Advertisement
Research Article

Metabolic Obesity, Adipose Inflammation and Elevated Breast Aromatase in Women with Normal Body Mass Index

Neil M. Iyengar, Kristy A. Brown, Xi Kathy Zhou, Ayca Gucalp, Kotha Subbaramaiah, Dilip D. Giri, Heba Zahid, Priya Bhardwaj, Nils K. Wendel, Domenick J. Falcone, Hanhan Wang, Samantha Williams, Michael Pollak, Monica Morrow, Clifford A. Hudis and Andrew J. Dannenberg
DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-16-0314 Published April 2017

Abstract

Obesity is associated with breast white adipose tissue (WAT) inflammation, elevated levels of the estrogen biosynthetic enzyme, aromatase, and systemic changes that have been linked to the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Here, we determined whether metabolic obesity, including changes in breast biology and systemic effects, occurs in a subset of women with normal body mass index (BMI). Breast WAT and fasting blood were collected from 72 women with normal BMI (<25 kg/m2) undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer risk reduction or treatment. WAT inflammation was defined by the presence of crown-like structures of the breast (CLS-B) which are composed of dead or dying adipocytes surrounded by macrophages. Severity of inflammation was measured as CLS-B/cm2. The primary objective was to determine whether breast WAT inflammation is associated with aromatase expression and activity. Secondary objectives included assessment of circulating factors and breast adipocyte size. Breast WAT inflammation was present in 39% of women. Median BMI was 23.0 kg/m2 (range, 18.4–24.9 kg/m2) in women with breast WAT inflammation versus 21.8 kg/m2 (range, 17.3–24.6 kg/m2) in those without inflammation (P = 0.04). Breast WAT inflammation was associated with elevated aromatase expression and activity, which increased with severity of inflammation (P < 0.05). Breast WAT inflammation correlated with larger adipocytes (P = 0.01) and higher circulating levels of C-reactive protein, leptin, insulin, and triglycerides (P ≤ 0.05). A subclinical inflammatory state associated with elevated aromatase in the breast, adipocyte hypertrophy, and systemic metabolic dysfunction occurs in some normal BMI women and may contribute to the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Cancer Prev Res; 10(4); 235–43. ©2017 AACR.

See related article by Berger, p. 223–25.

Introduction

Obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2 or greater, is a risk factor for the development of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women (1, 2). After breast cancer diagnosis, obesity is associated with increased risk of relapse and decreased overall survival across all breast tumor subtypes (3–6). We previously reported an inflammatory state in breast white adipose tissue (WAT) that occurs in the majority of women with elevated BMI and is associated with increased levels of aromatase, the rate-limiting enzyme for estrogen biosynthesis (7–10). Aromatase is a key pharmacologic target for both breast cancer prevention and treatment, and its local expression in breast WAT is thought to drive the growth of tumors in postmenopausal women. Importantly, we and others have reported that breast WAT inflammation is associated with worse prognosis for patients with breast cancer including shortened time to recurrence and worse overall survival (10, 11). The existence of breast WAT inflammation in cancer-free women suggests that its presence could also contribute to the development of cancer (12).

Inflammation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of obesity-associated disorders that promote the growth of breast cancer (13–21). These include insulin resistance and other conditions grouped together as the metabolic syndrome, for example, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and fasting hyperglycemia (22). Several clinical trials involving energy balance, that is, dietary modification and/or physical activity, or pharmacological targeting of metabolic pathways that are commonly deregulated in the setting of elevated BMI, have been undertaken to attenuate the effects of obesity on breast cancer risk and mortality (23–30).

Currently, BMI is the most commonly used measure of obesity in clinical trials that aim to mitigate its negative impact on cancer risk and progression. However, metabolic syndrome disorders that are classically associated with elevated BMI have been reported to occur in a subset of individuals with a normal BMI (31, 32). When found in individuals with a normal BMI, these disorders are collectively termed metabolic obesity in normal weight (33, 34) and as such, misclassification of cardiometabolic health and risk of cardiometabolic diseases occurs when using BMI categories (35). Considering that breast WAT inflammation is also found in a subset of women with normal BMI (9), the same is likely to occur when assessing cancer risk. Thus, the public health impact of obesity on cancer risk and mortality may be far greater than originally anticipated by conventional BMI categories.

Aside from known inherited germline syndromes, the etiology of breast cancer in normal BMI individuals is not well-understood. We hypothesized that breast WAT inflammation could reflect a metabolically obese state and a contributing cause of breast cancer despite normal BMI. Accordingly, we investigated whether breast WAT inflammation impacts aromatase levels in the breasts of women with normal BMI. We also investigated whether breast WAT inflammation in normal BMI women correlates with circulating metabolic and inflammatory factors implicated in the pathogenesis and progression of breast cancer.

Materials and Methods

Study design

Women considered to be normal weight by World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (BMI < 25 kg/m2) and who were undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer risk reduction or treatment at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC; New York, NY) were eligible. Height and weight were recorded on the day of surgery and used to calculate BMI. Patients with known BRCA mutations were not eligible. At the time of surgery, non-tumor containing breast WAT and fasting blood samples were prospectively collected. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of MSKCC, Weill Cornell Medical College (New York, NY), and Monash Health (Victoria, Australia).

Data and tissue collection

Clinicopathologic data were abstracted from the electronic medical record (EMR). Menopausal status was categorized as either premenopausal or postmenopausal on the basis of National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria (36). Diagnoses of co-morbidities including diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were recorded if documented in the EMR by the treating physician. Tumor subtype was classified as ER and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive if >1% staining by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was reported. Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) was categorized as positive or negative if IHC 3+ or FISH amplification ≥ 2.0 (37).

For each subject, paraffin blocks and snap-frozen samples were prepared from breast WAT not involved by tumor on the day of mastectomy. Frozen samples were stored in the presence or absence of RNAlater (Ambion). A 30-mL fasting blood sample was obtained preoperatively on the day of surgery. Blood was separated into serum and plasma by centrifugation within 3 hours of collection and stored at −80°C.

WAT inflammation

Consistent with established methods, the presence or absence of breast WAT inflammation was determined by histologic assessment (7, 9, 10). Breast WAT inflammation was defined by the presence of crown-like structures of the breast (CLS-B), which are composed of a dead or dying adipocyte surrounded by CD68-positive macrophages (7, 9, 10, 38). From each patient, 5 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks were prepared, and 1 section per FFPE block (5-μm-thick and ∼2 cm in diameter) was generated such that 5 sections were stained for CD68, a macrophage marker (mouse monoclonal KP1 antibody; Dako; dilution 1:4,000). Immunostained tissue sections were examined by the study pathologist (D.D. Giri) using light microscopy to detect the presence or absence of CLS-B and record the number of CLS-B per slide. Digital photographs of each slide were generated, and WAT area was measured with Image J Software (NIH, Bethesda, MD). The severity of WAT inflammation was quantified as number of CLS-B per square centimeter of WAT (CLS-B/cm2).

Adipocyte measurement

Two hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) sections were generated from FFPE breast tissue to measure adipocyte diameters as previously described (7, 9). The H&E sections were photographed at 20× using an Olympus BX50 microscope and MicroFire digital camera (Optronics). Mean diameters were calculated using measurements from 30 or more individual adipocytes for each patient using the linear dimensional tool in the Canvas 11 Software (ACD Systems International, Inc.).

Quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was isolated from frozen breast tissue using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). One hundred nanograms of RNA was reverse-transcribed using the qScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (QuantaBio). The resulting cDNA was used for amplification. GAPDH was used as an endogenous normalization control. Primers used were: CD68, forward 5′-GCTACATGGCGGTGGAGTACAA-3′ and reverse: 5′-ATGATGAGAGGCAGCAAGATGG-3′; aromatase, forward: 5′-CACATCCTCAATACCAGGTCC-3′ and reverse: 5′-CAGAGATCCAGACTCGCATG-3′; GAPDH, forward: 5′-TTCTTTTGCGTCGCCAGCCGA-3′ and reverse: 5′-GTGACCAGGCGCCCAATACGA-3′. Real-time PCR was conducted using Fast SYBR green PCR master mix on a 7500 HT real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems), with expression determined using the ΔΔCT analysis protocol.

Aromatase activity and quantification

Microsomes were prepared from non-tumorous breast tissue lysates. Aromatase activity was quantified by measurement of the tritiated water released from 1β-[3H] androstenedione (Perkin-Elmer Life Science; ref. 39). Aromatase activity was normalized to protein concentration and expressed as femtomoles per microgram of protein per hour.

To measure the levels of aromatase protein, tissue lysates were prepared from frozen non-tumorous breast tissue samples. Microsomal protein was isolated from tissue lysates using differential centrifugation. The microsomal suspension was subjected to immunoprecipitation with antisera to aromatase (anti-aromatase #677 mouse monoclonal antibody; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; ref. 40) followed by Western blotting (8). Protein levels of housekeeping gene β-actin were assessed from whole-tissue lysates by Western blotting.

Aromatase was also quantified in adipose stromal cells by immunofluorescence as previously described (41). Immunofluorescence was performed using anti-aromatase #677 mouse monoclonal antibody (dilution 1:500), anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 546 (Invitrogen, dilution 1:750), and Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen, dilution 1:2,000). Imaging was performed using the Nikon inverted confocal microscope and perinuclear immunoreactivity quantified using Metamorph software (Molecular Devices).

Blood assays

Plasma levels of leptin, adiponectin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), IL-6 (R&D Systems), and insulin (Mercodia) were measured by ELISA. Glucose levels were measured using the EnzyChrom Glucose Assay Kit (BioAssay Systems). Serum lipids including total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides were measured in the clinical chemistry laboratory at MSKCC. Intra-assay coefficients of variation for quality control samples were less than 7%.

Biostatistical analyses

For continuous variables, the differences between patients with versus without breast WAT inflammation were examined using the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Severity of breast WAT inflammation was examined as a continuous variable and categorically using median number of CLS-B/cm2 (0.29) among subjects with CLS-B as follows: no inflammation (CLS-B absent), mild inflammation (≤0.29 CLS-B/cm2), and severe inflammation (>0.29 CLS-B/cm2). Associations between a categorical variable and the severity of inflammation categories were examined using the χ2 or Fisher exact test where appropriate. To examine relationships between 2 continuous variables, the Spearman correlation was used. Differences in a continuous variable across multiple categories were examined using the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test. For circulating factors measured in 2 batches, the association between the level of a circulating factor and a covariate was examined using multiple linear regression analysis while adjusting for potential batch effects. Levels of a circulating factor were log-transformed where appropriate to ensure the underlying model assumption was satisfied. For all analyses, statistical significance was set at 2-tailed P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted using R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

Results

Study population

A total of 72 women with normal BMI were enrolled between January 2011 and August 2013. Breast WAT inflammation (Fig. 1A) was present in 39% of participants. Baseline characteristics stratified by the presence or absence of breast WAT inflammation are shown in Table 1. Overall, median BMI was 21.9 kg/m2 (range, 17.3–24.9 kg/m2) and was higher in women with breast WAT inflammation (P = 0.04).

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Elevated BMI and breast WAT inflammation are associated with increased aromatase expression in the breast. A, H&E (left) and anti-CD68 immunostaining (right) showing CLS-B (200×). B, Higher BMI correlates with elevated aromatase mRNA levels in breast tissue (ρ = 0.28, P = 0.02). C, Breast WAT inflammation is associated with higher breast aromatase expression (P = 0.01). D, Increasing severity of breast WAT inflammation, measured as CLS-B/cm2, correlates with higher breast aromatase mRNA levels (ρ = 0.35, P < 0.01). E, CD68 expression in breast tissue positively correlates with breast aromatase expression (ρ = 0.54, P < 0.01).

View this table:
Table 1.

Baseline characteristics stratified by breast WAT inflammation

Breast WAT inflammation and aromatase

Levels of aromatase mRNA in breast tissue positively correlated with BMI within the normal range (ρ = 0.28, P = 0.02; Fig. 1B). Women with breast WAT inflammation had higher breast aromatase mRNA levels than those without inflammation (P = 0.01; Fig. 1C). Higher breast aromatase expression correlated with increasing severity of breast WAT inflammation (ρ = 0.35, P < 0.01; Fig. 1D). A positive correlation between aromatase and CD68 mRNA levels in the breast was also observed (ρ = 0.54, P < 0.001; Fig. 1E). The correlations between breast aromatase mRNA levels and breast WAT inflammation were stronger than with BMI. Furthermore, women with breast WAT inflammation had higher aromatase protein levels and enzyme activity in the breast than women without inflammation (Fig. 2A and B). In addition, aromatase immunoreactivity was detected in breast adipose stromal cells (Fig. 2C and D). Women with breast WAT inflammation had higher aromatase average staining intensity in breast adipose stromal cells than those without inflammation (P = 0.03; Fig. 2E), which increased with severity of breast WAT inflammation (P < 0.05; Fig. 2F).

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Women with breast WAT inflammation have higher aromatase protein levels and greater enzyme activity in the breast. A, Levels of aromatase protein assessed by Western blot analysis (n = 6/group) are higher in women with breast WAT inflammation. B, Aromatase activity is higher in inflamed than uninflamed breast tissue (P < 0.01). Columns, means; bars, SD, n = 6/group. C and D, Representative confocal images demonstrating aromatase (red) staining in adipose stromal cells from patients without breast WAT inflammation (C) and with inflammation (D). Arrows indicate adipose stromal cells. Scale bars,10 μm; Hoechst 33342 nuclear stain (blue). E, Aromatase average staining intensity in adipose stromal cells is significantly higher in patients with breast WAT inflammation versus without inflammation [P = 0.03; n = 19 (breast WAT inflammation absent), 12 (breast WAT inflammation present)]. F, Aromatase average staining intensity is increased with severity of inflammation [P < 0.05; n = 19 (no inflammation), 6 (mild), 6 (severe)]. Asterisks denote effects that are significantly different. IF, immunofluorescence.

Adipocyte hypertrophy, breast WAT inflammation, and aromatase

Women with breast WAT inflammation had larger average adipocyte diameters (103.6 ± 13.1 μ) than women without inflammation (94.3 ± 13.8 μ, P = 0.01; Fig. 3A). In addition, breast adipocyte diameter correlated with the severity of breast WAT inflammation (ρ = 0.36, P = 0.003; Fig. 3B), and the largest adipocytes were found in those with severe inflammation (Fig. 3C). Larger adipocyte size correlated with higher aromatase mRNA levels in the breast (ρ = 0.33, P = 0.006; Fig. 3D).

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Adipocyte hypertrophy is present in women with breast WAT inflammation and adipocyte size correlates with increasing severity of inflammation and aromatase expression. A, Average adipocyte diameters are larger in women with breast WAT inflammation versus without inflammation (P = 0.01). B, Average adipocyte diameter positively correlates with severity of breast WAT inflammation (ρ = 0.36, P < 0.01). C, Women with severe breast WAT inflammation had the largest breast adipocytes (P = 0.01). D, Average adipocyte diameter positively correlates with breast aromatase mRNA level (ρ = 0.33; P < 0.01).

Circulating factors, breast WAT inflammation, and aromatase

Circulating factors measured in fasted blood are presented in Table 2 and are stratified by the presence or absence of breast WAT inflammation. Breast WAT inflammation was associated with elevated circulating levels of hsCRP (P = 0.05), leptin (P = 0.01), insulin (P = 0.02), and triglycerides (P < 0.01). Of note, breast WAT inflammation was associated with a clinical diagnosis of dyslipidemia (P < 0.01; Table 1). Breast WAT inflammation was also associated with insulin resistance (P < 0.01) as evidenced by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR, Table 2). In addition, circulating levels of leptin were positively correlated with adipocyte size (P < 0.01; Fig. 4A), severity of breast WAT inflammation (P = 0.01; Fig. 4B), and aromatase expression (P = 0.02; Fig. 4C).

View this table:
Table 2.

Measured blood factors stratified by breast WAT inflammation

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Circulating levels of leptin positively correlate with adipocyte size, breast WAT inflammation, and aromatase expression. A, Blood leptin levels correlate with average adipocyte size (P < 0.01). B, Circulating leptin levels correlate with severity of breast WAT inflammation (P = 0.01). C, Blood leptin levels correlate with aromatase expression in the breast (P = 0.02).

Discussion

Findings from this study establish the presence of an inflammatory state that can occur in the breasts of women with normal BMI. This subclinical condition includes (i) WAT inflammation defined by the presence of CLS-B, (ii) increased aromatase expression and activity in the breast, and (iii) systemic metabolic dysfunction. In addition, the presence of adipocyte hypertrophy in normal BMI women with breast WAT inflammation suggests a dysmorphic body composition, that is, hyperadiposity despite normal BMI. Collectively, these findings identify a population of women with normal BMI but underlying pathophysiology associated with the development and progression of breast cancer.

Our findings support the role of breast WAT inflammation and associated metabolic obesity in breast cancer development and growth for some normal BMI women. We previously reported that breast WAT inflammation is present in approximately 90% of patients with BMI > 30 kg/m2 and is associated with activation of NF-κB, a transcription factor that induces expression of proinflammatory mediators, and increased levels of aromatase (7–9). Furthermore, women with breast WAT inflammation have increased circulating levels of proinflammatory mediators as well as insulin resistance and dyslipidemia—which confer increased risk and poorer survival for breast cancer (10, 13, 17, 18, 21). In the current study, we found that the presence of breast WAT inflammation in normal BMI individuals is indicative of increased aromatase locally and systemic alterations that mirror the pathophysiology typically associated with elevated BMI. Consistent with these biologic alterations, breast WAT inflammation is associated with shortened survival, independent of BMI, in patients with breast cancer (10, 11).

Although we found a correlation between breast aromatase expression and BMI within the normal range, the strength of correlation was stronger between aromatase and severity of breast WAT inflammation. Given that CD68-expressing macrophages makeup CLS-B, we compared CD68 and aromatase expression in the breast and again found that aromatase expression correlated more strongly with CD68 than BMI. Notably, the majority of women in this study were premenopausal, a group in which elevated BMI has not been shown to increase breast cancer risk. Our findings in these normal BMI women may help explain the inadequacy of BMI for cancer risk assessment, particularly in premenopausal women.

Findings in blood link metabolic obesity in normal weight to a breast microenvironment supportive of tumor growth. Macrophage infiltration and inflammation of abdominal subcutaneous WAT have been reported to occur in metabolically obese normal weight individuals (42). Consistently, women with breast WAT inflammation had biochemical changes characteristic of the metabolic syndrome including higher levels of insulin and triglycerides despite having a normal BMI. Furthermore, these normal-weight women with breast WAT inflammation had higher circulating levels of hsCRP, a cardiovascular risk factor. Because a variety of proinflammatory mediators are known inducers of aromatase (43, 44), it is possible that these mediators are contributing to the observed increase in aromatase. Moreover, elevated levels of hsCRP and insulin are each associated with increased breast cancer risk in normal BMI individuals (19, 20). In addition, circulating levels of the adipocyte-secreted hormone, leptin, were increased in normal BMI women with breast WAT inflammation. In addition to stimulating cancer cell proliferation and survival (45), leptin has been shown to regulate aromatase in adipose stromal cells (44). Here, we found increased aromatase in breast adipose stromal cells of women with WAT inflammation. Supporting these findings, higher circulating levels of leptin correlated with increased aromatase expression in the breast. Leptin levels are elevated in the setting of hyperadiposity (46). We found breast adipocyte hypertrophy in women with elevated leptin levels, suggesting hyperadipose body composition despite a normal BMI. These women with larger breast adipocytes also had greater aromatase expression in the breast. Thus, breast WAT inflammation in normal BMI individuals is indicative of a hyperadipose state, including higher circulating leptin levels, and increased aromatase in the breast. Measurement of body composition, for example, via radiographic techniques, may provide more accurate cancer risk assessment and prognostication for normal BMI individuals and additional studies are needed. Furthermore, quantification of fat mass could identify normal weight patients who may benefit from interventions aimed at attenuating the impact of obesity on cancer risk and progression.

Local production of estrogens in the breasts of women with WAT inflammation may contribute to the development and progression of estrogen-dependent tumors. Consistently, the majority of women in this study had ER-positive tumors; however, the incidence was not higher in women with breast WAT inflammation. It is plausible that the impact of local inflammation and estrogen production on hormone receptor–positive tumor development is more substantial in postmenopausal women, when ovarian estrogen biosynthesis has ceased. Consistently, 50% of postmenopausal women with normal BMI had breast WAT inflammation compared with 35% of premenopausal women. These findings are consistent with our prior report in which we demonstrate that the postmenopausal state is independently associated with breast WAT inflammation (9). In light of these observations, additional studies are needed to examine local aromatase expression and circulating markers in postmenopausal women. It is also likely that breast WAT inflammation and its associated systemic alterations promote tumors via hormone-dependent and -independent mechanisms. For example, WAT inflammation in the tongue confers shortened disease-specific survival for patients with early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue, a disease that is not thought to be hormonally regulated (47). Insulin can stimulate the synthesis of insulin-like growth factor 1 and both can activate the PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Ras/Raf/MAPK pathways which are linked to breast tumor progression (48–50). Thus the presence of WAT inflammation is likely to stimulate multiple pathways that contribute to tumor development and growth.

In conclusion, this study identifies a population of metabolically obese normal weight women with inflammation and increased aromatase in the breast. Additional studies are needed to develop clinically feasible methods to identify this vulnerable population. Such methods could include body composition assessment and the development of blood biomarker signatures that accurately identify patients with WAT inflammation. This potentially high-risk population that is often thought to be healthy by visual inspection warrants further study to determine whether interventions typically offered to anthropometrically obese individuals will reduce breast cancer risk and mortality.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: N.M. Iyengar, K.A. Brown, X.K. Zhou, A. Gucalp, C.A. Hudis, A.J. Dannenberg

Development of methodology: N.M. Iyengar, K.A. Brown, A. Gucalp, H. Zahid, A.J. Dannenberg

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): N.M. Iyengar, K.A. Brown, A. Gucalp, K. Subbaramaiah, D.D. Giri, P. Bhardwaj, N.K. Wendel, D.J. Falcone, M. Pollak, M. Morrow, C.A. Hudis, A.J. Dannenberg

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): N.M. Iyengar, K.A. Brown, X.K. Zhou, K. Subbaramaiah, H. Wang, M. Pollak, C.A. Hudis, A.J. Dannenberg

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: N.M. Iyengar, K.A. Brown, X.K. Zhou, A. Gucalp, K. Subbaramaiah, D.D. Giri, N.K. Wendel, M. Pollak, M. Morrow, C.A. Hudis, A.J. Dannenberg

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): N.M. Iyengar, K.A. Brown, X.K. Zhou, A. Gucalp, N.K. Wendel, S. Williams, C.A. Hudis, A.J. Dannenberg

Study supervision: N.M. Iyengar, K.A. Brown, S. Williams, A.J. Dannenberg

Other (performed IF, confocal imaging, and analyzed data): H. Zahid

Grant Support

This work was supported by grants and contracts NIH/NCIHHSN2612012000181 (to A.J. Dannenberg), Prevent Cancer Foundation (to A.J. Dannenberg), NIH/NCIU54 CA210184-01 (to A.J. Dannenberg and N.M. Iyengar), Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (to N.M. Iyengar), the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (to N.M Iyengar, C.A. Hudis, and A.J. Dannenberg), NIH/NCIR01 CA185293 (to A.J. Dannenberg), the Botwinick-Wolfensohn Foundation (in memory of Mr. and Mrs. Benjamin Botwinick; to A.J. Dannenberg), Myrna and Bernard Posner (to N.M. Iyengar and C.A. Hudis), the National Breast Cancer Foundation ECF-16-004 (to K.A. Brown), the NHMRCGNT1061800 (to K.A. Brown), the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Support Grant/Core Grant (P30 CA008748), and the Victorian Government Operational Infrastructure Support Program.

Footnotes

  • Note: This work was presented in part at the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

  • Received December 8, 2016.
  • Revision received January 25, 2017.
  • Accepted February 4, 2017.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Trentham-Dietz A,
    2. Newcomb PA,
    3. Storer BE,
    4. Longnecker MP,
    5. Baron J,
    6. Greenberg ER,
    7. et al.
    Body size and risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1997;145:1011–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Iyengar NM,
    2. Hudis CA,
    3. Dannenberg AJ
    . Obesity and cancer: local and systemic mechanisms. Annu Rev Med 2015;66:297–309.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Calle EE,
    2. Rodriguez C,
    3. Walker-Thurmond K,
    4. Thun MJ
    . Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1625–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Ewertz M,
    2. Jensen MB,
    3. Gunnarsdottir KA,
    4. Hojris I,
    5. Jakobsen EH,
    6. Nielsen D,
    7. et al.
    Effect of obesity on prognosis after early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:25–31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Protani M,
    2. Coory M,
    3. Martin JH
    . Effect of obesity on survival of women with breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;2010:23.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sparano JA,
    2. Zhao F,
    3. Martino S,
    4. Ligibel JA,
    5. Perez EA,
    6. Saphner T,
    7. et al.
    Long-term follow-up of the E1199 phase III trial evaluating the role of taxane and schedule in operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:2353–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Morris PG,
    2. Hudis CA,
    3. Giri D,
    4. Morrow M,
    5. Falcone DJ,
    6. Zhou XK,
    7. et al.
    Inflammation and increased aromatase expression occur in the breast tissue of obese women with breast cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2011;4:1021–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Subbaramaiah K,
    2. Morris PG,
    3. Zhou XK,
    4. Morrow M,
    5. Du B,
    6. Giri D,
    7. et al.
    Increased levels of COX-2 and prostaglandin E2 contribute to elevated aromatase expression in inflamed breast tissue of obese women. Cancer Discov 2012;2:356–65.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Iyengar NM,
    2. Morris PG,
    3. Zhou XK,
    4. Gucalp A,
    5. Giri D,
    6. Harbus MD,
    7. et al.
    Menopause is a determinant of breast adipose inflammation. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2015;8:349–58.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Iyengar NM,
    2. Zhou XK,
    3. Gucalp A,
    4. Morris PG,
    5. Howe LR,
    6. Giri DD,
    7. et al.
    Systemic correlates of white adipose tissue inflammation in early-stage breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2016;22:2283–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Koru-Sengul T,
    2. Santander AM,
    3. Miao F,
    4. Sanchez LG,
    5. Jorda M,
    6. Gluck S,
    7. et al.
    Breast cancers from black women exhibit higher numbers of immunosuppressive macrophages with proliferative activity and of crown-like structures associated with lower survival compared to non-black Latinas and Caucasians. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016;158:113–26.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Sun X,
    2. Casbas-Hernandez P,
    3. Bigelow C,
    4. Makowski L,
    5. Joseph Jerry D,
    6. Smith Schneider S,
    7. et al.
    Normal breast tissue of obese women is enriched for macrophage markers and macrophage-associated gene expression. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;131:1003–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Olefsky JM,
    2. Glass CK
    . Macrophages, inflammation, and insulin resistance. Annu Rev Physiol 2010;72:219–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Rosen ED,
    2. Spiegelman BM
    . What we talk about when we talk about fat. Cell 2014;156:20–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Monteiro R,
    2. Azevedo I
    . Chronic inflammation in obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Mediators Inflamm 2010;2010. pii: 289645.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Berrino F,
    2. Villarini A,
    3. Traina A,
    4. Bonanni B,
    5. Panico S,
    6. Mano MP,
    7. et al.
    Metabolic syndrome and breast cancer prognosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014;147:159–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Goodwin PJ,
    2. Ennis M,
    3. Pritchard KI,
    4. Trudeau ME,
    5. Koo J,
    6. Madarnas Y,
    7. et al.
    Fasting insulin and outcome in early-stage breast cancer: results of a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:42–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Duggan C,
    2. Irwin ML,
    3. Xiao L,
    4. Henderson KD,
    5. Smith AW,
    6. Baumgartner RN,
    7. et al.
    Associations of insulin resistance and adiponectin with mortality in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:32–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Gunter MJ,
    2. Wang T,
    3. Cushman M,
    4. Xue X,
    5. Wassertheil-Smoller S,
    6. Strickler HD,
    7. et al.
    Circulating adipokines and inflammatory markers and postmenopausal breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015;107. pii: djv169.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Gunter MJ,
    2. Xie X,
    3. Xue X,
    4. Kabat GC,
    5. Rohan TE,
    6. Wassertheil-Smoller S,
    7. et al.
    Breast cancer risk in metabolically healthy but overweight postmenopausal women. Cancer Res 2015;75:270–4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Erickson K,
    2. Patterson RE,
    3. Flatt SW,
    4. Natarajan L,
    5. Parker BA,
    6. Heath DD,
    7. et al.
    Clinically defined type 2 diabetes mellitus and prognosis in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:54–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Alberti KG,
    2. Eckel RH,
    3. Grundy SM,
    4. Zimmet PZ,
    5. Cleeman JI,
    6. Donato KA,
    7. et al.
    Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes federation task force on epidemiology and prevention; national heart, lung, and blood institute; american heart association; world heart federation; international atherosclerosis society; and international association for the study of obesity. Circulation 2009;120:1640–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Campbell KL,
    2. Foster-Schubert KE,
    3. Alfano CM,
    4. Wang CC,
    5. Wang CY,
    6. Duggan CR,
    7. et al.
    Reduced-calorie dietary weight loss, exercise, and sex hormones in postmenopausal women: randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:2314–26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Demark-Wahnefried W,
    2. Morey MC,
    3. Sloane R,
    4. Snyder DC,
    5. Miller PE,
    6. Hartman TJ,
    7. et al.
    Reach out to enhance wellness home-based diet-exercise intervention promotes reproducible and sustainable long-term improvements in health behaviors, body weight, and physical functioning in older, overweight/obese cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:2354–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Chlebowski RT,
    2. Blackburn GL,
    3. Thomson CA,
    4. Nixon DW,
    5. Shapiro A,
    6. Hoy MK,
    7. et al.
    Dietary fat reduction and breast cancer outcome: interim efficacy results from the Women's Intervention Nutrition Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:1767–76.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Pierce JP,
    2. Natarajan L,
    3. Caan BJ,
    4. Parker BA,
    5. Greenberg ER,
    6. Flatt SW,
    7. et al.
    Influence of a diet very high in vegetables, fruit, and fiber and low in fat on prognosis following treatment for breast cancer: the Women's Healthy Eating and Living (WHEL) randomized trial. JAMA 2007;298:289–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Garwood ER,
    2. Kumar AS,
    3. Baehner FL,
    4. Moore DH,
    5. Au A,
    6. Hylton N,
    7. et al.
    Fluvastatin reduces proliferation and increases apoptosis in women with high grade breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;119:137–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Higgins MJ,
    2. Prowell TM,
    3. Blackford AL,
    4. Byrne C,
    5. Khouri NF,
    6. Slater SA,
    7. et al.
    A short-term biomarker modulation study of simvastatin in women at increased risk of a new breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012;131:915–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Jiralerspong S,
    2. Palla SL,
    3. Giordano SH,
    4. Meric-Bernstam F,
    5. Liedtke C,
    6. Barnett CM,
    7. et al.
    Metformin and pathologic complete responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in diabetic patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:3297–302.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Goodwin PJ,
    2. Parulekar WR,
    3. Gelmon KA,
    4. Shepherd LE,
    5. Ligibel JA,
    6. Hershman DL,
    7. et al.
    Effect of metformin vs placebo on weight and metabolic factors in NCIC CTG MA.32. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015;107. pii: djv006.
  31. 31.↵
    1. Chen S,
    2. Chen Y,
    3. Liu X,
    4. Li M,
    5. Wu B,
    6. Li Y,
    7. et al.
    Insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome in normal-weight individuals. Endocrine 2014;46:496–504.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Deepa M,
    2. Papita M,
    3. Nazir A,
    4. Anjana RM,
    5. Ali MK,
    6. Narayan KM,
    7. et al.
    Lean people with dysglycemia have a worse metabolic profile than centrally obese people without dysglycemia. Diabetes Technol Ther 2014;16:91–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Ruderman N,
    2. Chisholm D,
    3. Pi-Sunyer X,
    4. Schneider S
    . The metabolically obese, normal-weight individual revisited. Diabetes 1998;47:699–713.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  34. 34.↵
    1. St-Onge MP,
    2. Janssen I,
    3. Heymsfield SB
    . Metabolic syndrome in normal-weight Americans: new definition of the metabolically obese, normal-weight individual. Diabetes Care 2004;27:2222–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Tomiyama AJ,
    2. Hunger JM,
    3. Nguyen-Cuu J,
    4. Wells C
    . Misclassification of cardiometabolic health when using body mass index categories in NHANES 2005–2012. Int J Obes (Lond) 2016;40:883–6.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology v.2.2011; 2011 [cited December 5, 2016]. Available from: www.nccn.org.
  37. 37.↵
    1. Wolff AC,
    2. Hammond ME,
    3. Hicks DG,
    4. Dowsett M,
    5. McShane LM,
    6. Allison KH,
    7. et al.
    Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:3997–4013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Cinti S,
    2. Mitchell G,
    3. Barbatelli G,
    4. Murano I,
    5. Ceresi E,
    6. Faloia E,
    7. et al.
    Adipocyte death defines macrophage localization and function in adipose tissue of obese mice and humans. J Lipid Res 2005;46:2347–55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Subbaramaiah K,
    2. Hudis C,
    3. Chang SH,
    4. Hla T,
    5. Dannenberg AJ
    . EP2 and EP4 receptors regulate aromatase expression in human adipocytes and breast cancer cells. Evidence of a BRCA1 and p300 exchange. J Biol Chem 2008;283:3433–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Sasano H,
    2. Edwards DP,
    3. Anderson TJ,
    4. Silverberg SG,
    5. Evans DB,
    6. Santen RJ,
    7. et al.
    Validation of new aromatase monoclonal antibodies for immunohistochemistry: progress report. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2003;86:239–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. kConFab Lo C,
    2. Simpson ER,
    3. et al.
    1. Wang X,
    2. Docanto MM,
    3. Sasano H
    ; kConFab Lo C, Simpson ER, et al. Prostaglandin E2 inhibits p53 in human breast adipose stromal cells: a novel mechanism for the regulation of aromatase in obesity and breast cancer. Cancer Res 2015;75:645–55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Moreno-Indias I,
    2. Oliva-Olivera W,
    3. Omiste A,
    4. Castellano-Castillo D,
    5. Lhamyani S,
    6. Camargo A,
    7. et al.
    Adipose tissue infiltration in normal-weight subjects and its impact on metabolic function. Transl Res 2016;172:6–17.e3.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    1. Zhao Y,
    2. Agarwal VR,
    3. Mendelson CR,
    4. Simpson ER
    . Estrogen biosynthesis proximal to a breast tumor is stimulated by PGE2 via cyclic AMP, leading to activation of promoter II of the CYP19 (aromatase) gene. Endocrinology 1996;137:5739–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Brown KA,
    2. McInnes KJ,
    3. Hunger NI,
    4. Oakhill JS,
    5. Steinberg GR,
    6. Simpson ER
    . Subcellular localization of cyclic AMP-responsive element binding protein-regulated transcription coactivator 2 provides a link between obesity and breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Cancer Res 2009;69:5392–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Chang CC,
    2. Wu MJ,
    3. Yang JY,
    4. Camarillo IG,
    5. Chang CJ
    . Leptin-STAT3-G9a signaling promotes obesity-mediated breast cancer progression. Cancer Res 2015;75:2375–86.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Friedman JM,
    2. Halaas JL
    . Leptin and the regulation of body weight in mammals. Nature 1998;395:763–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Iyengar NM,
    2. Ghossein RA,
    3. Morris LG,
    4. Zhou XK,
    5. Kochhar A,
    6. Morris PG,
    7. et al.
    White adipose tissue inflammation and cancer-specific survival in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue. Cancer 2016;122:3794–802.
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.↵
    1. Gallagher EJ,
    2. LeRoith D
    . The proliferating role of insulin and insulin-like growth factors in cancer. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2010;21:610–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Belardi V,
    2. Gallagher EJ,
    3. Novosyadlyy R,
    4. LeRoith D
    . Insulin and IGFs in obesity-related breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2013;18:277–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Novosyadlyy R,
    2. Lann DE,
    3. Vijayakumar A,
    4. Rowzee A,
    5. Lazzarino DA,
    6. Fierz Y,
    7. et al.
    Insulin-mediated acceleration of breast cancer development and progression in a nonobese model of type 2 diabetes. Cancer Res 2010;70:741–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Metabolic Obesity, Adipose Inflammation and Elevated Breast Aromatase in Women with Normal Body Mass Index
Neil M. Iyengar, Kristy A. Brown, Xi Kathy Zhou, Ayca Gucalp, Kotha Subbaramaiah, Dilip D. Giri, Heba Zahid, Priya Bhardwaj, Nils K. Wendel, Domenick J. Falcone, Hanhan Wang, Samantha Williams, Michael Pollak, Monica Morrow, Clifford A. Hudis and Andrew J. Dannenberg
Cancer Prev Res April 1 2017 (10) (4) 235-243; DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-16-0314
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Advertisement