mechanisms also may expand this system. However, this classification system provides an initial framework for understanding the types of interactions that do and can occur. Heretofore, the field has tended to approach oncogenic microbial interactions on a case-by-case basis. Thinking about them more systematically not only may advance our understanding but also could facilitate the development of effective interventions against microbe-induced cancers.

	Principles of Microbial Oncogenesis

TOP Abstract Classification of Oncogenic... Principles of Microbial... Oncogenic Mechanisms Biological Considerations Challenges Facing Cancer... The Future Disclosure of Potential... References

 
Although the microbial agents and tumors they promote are quite varied, several principles are conserved and can be used to guide future considerations. First, oncogenic microbes generally persist in their hosts for long periods (years or longer). Acute infections may be resolved but also may leave scars that promote neoplasia. This process seems to be exceptional, however. Much more common are persisting microbes that the host cannot eliminate and which engage the host in an ongoing battle that damages tissues (14) and promotes malignancy. For example, squamous cell carcinomas follow the long-term inflammatory consequences of chronic osteomyelitis with sinus tract formation. A group of colonizing organisms rather than a single pathogen has been recognized as provoking this chronic inflammation. Second, variation in oncogenic potential exists within a microbial species. This variation has been well established for HPV, certain types of which cause most cancers, and for the hepatitis viruses and H. pylori, in which particular genotypes are most virulent (39–42). Third, microbial load often matters, as illustrated by the hepatitis viruses (41, 42) and schistosomes. Fourth, the interactions between microbial genotype and load may be synergistic, leading to markedly enhanced disease risks (43, 44). Fifth, host genotypes and phenotypes (e.g., host age and age on acquiring an organism) are part of the microbial genotype-load interaction and modulate risk (40, 45–47). Sixth, because microbes are communicable agents, their prevalence in individuals in a prior generation influences their prevalence in the next. Therefore, secular trends toward intergenerational amplification (of prevalence or virulence) can develop in a population without any known increase in exposure, in contrast to chemical carcinogenesis, for example.

	Oncogenic Mechanisms

TOP Abstract Classification of Oncogenic... Principles of Microbial... Oncogenic Mechanisms Biological Considerations Challenges Facing Cancer... The Future Disclosure of Potential... References

 
The array of mechanisms under which microbes become oncogenic can be categorized within four general processes: direct effects on signal transduction pathways in host cells, chronic inflammation, changes in host physiology, and effects on other microbes. These processes are not exclusive because many important microbial agents are known to have several mechanisms belonging to more than one process. An example of the first process (signal transduction pathways) is microbes that invade cells that ultimately are sloughed, which often have a selective advantage if they can delay turnover of the host cell. Microbial promotion of cell longevity could involve inhibition of apoptosis via effects on p53 (2, 3), up-regulation of cell cyclins (48), or effects on stroma (49). The second process, chronic inflammation, promotes neoplasia per se through many mechanisms (50) including increased host cell turnover that increase the probability of mutagenic events and genotoxic effects of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species stemming from inflammation (2, 3, 17). The third process, changes in host physiology due to microbes and the host responses they promote, can occur at a tissue, organ, or cellular level (18, 28, 51). Phenomena such as immunosuppression, hormonal perturbation,and effects on motility in organs where flow is critical are examples of these physiologic changes. The fourth process, microbes affecting other microbes, can involve any and all of the previously described processes and mechanisms. For example, as cited above, multidecade gastric H. pylori colonization often leads to atrophic gastritis, which (besides possibly directly promoting oncogenesis) permits new microbial populations to enter the stomach and play critical roles in the oncogenic process initiated by H. pylori. In other words, H. pylori may be allowing other genotoxic microbes to invade by facilitating long-term pathophysiologic changes in gastric epithelial biology.

	Biological Considerations

TOP Abstract Classification of Oncogenic... Principles of Microbial... Oncogenic Mechanisms Biological Considerations Challenges Facing Cancer... The Future Disclosure of Potential... References

 
Context is all-important in biology in general and with respect to host-microbial relationships in particular. Rather than being fixed, these relationships may exist within a probability envelope. The important context for microbial oncogenesis is provided by other environmental factors (e.g., aflatoxin exposure); the host's age, experiences (e.g., parity), and genotype; and, as we now are beginning to consider, the microbiome genotype. The most consistent and universal factor in this group is host age. Cancer is generally a disease of aging in which rate increases are log linear with each decade of life (52). In this sense, cancer is part of the biological clock that limits human life span, but it ticks differently for men and women.

If microbes are an important part of human cancers, then they also must be a cog in this biological clock. For example, gastric cancer, for which the fraction attributable to H. pylori is 80%, has a strong male predominance (53). The curve of age-specific rate increases for women parallels that for men, but is shifted 15 to 20 years later (53, 54). Paralleling the pattern in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, women also have a number of extra years of protection from gastric cancer. Therefore, H. pylori–induced progressive aging of the stomach leading to oncogenesis is gender-specific. As life span increases for women and men, cancer rates predictably also will increase, and a proportion of the increased cancers will be due to microbes. A better understanding of host-microbial relationships with regard to selection, symbiosis, and parasitism (14) will facilitate improved microbe-induced cancer prevention and treatment.

That certain cancers run in families usually is ascribed to host genes but also could involve the intra-familial transmission of microbes with particular genotypes. Transmission within families occurs for many indigenous organisms (14) and can resemble inheritance patterns (55). Furthermore, whether a microbe is acquired from a family member (and so is preadapted to the next host) or from a genetically unrelated stranger could modify the risk of a disease that may present clinically decades later (46).

	Challenges Facing Cancer Preventive Interventions

TOP Abstract Classification of Oncogenic... Principles of Microbial... Oncogenic Mechanisms Biological Considerations Challenges Facing Cancer... The Future Disclosure of Potential... References

 
Cancer prevention is generally highly complex, and there is no guarantee that a strong knowledge base can make it any simpler. For an exogenous agent such as HPV, a vaccination program provides considerable benefit with essentially no known biological cost (8). For organisms within the human microbiome such as H. pylori (13), however, the situation is much more complex. An H. pylori vaccine would seem to be beneficial, but H. pylori is deeply interconnected with human physiology (17), and increasing evidence indicates that persons without this microbe have new disease costs including childhood asthma (56) and diseases of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction, which can lead to adenocarcinoma (9, 57).

If preventing infection is not optimal, then what about eradicating the microbe after infection? Numerous opportunities exist for eradicating H. pylori (e.g., with a relatively short course of antibiotics) during the several-decade-long pathogenesis of H. pylori–induced gastric cancer. Eradication on a mass basis, too early, and without good biomarkers, however, may have a high cost [e.g., increased risks of childhood asthma (56) and diseases of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (9, 57)] in relation to the cancer prevention benefits that are realized decades later (58). The nonspecific effects of antibiotics also highlight the advantage of specificity that vaccines (such as the HPV and hepatitis B vaccines) can have. If eradication is done too late, the point of no return for cancer risk may have passed in many individuals (59). Stratifying populations (60) and developing biomarkers that accurately predict risk (39, 61) are critical to resolving this dilemma.

A third intervention approach is palliation with antioxidants (for example) to lessen the host-microbe interaction. The track record of this approach in diminishing H. pylori–induced gastric cancer is mixed (62–64), however, and its specificity is low. In conclusion, it is clear that we must improve our knowledge base to develop creative and ultimately specific, personalized approaches for preventing microbe-induced cancers.

	The Future

TOP Abstract Classification of Oncogenic... Principles of Microbial... Oncogenic Mechanisms Biological Considerations Challenges Facing Cancer... The Future Disclosure of Potential... References

 
The multistep nature of microbial oncogenesis (Fig. 2) provides ample opportunities for interventions to mitigate the process and prevent cancer. The best strategy is to prevent infection by preventing exposure to oncogenic agents. Important elements of this strategy include recognizing new agents of potential concern and then preventing exposures to them, either natural or the sometimes very important iatrogenic exposures due to injections and the use of blood and tissue products. Infection also can be prevented by developing vaccines against oncogenic microbes and deploying them to persons at risk before exposure. The HPV and hepatitis B vaccines are examples of specific immune enhancements for cancer prevention.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Pathogenesis of microbe-induced malignancies and opportunities for intervention. Microbial exposure may lead to infection, which then can lead to long-term, frequently asymptomatic carriage of the microbe with subsequent host responses, progression to premalignant lesions, and finally to cancer. Numerous points in this sequence offer opportunities for interventions (dashed lines) designed to lessen exposure, infection, or the consequences of infection.

Accomplishing these goals will require a much better understanding of microbial oncogenesis. Progress in the field will require better clinical diagnostics to identify specific agents, specific microbial genotypes, specific host genotypes, and other critical factors of the host-microbe interaction (61, 66, 67). To eliminate the tendency for certain persistent microbes to push toward malignancies, we will need new pharmacologic approaches based on a better understanding of host-microbe interactions. Certain indigenous organisms are symbionts during early life and may be pathogenic in older age, when eliminating these organisms could improve human health. An example of this phenomenon may be H. pylori (9, 56, 57), which also could be germane to other commensal bacteria and viruses. Probiotics ("good microbes") or prebiotics (dietary supplements as substrates to promote the growth of probiotic microbes) could be used pharmacologically to help prevent or ameliorate infections by pathogenic organisms. Improving the understanding of our microbiome should lead to developing better barriers against generally circulating pathogens and to eliminating host-specific pathogens.

The dynamic nature of microbe-induced cancer biology is reflected, in part, by the now frequent discovery of new putative agents (20). Many of the issues outlined in this report are global challenges confronting the prevention of all types of cancers, regardless of etiology. It is certain, however, that following the biology of microbe-induced cancers to understand the microbial actors and their cellular and tissue targets will lead to developing new clinical tools for preventing and treating these cancers. It is hoped that the concepts presented here will enhance our ability to follow this biology.

	Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

TOP Abstract Classification of Oncogenic... Principles of Microbial... Oncogenic Mechanisms Biological Considerations Challenges Facing Cancer... The Future Disclosure of Potential... References

 
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Received for publication January 2, 2008. Accepted January 30, 2008

	References

TOP Abstract Classification of Oncogenic... Principles of Microbial... Oncogenic Mechanisms Biological Considerations Challenges Facing Cancer... The Future Disclosure of Potential... References

 

1. Parkin DM. The global health burden of infection-associated cancers in the year 2002. Int J Cancer 2006;118:3030–44.[CrossRef][Medline]

2. Butel J. Viral carcinogenesis: revelation of molecular mechanisms and etiology of human disease. Carcinogenesis 2000;21:405–26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Oliviera DE. DNA viruses in human cancer: an integrated overview on fundamental mechanisms of viral carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett 2007;247:182–96.[CrossRef][Medline]

4. Watanapa P Watanapa WB. Liver fluke-associated cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2002;89:962–70.[CrossRef][Medline]

5. Hinuma Y, Nagata K, Hanaoka M et al . Adult T-cell leukemia: antigen in an ATL cell line and detection of antibodies to the antigen in human sera. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 1981;78:6476–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Yoshida M, Miyoshi I, Hinuma Y. Isolation and characterization of retrovirus from cell lines of human T-cell leukemia and its implication in the disease. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 1982;79:2031–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Goedert JJ, Cole TR, Virgo P et al . Spectrum of AIDS-associated malignant disorders. Lancet 1998;351:1833–9.[CrossRef][Medline]

8. Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J, Rodriguez AC, Wacholder S. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet 2007;370:890–907.[CrossRef][Medline]

9. Peek RM Blaser MJ. Helicobacter pylori and gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinomas. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:28–37.[CrossRef][Medline]

10. Raza SA, Clifford GM, Franceschi S. Worldwide variation in the relative importance of Razahepatitis B and C viruses in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. Br J Cancer 2007;96:1127–34.[CrossRef][Medline]

11. Chang MH, Chen CJ, Lai MS et al . Universal hepatitis B vaccination in Taiwan and the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in children. Taiwan Childhood Hepatoma Study Group. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1855–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Rous P. Transmission of a malignant new growth by means of a cell-free filtrate. J Am Med Assoc 1911;56:198.

13. Blaser MJ. Who are we? Indigenous microbes and the ecology of human diseases. EMBO Rep 2006;7:956–60.[CrossRef][Medline]

14. Blaser MJ Kirschner D. The equilibria that permit bacterial persistence in human hosts. Nature 2007;449:843–9.[CrossRef][Medline]

15. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature 2006;444:1027–31.[CrossRef][Medline]

16. Dethlefsen L, McFall-Ngai M, Relman DA. An ecological and evolutionary perspective on human-microbial mutualism and disease. Nature 2007;449:811–8.[CrossRef][Medline]

17. Blaser MJ Atherton J. Helicobacter pylori persistence: biology and disease. J Clin Invest 2004;113:321–33.[CrossRef][Medline]

18. Tikkanen MJ, Adlercreutz H, Pulkkinen MO. Effects of antibiotics on oestrogen metabolism. Br Med J 1973;2:369.[Medline]

19. Adlercreutz H, Martin F, Pulkkinen M et al . Intestinal metabolism of estrogens. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 1976;43:497–505.[Abstract]

20. Feng H, Shuda M, Chang Y, Moore PS. Clonal integration of a polyomavirus in human Merkel cell carcinoma. Science Epub 2008.

21. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Schistosomes, liver flukes, and Helicobacter pylori. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum 1994;61:1–241.[Medline]

22. Giordano TP, Henderson L, Landgren O et al . Risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and lymphoproliferative precursor diseases in US veterans with hepatitis C virus. JAMA 2007;297:2010–17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Parsonnet J, Hansen S, Rodriguez L et al . Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1267–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Lewis SJ, Heaton KW, Oakey RE, McGarrigle HH. Lower serum oestrogen concentrations associated with faster intestinal transit. Br J Cancer 1997;76:395–400.[Medline]

25. Setchell KD, Lawson AM, Borriello SP et al . Lignan formation in man—microbial involvement and possible roles in relation to cancer. Lancet 1981;2:4–7.[CrossRef][Medline]

26. Yager JD Liehr JG. Molecular mechanisms of estrogen carcinogenesis. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1996;36:203–32.[CrossRef][Medline]

27. Missimer SA, Eliassen AH, Barbieri RL, Hankinson SE. Endogenous estrogen, androgen, and progesterone concentration and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1856–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Rossini A, Rumio C, Sfondrini L et al . Influence of antibiotic treatment on breast carcinoma development in proto-neu transgenic mice. Cancer Res 2006;66:6219–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Knekt P, Adlercreutz H, Rissanen H, Aromaa A, Teppo L, Heliovaara M. Does antibacterial treatment for urinary tract infection contribute to the risk of breast cancer? Br J Cancer 2000;82:1107–10.[CrossRef][Medline]

30. Velicer CM, Heckbert SR, Lampe JW, Potter JD, Robertson CA, Taplin SH. Antibiotic use in relation to the risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2004;291:827–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Bergstrom R, Adami HO, Mohner M et al . Increase in testicular cancer incidence in six European countries: a birth cohort phenomenon. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:727–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. McKiernan JM, Goluboff ET, Liberson GL et al . Rising risk of testicular cancer by birth cohort in the United States from 1973-1995. J Urol 1999;162:361–3.[CrossRef][Medline]

33. Rassmussen F, Gunnell D, Ekbom A et al . Birth weight, adult height, and testicular cancer: cohort study of 337,249 Swedish young men. Cancer Causes Control 2003;14:595–8.[CrossRef][Medline]

34. McGlynn KA, Sakoda LC, Rubertone MV et al . Body size, dairy consumption, puberty, and risk of testicular germ cell tumors. Am J Epidemiol 2007;165:355–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Beard A Blaser MJ. The ecology of height. Perspect Biol Med 2002;45:475–98.[CrossRef][Medline]

36. Pohl H Welch HG. The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:142–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Pei Z, Bini EJ, Yang L, Zhou M, Francois F, Blaser MJ. Bacterial biota in the human distal esophagus. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 2004;101:4250–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Bik EM, Eckburg PB, Gill SR et al . Molecular analysis of the bacterial microbiota in the human stomach. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:732–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Figueiredo C, Machado JC, Pharoah P et al . Helicobacter pylori and interleukin 1 genotyping: an opportunity to identify high-risk individuals for gastric carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002;94:1680–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Bruno S, Crosignani A, Maisonneuve P, Rossi S, Silini E, Mondelli MU. Hepatitis C virus genotype 1b as a major risk factor associated with hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a seventeen-year prospective cohort study. Hepatology 2007;46:1350–6.[CrossRef][Medline]

41. Yu M-W, Yeh S-H, Chen P-J et al . Hepatitis B virus genotype and DNA level and hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study in men. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:265–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Sun C-A, Wu D-M, Lin C-C et al . Incidence and cofactors of hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study of 12,008 men in Taiwan. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:674–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Wu H-C, Wang Q, Wang L-W et al . Urinary 8-oxodeoxyguanosine, aflatoxin B₁ exposure and hepatitis B virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan. Carcinogenesis 2007;28:995–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

44. Castle PE, Jeronimo J, Schiffman M et al . Age-related changes of the cervix influence human papillomavirus type distribution. Cancer Res 2006;66:1218–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Chang YJ, Wu MS, Lin JT, Pestell RG, Blaser MJ, Chen CC. Mechanisms for Helicobacter pylori CagA-induced cyclin D1 expression that affect cell cycle. Cell Microbiol 2006;8:1740–52.[CrossRef][Medline]

46. Blaser MJ, Nomura A, Lee J, Stemmerman GN, Perez-Perez GI. Early life family structure and microbially-induced cancer risk. PLoS Med 2007;4:53–8.[CrossRef]

47. Hsieh C, Tzonou A, Zavitsanos X, Kaklamani E, Lan S, Trichopoulos D. Age at first establishment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection and hepatocellular carcinoma risk. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136:1115–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Chang YJ, Wu MS, Lin JT, Peslell RG, Blaser MJ, Chen CC. Mechanisms in Helicobacter pylori CagA-induced cyclin D1 expression that affect cell cycle. Cell Microbiol 2006;8:1740–52.[CrossRef][Medline]

49. Pillinger MH, Marjanovic N, Kim S-Y et al . Helicobacter pylori stimulates gastric epithelial cell MMP-1 secretion via CagA-dependent and independent ERK activation. J Biol Chem 2007;282:18722–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

50. Medzhitov R. Recognition of microorganisms and activation of the immune response. Nature 2007;449:819–26.[CrossRef][Medline]

51. Francois F, Roper J, Groodman A et al . The association of gastric leptin with esophageal inflammation and metaplasia. Gut 2008;57:16–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

52. Ries LAG, Devesa SS, Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF. Cancer incidence, mortality, and patient survival in the United States. Cancer epidemiology and prevention, 3rd ed. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.; 2006, p. 139–67.

53. Sipponen P, Hyvarinen H, Seppala K, Blaser MJ. Pathogenesis of the transformation from gastritis to malignancy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998;12: (Supplement 1)61–72.[CrossRef][Medline]

54. Sipponen P Correa P. Delayed rise in incidence of gastric cancer in females results in unique sex ratio (M/F) pattern: etiologic hypothesis. Gastric Cancer 2002;5:213–9.[CrossRef][Medline]

55. Raymond J, Thiberge J-M, Chevalier C et al . Genetic and transmission analysis of Helicobacter pylori strains within a family. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:1816–21.[Medline]

56. Chen Y Blaser MJ. Inverse associations of Helicobacter pylori with asthma and allergies. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:821–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

57. Nyren O Blot WJ. Helicobacter pylori infection: mainly foe but also friend?. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:1432–4.[Free Full Text]

58. Lee Y-C, Lin J-T, Wu H-M et al . Cost-effectiveness analysis between primary and secondary preventive strategies for cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:875–85.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

59. Wong BC, Lam SK, Wong WM et al . Helicobacter pylori eradication to prevent gastric cancer in a high-risk region of China: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;291:187–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

60. Parsonnet J, Harris RA, Hack HM, Owens DK. Modeling cost-effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori screening to prevent gastric cancer: a mandate for clinical trials. Lancet 1996;348:150–4.[CrossRef][Medline]

61. Plummer M, van Doorn LJ, Franceschi S et al . Helicobacter pylori cytotoxin-associated genotype and gastric precancerous lesions. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:1328–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

62. Correa P, Fontham ET, Bravo JC et al . Chemoprevention of gastric dysplasia: randomized trial of antioxidant supplements and anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1881–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

63. You WC, Brown LM, Zhang L et al . Randomized double-blind factorial trial of three treatments to reduce the prevalence of precancerous gastric lesions. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:974–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

64. Plummer M, Vivas J, Lopez G et al . Chemoprevention of precancerous gastric lesions with antioxidant vitamin supplementation: a randomized trial in a high-risk population. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:137–46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

65. Blaser MJ Kirschner D. Dynamics of Helicobacter pylori colonization in relation to the host response. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:8359–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

66. Mayrand M-H, Duarte-Franco E, Rodrigues I et al . Human papillomavirus DNA versus papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;257:1579–88.

67. Nomura AMY, Lee J, Stemmerman G, Nomura RY, Perez-Perez GI, Blaser MJ. Helicobacter pylori cagA seropositivity and gastric carcinoma risk in a Japanese American population. J Infect Dis 2002;186:1138–44.[CrossRef][Medline]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1940-6207.CAPR-08-0024v1 1/1/15    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Blaser, M. J. PubMed Articles by Blaser, M. J.