<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org">
<title>Cancer Prevention Research current issue</title>
<link>http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org</link>
<description>Cancer Prevention Research RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1940-6215</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>June 2008</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Cancer Prevention Research</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1940-6207</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/4?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/9?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/12?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/15?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/21?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/32?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/39?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/45?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/56?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/65?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Cancer Prevention Research</title>
<url>http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[]]></title>
<link>http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lippman, S. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0051</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>3</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Letter from the Editor</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/4?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sporadic Aberrant Crypt Foci Are Not a Surrogate Endpoint for Colorectal Adenoma Prevention]]></title>
<link>http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/4?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lance, P., Hamilton, S. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0043</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sporadic Aberrant Crypt Foci Are Not a Surrogate Endpoint for Colorectal Adenoma Prevention]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>8</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Perspective</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/9?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical Prevention of Recurrence of Colorectal Adenomas by the Combination of Difluoromethylornithine and Sulindac: An Important Milestone]]></title>
<link>http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/9?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sporn, M. B., Hong, W. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0049</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical Prevention of Recurrence of Colorectal Adenomas by the Combination of Difluoromethylornithine and Sulindac: An Important Milestone]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>11</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Perspective</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/12?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Oral Cavity as a Molecular Mirror of Lung Carcinogenesis]]></title>
<link>http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/12?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sidransky, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0093</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Oral Cavity as a Molecular Mirror of Lung Carcinogenesis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>14</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Perspective</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/15?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding Microbe-Induced Cancers]]></title>
<link>http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/15?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Microbes are important causes of human cancers, and our estimation of their significance continues to grow as cancer biology is better dissected. A classification system is proposed that highlights common and proposed microbe-induced pathways toward oncogenesis, with an emphasis on types of targeted cells and host-microbial interactions. The central principlesthat underlie oncogenesis induced by the many diverse microbes and the major mechanisms involved are outlined. The phenomenon of microbe-induced cancers raises a number of important biological questions, the solving of which may inform other fields, including aging and degenerative disorders. Finally, our challenge for the future is to better understand the steps in microbe-induced cancers to optimize both prevention and therapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blaser, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0024</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding Microbe-Induced Cancers]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>20</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Commentary</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/21?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Aberrant Crypt Foci in the Adenoma Prevention with Celecoxib Trial]]></title>
<link>http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/21?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Aberrant crypt foci (ACF) are the earliest visible neoplastic lesions in the colorectum. The natural history of these lesions and their role in the adenoma-carcinoma sequence are unknown. We studied ACF in a subset of patients randomized to placebo (<I>n</I> = 17), celecoxib (200 mg twice daily; <I>n</I> = 15), or celecoxib (400 mg twice daily; <I>n</I> = 13) in the Adenoma Prevention with Celecoxib (APC) trial. Magnification chromoendoscopy was done to identify, count, and biopsy ACF within the rectum at baseline and after 8 to 12 months of treatment. A total of 655 ACF were identified in 45 patients. We examined 70 of these ACF histologically, and all 70 were nondysplastic. Cohort characteristics and APC trial treatment results for substudy patients were similar to those of the overall APC trial. There was no significant modulation of ACF by celecoxib (versus placebo; <I>P</I> = 0.77). Immunohistochemical comparison of ACF with adjacent normal mucosa showed that ACF had an increased proliferative index as determined by Ki-67 (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001), but lacked other features of neoplasia such as increased cyclooxygenase-2 expression and microvessel density, nuclear localization of &beta;-catenin, or decreased expression of the tumor suppressors SMAD4, Estrogen Receptor ,&nbsp;or&nbsp;MGMT. Only baseline SMAD4 expression in ACF correlated with posttreatment adenoma recurrence (independent of treatment arm; <I>P</I> = 0.01). The presence or number of nondysplastic ACF did not correlate with a higher risk of synchronous advanced or recurrent adenomas. Our overall results indicated that nondysplastic ACF were not accurate surrogate endpoint biomarkers of recurrent colorectal adenomas in the APC trial.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cho, N. L., Redston, M., Zauber, A. G., Carothers, A. M., Hornick, J., Wilton, A., Sontag, S., Nishioka, N., Giardiello, F. M., Saltzman, J. R., Gostout, C., Eagle, C. J., Hawk, E. T., Bertagnolli, M. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-07-0011</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Aberrant Crypt Foci in the Adenoma Prevention with Celecoxib Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>31</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/32?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Difluoromethylornithine Plus Sulindac for the Prevention of Sporadic Colorectal Adenomas: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial]]></title>
<link>http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/32?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Preclinical studies of chemoprevention drugs given in combination at low doses show remarkable efficacy in preventing adenomas with little additional toxicities, suggesting a strategy to improve risk to benefit ratios for preventing recurrent adenomas. Three hundred seventy-five patients with history of resected (&ge;3 mm) adenomas were randomly assigned to receive oral difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) 500 mg and sulindac 150 mg once daily or matched placebos for 36 months, stratified by use of low-dose aspirin (81 mg) at baseline and clinical site. Follow-up colonoscopy was done 3 years after randomization or off-study. Colorectal adenoma recurrence was compared among the groups with log-binomial regression. Comparing the outcome in patients receiving placebos to those receiving active intervention, (<I>a</I>) the recurrence of one or more adenomas was 41.1% and 12.3% (risk ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.49; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001); (<I>b</I>) 8.5% had one or more advanced adenomas, compared with 0.7% of patients (risk ratio, 0.085; 95% confidence interval, 0.011-0.65; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001); and (<I>c</I>) 17 (13.2%) patients had multiple adenomas (&gt;1) at the final colonoscopy, compared with 1 (0.7%; risk ratio, 0.055; 0.0074-0.41; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001). Serious adverse events (grade &ge;3) occurred in 8.2% of patients in the placebo group, compared with 11% in the active intervention group (<I>P</I> = 0.35). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients reporting hearing changes from baseline. Recurrent adenomatous polyps can be markedly reduced by a combination of low oral doses of DFMO and sulindac and with few side effects.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meyskens, F. L., McLaren, C. E., Pelot, D., Fujikawa-Brooks, S., Carpenter, P. M., Hawk, E., Kelloff, G., Lawson, M. J., Kidao, J., McCracken, J., Albers, C. G., Ahnen, D. J., Turgeon, D. K., Goldschmid, S., Lance, P., Hagedorn, C. H., Gillen, D. L., Gerner, E. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0042</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Difluoromethylornithine Plus Sulindac for the Prevention of Sporadic Colorectal Adenomas: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>38</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>32</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/39?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Oral Epithelium as a Surrogate Tissue for Assessing Smoking-Induced Molecular Alterations in the Lungs]]></title>
<link>http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/39?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The lungs and oral cavity of smokers are exposed to tobacco carcinogens. We hypothesized that tobacco-induced molecular alterations in the oral epithelium are similar to those in the lungs, and thus the oral epithelium may be used as a surrogate tissue for assessing alterations in the lungs. We used methylation-specific PCR to analyze promoter methylation of the <I>p16</I> and <I>FHIT</I> genes at baseline and 3 months after intervention in 1,774 oral and bronchial brush specimens from 127 smokers enrolled in a randomized placebo-controlled chemoprevention trial. The association between methylation patterns in oral tissues and bronchial methylation indices (methylated sites / total sites per subject) was analyzed in a blinded fashion. At baseline, promoter methylation in bronchial tissue was present in 23% of samples for <I>p16</I>, 17% for <I>FHIT</I>, and 35% for <I>p16</I> and <I>FHIT</I>; these percentages were comparable to methylation in oral tissue: 19% (<I>p16</I>), 15% (<I>FHIT</I>), and 31% (<I>p16</I> and <I>FHIT</I>). Data from both oral and bronchial tissues were available for 125 individuals, in whom the two sites correlated strongly with respect to alterations (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001 for both <I>p16</I> and <I>FHIT</I>). At baseline, the mean bronchial methylation index was far higher in patients with oral tissue methylation (in either of the two genes; 39 patients) than in patients without oral tissue methylation (86 patients): 0.53 &plusmn; 0.29 versus 0.27 + 0.26 methylation index (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001). Similar correlations occurred at 3 months after intervention. Our results support the potential of oral epithelium as a surrogate tissue for assessing tobacco-induced molecular damage in the lungs and thus have important implications for designing future lung cancer prevention trials and for research into the risk and early detection of lung cancer.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bhutani, M., Pathak, A. K., Fan, Y.-H., Liu, D. D., Lee, J. J., Tang, H., Kurie, J. M., Morice, R. C., Kim, E. S., Hong, W. K., Mao, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0058</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Oral Epithelium as a Surrogate Tissue for Assessing Smoking-Induced Molecular Alterations in the Lungs]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>44</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>39</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/45?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Targeting the Activator Protein 1 Transcription Factor for the Prevention of Estrogen Receptor-Negative Mammary Tumors]]></title>
<link>http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/45?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The oncogene <I>erbB2</I> is overexpressed in 20% to 30% human breast cancers and is most commonly overexpressed in estrogen receptor (ER)&ndash;negative breast cancers. Transgenic mice expressing erbB2 develop ER-negative mammary tumors, mimicking human breast carcinogenesis. Previously, we have shown that activator protein 1 (AP-1) regulates proliferation of ER-negative breast cancer cells. We hypothesized that blockade of AP-1 in mouse mammary epithelial cells will suppress ER-negative tumorigenesis induced by <I>erbB2</I>. Trigenic erbB2 mice were generated by crossing a bigenic pUHD-Tam67/MMTV-rtTA mouse to a MMTV-erbB2 mouse. The resulting trigenic mice develop tumors and express a doxycycline-inducible c-Jun dominant negative mutant (Tam67) in the mammary glands. <I>In vivo</I> AP-1 blockade by Tam67 expression started delayed mammary tumor formation in MMTV-erbB2 mice by more than 11 weeks. By 52 weeks of age, 100% (18 of 18) of the untreated animals had developed mammary tumors, whereas 56% (9 of 16) of the doxycycline-treated trigenic mice developed tumors. In addition, the tumors that arose in the AP-1&ndash;blocked erbB2 mice failed to express Tam67. Twenty-five percent of the doxycycline-treated MMTV-erbB2 mice survived more than 72 weeks of age without developing mammary tumors. Examination of normal-appearing mammary glands from these mice showed that AP-1 blockade by Tam67 also significantly prevents the development of premalignant lesions in these glands. The expression of erbB2 either in normal mammary tissue or in mammary tumors was not altered. Our results show that blocking the AP-1 signaling in mammary cells suppresses erbB2-induced transformation, and show that the AP-1 transcription factor is a critical transducer of erbB2. These results provide a scientific rationale to develop targeted drugs that inhibit AP-1 to prevent the development of ER-negative breast cancer.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shen, Q., Uray, I. P., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Hill, J., Xu, X.-C., Young, M. R., Gunther, E. J., Hilsenbeck, S. G., Colburn, N. H., Chodosh, L. A., Brown, P. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0034</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Targeting the Activator Protein 1 Transcription Factor for the Prevention of Estrogen Receptor-Negative Mammary Tumors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>55</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>45</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/56?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Prediction Model for Lung Cancer Diagnosis that Integrates Genomic and Clinical Features]]></title>
<link>http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/56?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death due, in part, to lack of early diagnostic tools. Bronchoscopy represents a relatively noninvasive initial diagnostic test in smokers with suspect disease, but it has low sensitivity. We have reported a gene expression profile in cytologically normal large airway epithelium obtained via bronchoscopic brushings, which is a sensitive and specific biomarker for lung cancer. Here, we evaluate the independence of the biomarker from other clinical risk factors and determine the performance of a clinicogenomic model that combines clinical factors and gene expression.</p>
<p>Training (<I>n</I> = 76) and test (<I>n</I> = 62) sets consisted of smokers undergoing bronchoscopy for suspicion of lung cancer at five medical centers. Logistic regression models describing the likelihood of having lung cancer using the biomarker, clinical factors, and these data combined were tested using the independent set of patients with nondiagnostic bronchoscopies. The model predictions were also compared with physicians' clinical assessment.</p>
<p>The gene expression biomarker is associated with cancer status in the combined clinicogenomic model (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.005). There is a significant difference in performance of the clinicogenomic relative to the clinical model (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05). In the test set, the clinicogenomic model increases sensitivity and negative predictive value to 100% and results in higher specificity (91%) and positive predictive value (81%) compared with other models. The clinicogenomic model has high accuracy where physician assessment is most uncertain.</p>
<p>The airway gene expression biomarker provides information about the likelihood of lung cancer not captured by clinical factors, and the clinicogenomic model has the highest prediction accuracy. These findings suggest that use of the clinicogenomic model may expedite more invasive testing and definitive therapy for smokers with lung cancer and reduce invasive diagnostic procedures for individuals without lung cancer.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beane, J., Sebastiani, P., Whitfield, T. H., Steiling, K., Dumas, Y.-M., Lenburg, M. E., Spira, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0011</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Prediction Model for Lung Cancer Diagnosis that Integrates Genomic and Clinical Features]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>64</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>56</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/65?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dietary Energy Balance Modulates Signaling through the Akt/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathways in Multiple Epithelial Tissues]]></title>
<link>http://cancerpreventionresearch.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content/short/1/1/65?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The prevalence of obesity, an established risk factor for several types of cancer, has increased steadily over the past several decades in the United States. New targets and strategies for offsetting the effect of obesity on cancer risk are urgently needed. In the present study, we examined the effect of dietary energy balance manipulation on steady-state signaling in multiple epithelial tissues, with a focus on the Akt and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways. For these experiments, male FVB/N and C57BL/6 and female ICR mice were maintained on a control (10 kcal% fat) diet, a diet-induced obesity (DIO; 60 kcal% fat) regimen, or a 30% calorie restriction (CR) regimen for 15 to 17 weeks. Relative to the control group, the DIO regimen increased, whereas CR decreased, circulating insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) as has previously been reported. Western blot analyses showed that the DIO regimen enhanced, whereas CR inhibited, activation of Akt and mTOR, regardless of epithelial tissue or genetic background. In contrast, activation of AMP-activated protein kinase was modulated by dietary energy balance manipulation in the liver but not in the epidermis or dorsolateral prostate. Western blot analyses of epidermal extracts taken from ICR mice also revealed reduced activation of both the IGF-I receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor in CR mice, compared with control mice or mice maintained on the DIO regimen. Taken together, these novel findings suggest that dietary energy balance modulates signaling through cell-surface receptors (i.e., IGF-I receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor), affecting activation of multiple downstream pathways including Akt and mTOR, thus providing important dietary and pharmacologic targets for disrupting the obesity-cancer link.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moore, T., Beltran, L., Carbajal, S., Strom, S., Traag, J., Hursting, S. D., DiGiovanni, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-09</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0022</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dietary Energy Balance Modulates Signaling through the Akt/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathways in Multiple Epithelial Tissues]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>76</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>65</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Research Articles</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>