Advertisement
Research Article

Smoking Cessation and the Risk of Bladder Cancer among Postmenopausal Women

Yueyao Li, Hilary A. Tindle, Michael S. Hendryx, Pengcheng Xun, Ka He, Xiaoyun Liang and Juhua Luo
DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-18-0441 Published May 2019

Abstract

Smoking is the strongest established risk factor for bladder cancer. Former smokers have a lower risk of bladder cancer compared with current smokers, but findings on the dose–response relationship between years after quitting and the risk of bladder cancer are inconsistent. A total of 143,279 postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative Study were included. Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied for estimating age- and multivariable-adjusted HRs and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). There were 870 bladder cancer cases identified over an average of 14.8 years of follow-up. After adjusting for pack-years of smoking, bladder cancer risk among former smokers declined by 25% within the first 10 years of cessation and continued to decrease as cessation time increased but remained higher than never smokers after 30 years of quitting (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.43–2.58). Smokers who quit smoking had a lower risk of bladder cancer compared with current smokers (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40–0.94). We conclude that among postmenopausal women, there is a significant reduction in the risk of bladder cancer after quitting smoking. In addition to primary prevention, smoking cessation is critical to prevent the incidence of bladder cancer in older women.

Introduction

Bladder cancer is the ninth most common cancer worldwide, with incidence rates especially higher in Europe and North America compared with Asia (1, 2). Epidemiologic evidence indicates that bladder cancer is more common among males, older adults, and white populations due to genetic susceptibilities (3, 4). In the United States, bladder cancer ranks as the fourth most common cancer in men and ninth most common cancer in women (5). Previous findings suggested that postmenopausal women may have a higher risk of bladder cancer compared with women who had not undergone menopause, although the possible reasons are still under investigation (6). In addition, women with bladder cancer often have more serious prognoses and tend to have worse outcomes in comparison with men even when bladder cancers are at similar stages (7). Most of previous studies regarding risk factors for bladder cancer have been focused on men or the general population (8, 9), and studies conducted among older women are insufficient.

Smoking has been recognized as the strongest established risk factor for bladder cancer, accounting for approximately 65% of disease risk in men and 20% to 30% in women (10, 11). The chemicals contained in cigarettes, such as 2-naphthylamine, 4-aminobiphenyl and other arylamines, are known as bladder carcinogens (12–14). Other well-established and potential risk factors for both genders include occupational exposure to dyestuffs, low fruit and vegetable intake, obesity, and family history (9). In female nonsmokers, environmental exposure to second-hand smoking is also suggested to be related to higher risk of bladder cancer (14, 15).

Epidemiologic studies have found that the strength of the smoking–bladder cancer association rises with increases in smoking intensity (cigarettes per day) and duration (16). Former smokers have a significantly lower risk of bladder cancer in comparison with current smokers (10, 17, 18), but findings on the dose–response relationship between cessation time and risk of bladder cancer are inconsistent. It is also unclear whether the risk of bladder cancer among former smokers ever normalizes to that of never smokers after quitting smoking (9, 16, 19–22). However, most of these studies were case–control studies, and none of them were among postmenopausal women. Because the proportion of former smokers continues to increase, and the number of former smokers has exceeded that of current smokers since 2005 (23), conducting a prospective cohort study among postmenopausal women—a population with a large proportion of former smokers—will help to clarify these previous findings (22, 24).

It is also suggested that the molecular pathways regarding muscle-invasive bladder cancer and non–muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma in situ are different. However, it is not clear that whether the smoking cessation is related to similar risks reduction of the different subtypes of bladder cancer (25–31). In this study, we investigated the dose–response relationship between years since quitting (YSQ) smoking and the risk of bladder cancer among postmenopausal women who were former smokers, and further explored if these associations differed between two subtypes of bladder cancer—transitional and papillary bladder cancer.

Materials and Methods

Study population

The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Study was established to investigate major causes of morbidity and mortality among postmenopausal women (32). Detailed information about design, scientific rationale, eligibility, and baseline characteristics of the participants and recruitment methods of WHI has been published elsewhere (33, 34). In this study, we used data from WHI clinical trials and observational study. A total of 161,808 postmenopausal women ages 50 to 79 years were recruited between 1993 and 1998 and were followed up every 6 to 12 months. Participated women were asked to complete self-report screening and enrolment questionnaires, interviews, physical examinations, and blood sample collection. Written-informed consent and appropriate Institutional Review Board approval were obtained by each participating WHI site. Because women with prevalent cancers were more likely to be advised to adopt healthy lifestyles (including quitting smoking) by their healthcare providers, we excluded women with cancer other than melanoma skin cancer at baseline (n = 12,655). Women whose information on smoking was missing at baseline (n = 1,959) were also excluded. The primary exposure in our study was smoking cessation, so in the primary analysis, we also excluded former smokers whose information on age of quitting smoking was missing (n = 3,915), reaching 143,279 postmenopausal women for primary data analysis.

Exposure assessment

In the WHI, information about smoking was collected at baseline and during the follow-ups. The participated women were asked “during your entire life, have you smoked at least 100 cigarettes” at the entry of the study. Participants who answered no were categorized as never smoked, and those who answered yes were categorized as ever smokers. Ever smokers were then grouped into former or current smokers based on their answer to the question “Do you smoke cigarettes now?” A new variable representing YSQ for each former smoker was calculated as the difference between age at baseline and median age of quitting smoking, and then categorized into <10, 10–<20, 20–<30, and ≥30 years or more. Updated information on smoking was collected in the clinical trials and observational study at years 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, by asking “Do you smoke cigarettes now?” For baseline current smokers, those who answered “no” to this question during follow-ups were categorized as new quitters, and those who answered “yes” were categorized as current smokers during follow-ups. For baseline former smokers, the total nonsmoking years during follow-ups were added to their total YSQ. For those who quit smoking and then relapsed during the follow-ups, the total years since quitting smoking was computed as the total years they stayed away from smoking. Women whose information on smoking during follow-ups was missing, their answers to smoking status during their last available visits were used.

Number of cigarettes per day was collected by answers to the question “on the average, how many cigarettes do you (did you) usually smoke each day?” The variable was originally categorized as “<1,” “1—4,” “5–14,” “15–24,” “25–34,” “35–44,” and “≥45.” Based on the data distribution and previous study (35), we recategorized the variable as “<5,” “5–<15,” “15–<25,” and “≥25” cigarettes per day. Pack-years of smoking was computed from total years of smoking and numbers of cigarettes per day.

Outcome assessment

In the WHI, bladder cancer incidence was documented and coded for primary site. The diagnosis of bladder cancer was initially identified through self-administered questionnaires, then confirmed by a centralized review of medical records, including pathology reports (if the resections or biopsies were available) from diagnostic aspirations, surgeries, and discharge summaries, and subsequently adjudicated by trained, central adjudicators.

The histology subtypes of bladder cancer sites were coded according to the ICD-O-2 (International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Second Edition). In this study, we excluded carcinoma in situ. Based on the National Cancer Institute (NIH) bladder cancer morphology and grade description, we described bladder cancer as three subtypes: transitional cell carcinoma, papillary carcinoma, and other types (including squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, small cell carcinoma, lymphoepithelial carcinoma, hemangiosarcoma, clear cell adenocarcinoma, and undifferentiated carcinoma; ref. 36).

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics were examined by participants' smoking status. ANOVA was performed to test the difference for continuous variables, and χ2 tests were used to test for categorical variables, across different groups of smoking status.

Potential confounders were determined based on previous studies and by covariates whose parameter estimates changed more than 10% after being added to the model. Confounders that were used in multivariable analysis included age at enrollment (in continuous), race/ethnicity (American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, Black or African-American, Hispanic/Latino, White not of Hispanic origin, and others), education (high school or less, some college or technical training, college or post-college, and master's degree or higher), occupation (homemaker/raising children/other, managerial/professional specialty, technical/sales/administrative support, service, operator/fabricator/laborers, and others), marital status (never married, divorced or separated, widowed, presently married, and marriage-like relationship such as living together for ≥2 years or living together <2 years but have children together), alcohol intake (nondrinker, former drinker, and current drinker), physical activity (no activity, some activity or limited duration, 2–<4 episodes per week, and ≥4 episodes per week), family cancer history (yes/no), body mass index (BMI, <25, 25–29.9, and ≥30 kg/m2), daily dietary energy intake (kcal, in continuous) and percentage of calories from fat (%, in continuous), and daily fruit and vegetable consumption (medium portion of servings, in continuous).

Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate age-adjusted and multivariable-adjusted HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We performed four sequential models to analyze the association between YSQ and the risk of bladder cancer (4, 9, 37): Model 1 was adjusted for age only. Model 2 was additionally adjusted for education, race/ethnicity, occupation, marital status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, family history of cancer, BMI, daily total energy intake and percentage of energy from fat, and daily fruit and vegetable consumption. Model 3 was adjusted for variables that were adjusted in Model 2 and cigarettes per day. Model 4 was adjusted for the variables that were adjusted in Model 2 and pack-years of smoking. Trend test was performed among former smokers to examine the linear dose–response relationship between YSQ and risk of bladder cancer by treating the median values of each YSQ category as continuous variable in the multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression models.

Follow-up time for each participant was calculated as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of bladder cancer diagnosis, loss-to-follow-up, death, or administrative censoring date, whichever came first. When using data incorporated with follow-up information, there were less than 1,000 women who had quit smoking for fewer than 10 years, so we combined YSQ less than 10 and 10–20 years into one category as YSQ less than 20 years. We then performed two separate analyses to examine the association between YSQ and risk of bladder cancer using smoking status from both baseline and follow-ups. We first examined the association by treating women who quit smoking during follow-ups as a separate group. In the second method, women who quit smoking during follow-ups were treated as former smokers, and their total nonsmoking years were combined with YSQ of baseline former smokers to calculate the new YSQ. Model 4 from the primary analysis was reconducted by treating women who continued to smoke during follow-ups as the reference group.

We assessed the relation between smoking cessation and subtypes of bladder cancer risks using a joint Cox model, in which transitional and papillary bladder cancer were modeled at the same time, adjusted for covariates from Model 4 in the primary analysis (38).

Finally, to compare the difference in risk of bladder cancer between women who continued smoking and those who quit during follow-up, we performed a secondary analysis using time-updated smoking status.

All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS (Version 9.4, SAS Institute). Two-sided P values were reported, and a P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

By February 28, 2017, 870 bladder cancer cases occurred. Among the postmenopausal women included in the study, there were 75,458 (52.67%) never smokers, 57,606 (40.21%) former smokers, and 10,215 (7.13%) current smokers. The baseline characteristics of the participants by smoking status are shown in Table 1. In comparison to never smokers, former smokers were slightly younger, more likely to be non-Hispanic White, tend to have lower BMI, to hold higher degrees, to work in managerial or professional fields, to be divorced or separated, to have a higher rate of family history of cancers, to be current drinkers, and to have low fat dietary intake.

View this table:
Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the study participants by smoking status in the WHI study

The association between YSQ and bladder cancer risk is shown in Table 2. When adjusting for age only, in comparison with never smokers, former smokers and current smokers had 2.01 (95% CI, 1.74–2.33) and 3.39 (95% CI, 2.71–4.24) times the risk of bladder cancer, respectively. After further adjusting for race/ethnicity, education level, occupation, marital status, alcohol consumption, BMI, family history of cancer, physical activity, and daily food consumption, the results from Model 2 (Table 2) showed that bladder cancer continued to decrease with greater YSQ (P for trend: <0.0001), with HR = 2.77 (95% CI, 2.17–3.53) for YSQ < 10 years, HR = 2.19 (95% CI, 1.75–2.74) for YSQ 10–<20 years, and HR = 1.96 (95% CI, 1.55–2.47) for YSQ 20–<30 years. For former smokers who quit smoking for 30 years or longer, there was no significant difference in risk of bladder cancer between former and never smokers (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.99–1.65). However, after further adjusted for numbers of cigarettes per day or pack years of smoking (Models 3 and 4; Table 2, columns 4–5), former smokers with YSQ ≥ 30 still had significantly higher risk of bladder cancer when compared with never smokers (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.37–2.58 and HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.43–2.58, respectively).

View this table:
Table 2.

Age-adjusted and multivariable-adjusted HR of bladder cancer in relation to years since quitting smoking

A total of 1,358 baseline smokers quit smoking during the follow-ups. When only using baseline smoking status (Table 3, column 2), in comparison with current smokers, the most rapid decline in risk of bladder cancer occurred during the first 10 years of smoking cessation (declined rate = 25%). In comparison with those who continued to smoke, women who quit smoking during follow-ups had 39% reduction in bladder cancer risk (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40–0.94; Table 3). The risk of bladder cancer continued to decline as YSQ increased.

View this table:
Table 3.

Multivariate-adjusted HR of bladder cancer by years since quitting smoking in former smokers compared with current smokersa

The results from the analysis of the association between smoking cessation and subtypes of bladder cancer followed similar patterns (Table 4). Former smokers who quit smoking for ≥30 years still had elevated risk of bladder cancer of both major subtypes of bladder cancer. In the model that additionally adjusted for pack-years of smoking, former smokers who quit smoking for 30 years or more had 1.88 (95% CI, 0.94–3.76) hazard of transitional bladder cancer and 1.87 (95% CI, 1.31–2.67) hazard of papillary bladder cancer in comparison with never smokers. Results were similar to the model adjusted for cigarettes per day. The HRs for transitional and papillary bladder cancer were similar for both former and current smokers, in comparison with never smokers. The P value for the test of difference in HRs across the two subtypes was 0.48 for model adjusted for pack-years of smoking (0.44 for model adjusted for cigarettes per day), indicating that there is no significant difference in smoking cessation and HR of bladder cancer across different subtypes.

View this table:
Table 4.

Multivariate-adjusted HR of subtypes of bladder cancers in relation to smoking status

Discussion

In this large prospective study among postmenopausal women, we found that smoking cessation was inversely associated with the risk of bladder cancer in comparison with current smokers. Models using baseline data showed that after taking into account pack-years of smoking, the most rapid decrease occurred in the first 10 YSQ, with risk dropping by 25%. The risk of bladder cancer continued decreasing after 10 YSQ but remained substantially elevated relative to never smokers by 1.92 times even after 30 years of cessation. Results from models that used time-updated information on smoking showed a similar pattern. In comparison with women who continued to smoke, those who quit smoking during follow-ups had a 39% decline in risk of bladder cancer, and the risk continued to drop with greater YSQ. We found similar patterns in results of subtypes of bladder cancer.

The relationship between smoking and risk of bladder cancer has been well-established by previous studies conducted in both genders (16, 17, 20, 22, 25). Nevertheless, the magnitude of risk reduction among former smokers has remained controversial. Some studies suggested that former smokers have elevated risks of bladder cancer in comparison with never smokers by approximately 2-fold (10). A systematic review of eight case–control studies found that bladder cancer risk was up to 3 times higher for former smokers relative to never smokers (39). Three large prospective studies reported bladder cancer risk among former smokers were 2.00 to 2.25 times higher in comparison with never smokers (10, 22, 40). When adjusted for pack-years of smoking or number of cigarettes per day, our study confirmed that among postmenopausal women, there was a 2.57 to 2.77 times elevated risk of bladder cancer among former smokers compared with never smokers. After quitting smoking, in comparison with current smokers, former smokers experience a 25% decrease in risk of bladder cancer over 10 YSQ, which continues to decrease with greater YSQ.

Findings on whether the risk of bladder cancer of former smokers can decrease to the level of never smokers also remained inconsistent in studies conducted in the general population (18, 22, 39, 41). Some studies suggested that the risk of bladder cancer among former smokers decreased to close to never smokers after more than 20 years of quitting (17, 19, 20). However, other studies indicated that the bladder cancer risk decreased as YSQ increased, but the risk remained elevated after quitting smoking for more than 20 years (8, 16, 21, 22, 40). Results from our multivariable-adjusted model (Model 2) showed that there was no statistically significant difference in risk of bladder cancer between former smokers who quit smoking for 30 years or more and never smokers. However, after further adjusting for numbers of cigarettes per day (Model 3) or pack-years of smoking (Model 4), the risk of bladder cancer in former smokers remained significantly higher than that of never smokers even after 30 or more YSQ. This change in results suggests that smoking intensity and duration should be taken into account when analyzing the smoking–bladder cancer association (16).

The dose–response relationship between YSQ and risk of bladder cancer was examined by previous studies in both men and women. One study suggested an approximate dose–response trend between YSQ and reduction in risk of bladder cancer (17), and other studies found that the decrease in bladder cancer risk occurred within the first 2 to 5 YSQ, then slowed down as YSQ increased (8, 18, 41, 42). We observed that among postmenopausal women who were former smokers, there was a significantly lower risk of bladder cancer compared with current smokers, with the most rapid reduction in the first 10 YSQ. The risk continued to decrease after the first 10 YSQ among former smokers, but did not follow a dose–response pattern for all time periods.

The biological mechanisms of the association between smoking and bladder cancer remain unclear. Some studies suggested that findings from smoking and bladder cancer risks can be connected with models of tobacco-related carcinogenesis in lung cancer and other smoking-related cancers, which suggested that the exposure of long-term smoking persistently facilitates DNA adducts by interfering with apoptosis and affecting the repair procedure (43). Long-term exposure to the myriad components of cigarette smoke, including aromatic amines, facilitates the formation of DNA adducts and induces mutations in primary cancer-related genes such as the RUNX3 and IGF2-H19 loci in immortalized urothelial cells. Hypomethylation at these sites, in turn, prompts the process of carcinogenesis (43, 44). Recent studies suggested that exposure to smoking may be involved in tumorigenesis at early stages (30, 44). The genotoxic effects of smoking are considered to be the most important effects given its role in early stages of carcinogenesis and high-frequency occurrence. This early stage effect may explain our findings on remaining elevated hazard risk of bladder cancer among former smokers compared with never smokers, even after many YSQ (45).

We found similar associations between YSQ and risks of papillary and transitional bladder cancers, which is also consistent with findings from previous studies conducted in the general population (30, 43). Findings of several previous studies suggest that the association between age of smoking initiation, duration of smoking, and the risk of bladder cancer was stronger in invasive bladder cancer subtypes in comparison with noninvasive subtypes (25, 30, 31). For example, people who started smoking at an early age or smoked for longer duration were more likely to develop more invasive subtypes, such as basal-like bladder cancers rather than luminal-like cancers (30). Smoking cessation is found to be associated with reduction of all subtypes of bladder cancer. The magnitude of reduction is more prominent among superficial bladder cancer than muscle-invasive cancer (25). Our finding on bladder cancer subtypes indicated that for both transitional and papillary bladder cancers, the HRs decreased with greater YSQ, but even after quitting smoking for 30 years, HRs of both subtypes remained higher among former smokers in comparison with never smokers.

The strengths of our study include using data from a large prospective cohort of postmenopausal women, with participants from wide-spread geographical areas. This study provides information on a population that has been understudied in terms of smoking and also of bladder cancer. We included detailed information on exposure as well as potential confounders. The confirmation of cases was by trained adjudicators according to standard cancer codes. However, there are limitations of our study. First of all, the small numbers of cases for subtypes of bladder cancer restricted our analysis on associations between smoking cessation and risks of other subtypes of bladder cancer. However, according to a Surviellance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program report, papillary and transitional cell carcinomas comprise 90% to 95% of all bladder cancers, which implied that our findings still have public health significance (36). Secondly, the smoking prevalence in the whole U.S. population is 15.1% (46). The prevalence of smoking in the WHI is 6.9%, which is close to the prevalence of smoking among people who are 65 and older reported by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), but still smaller than the prevalence of the whole population. This difference may attenuate the generalizability of our findings.

In conclusion, by using a large prospective cohort study of postmenopausal women, we found that in comparison with women who currently smoke, former smokers experienced a 25% decrease in risk of bladder cancer within 10 YSQ, and this risk continued to decrease with greater YSQ, though remained higher than that of never smokers after 30 or more YSQ. Thus, older women who smoke should be advised to quit smoking in order to reduce their bladder cancer risk. The study indicates the importance of primary prevention as well as the importance of smoking cessation. Further studies examining the underlying mechanisms of relationships between smoking and bladder cancer, and studies exploring the relationships between smoking cessation and other subtypes of bladder cancer are likely to further our understanding of this issue.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

H.A. Tindle is a consultant/advisory board member for Achieve Life Sciences and received donated smoking cessation medications from manufacturer. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Disclaimer

All authors have no funding source involving the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, writing of the article, or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: Y. Li, X. Liang, J. Luo

Development of methodology: Y. Li, J. Luo

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): Y. Li, M.S. Hendryx, P. Xun, J. Luo

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: Y. Li, H.A. Tindle, M.S. Hendryx, P. Xun, K. He, X. Liang, J. Luo

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): Y. Li

Study supervision: Y. Li, J. Luo

Appendix

SHORT LIST OF WHI INVESTIGATORS

Program Office: (National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland) Jacques Rossouw, Shari Ludlam, Joan McGowan, Leslie Ford, and Nancy Geller

Clinical Coordinating Center: (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA) Garnet Anderson, Ross Prentice, Andrea LaCroix, and Charles Kooperberg

Investigators and Academic Centers: (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) JoAnn E. Manson; (MedStar Health Research Institute/Howard University, Washington, DC) Barbara V. Howard; (Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford, CA) Marcia L. Stefanick; (The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH) Rebecca Jackson; (University of Arizona, Tucson/Phoenix, AZ) Cynthia A. Thomson; (University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY) Jean Wactawski-Wende; (University of Florida, Gainesville/Jacksonville, FL) Marian Limacher; (University of Iowa, Iowa City/Davenport, IA) Jennifer Robinson; (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA) Lewis Kuller; (Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC) Sally Shumaker; (University of Nevada, Reno, NV) Robert Brunner; (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN) Karen L. Margolis

Women's Health Initiative Memory Study: (Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC) Mark Espeland

For a list of all the investigators who have contributed to WHI science, please visit: https://www.whi.org/researchers/Documents%20%20Write%20a%20Paper/WHI%20Investigator%20Long%20List.pdf

Acknowledgments

The WHI program is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH, and United States Department of Health and Human Services through contracts HHSN268201100046C, HHSN268201100001C, HHSN268201100002C, HHSN26 8201100003C, HHSN268201100004C, and HHSN27120 1100004C.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • Received November 13, 2018.
  • Revision received February 1, 2019.
  • Accepted February 26, 2019.
  • Published first May 1, 2019.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ferlay J,
    2. Soerjomataram I,
    3. Dikshit R,
    4. Eser S,
    5. Mathers C,
    6. Rebelo M,
    7. et al.
    Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136:E359–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ferlay J,
    2. Steliarova-Foucher E,
    3. Lortet-Tieulent J,
    4. Rosso S,
    5. Coebergh J,
    6. Comber H,
    7. et al.
    Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer 2013;49:1374–403.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Pashos CL,
    2. Botteman MF,
    3. Laskin BL,
    4. Redaelli A
    . Bladder cancer: epidemiology, diagnosis, and management. Cancer Pract 2002;10:311–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Janković S,
    2. Radosavljević V
    . Risk factors for bladder cancer. Tumori 2007;93:4–12.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Fajkovic H,
    2. Halpern J,
    3. Cha E,
    4. Bahadori A,
    5. Chromecki T,
    6. Karakiewicz P,
    7. et al.
    Impact of gender on bladder cancer incidence, staging, and prognosis. World J Urol 2011;29:457–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Dietrich K,
    2. Demidenko E,
    3. Schned A,
    4. Zens MS,
    5. Heaney J,
    6. Karagas MR
    . Parity, early menopause and the incidence of bladder cancer in women: a case-control study and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2011;47:592–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Scosyrev E,
    2. Trivedi D,
    3. Messing E
    . Female bladder cancer: incidence, treatment, and outcome. Curr Opin Urol 2010;20:404–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Brennan P,
    2. Bogillot O,
    3. Cordier S,
    4. Greiser E,
    5. Schill W,
    6. Vineis P,
    7. et al.
    Cigarette smoking and bladder cancer in men: a pooled analysis of 11 case-control studies. Int J Cancer 2000;86:289–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Al-Zalabani AH,
    2. Stewart KF,
    3. Wesselius A,
    4. Schols AM,
    5. Zeegers MP
    . Modifiable risk factors for the prevention of bladder cancer: a systematic review of meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2016;31:811–51.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Freedman ND,
    2. Silverman DT,
    3. Hollenbeck AR,
    4. Schatzkin A,
    5. Abnet CC
    . Association between smoking and risk of bladder cancer among men and women. JAMA 2011;306:737–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Wilhelm-Benartzi CZ,
    2. Christensen BC,
    3. Koestler DC,
    4. Houseman EA,
    5. Schned AR,
    6. Karagas M,
    7. et al.
    Association of secondhand smoke exposures with DNA methylation in bladder carcinomas. Cancer Causes Control 2011;22:1205–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Skipper PL,
    2. Tannenbaum SR,
    3. Ross RK,
    4. Yu MC
    . Nonsmoking-related arylamine exposure and bladder cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003;12:503–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Anderson KE,
    2. Carmella SG,
    3. Ye M,
    4. Bliss RL,
    5. Le C,
    6. Murphy L,
    7. et al.
    Metabolites of a tobacco-specific lung carcinogen in nonsmoking women exposed to environmental tobacco smoke. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:378–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Marks P,
    2. Soave A,
    3. Shariat S,
    4. Fajkovic H,
    5. Fisch M,
    6. Rink M
    . Female with bladder cancer: what and why is there a difference? Transl Androl Urol 2016;5:668–82.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Jiang X,
    2. Yuan JM,
    3. Skipper PL,
    4. Tannenbaum SR,
    5. Yu MC
    . Environmental tobacco smoke and bladder cancer risk in never smokers of Los Angeles County. Cancer Res 2007;67:7540–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Baris D,
    2. Karagas MR,
    3. Verrill C,
    4. Johnson A,
    5. Andrew AS,
    6. Marsit C,
    7. et al.
    A case-control study of smoking and bladder cancer risk: emergent patterns over time. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101:1553–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Samanic C,
    2. Kogevinas M,
    3. Dosemeci M,
    4. Malats N,
    5. Real FX,
    6. Garcia-Closas M,
    7. et al.
    Smoking and bladder cancer in Spain: effects of tobacco type, timing, environmental tobacco smoke, and gender. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:1348–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Hartge P,
    2. Silverman D,
    3. Hoover R,
    4. Schairer C,
    5. Altman R,
    6. Austin D,
    7. et al.
    Changing cigarette habits and bladder cancer risk: a case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1987;78:1119–25.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Castelao JE,
    2. Yuan JM,
    3. Skipper PL,
    4. Tannenbaum SR,
    5. Gago-Dominguez M,
    6. Crowder J,
    7. et al.
    Gender-and smoking-related bladder cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:538–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Sorahan T,
    2. Lancashire RJ,
    3. Sole G
    . Urothelial cancer and cigarette smoking: findings from a regional case-controlled study. Br J Urol 1994;74:753–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Zeegers MP,
    2. Goldbohm RA,
    3. van den Brandt PA
    . A prospective study on active and environmental tobacco smoking and bladder cancer risk (The Netherlands). Cancer Causes Control 2002;13:83–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Welty CJ,
    2. Wright JL,
    3. Hotaling JM,
    4. Bhatti P,
    5. Porter MP,
    6. White E
    . Persistence of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder risk among former smokers: results from a contemporary, prospective cohort study. Urol Oncol 2014;32:25e1–5.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). State-specific prevalence of cigarette smoking and quitting among adults–United States, 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2005;54:1124–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Robinson S,
    2. Harris H
    . Smoking and drinking among adults. Kew, London: The National Archives; 2011.
  25. 25.↵
    1. Jiang X,
    2. Castelao JE,
    3. Yuan JM,
    4. Stern MC,
    5. Conti DV,
    6. Cortessis VK,
    7. et al.
    Cigarette smoking and subtypes of bladder cancer. Int J Cancer 2012;130:896–901.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Kaye KW,
    2. Lange PH
    . Mode of presentation of invasive bladder cancer: reassessment of the problem. J Urol 1982;128:31–3.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Cartwright RA,
    2. Adib R,
    3. Appleyard I,
    4. Glashan RW,
    5. Gray B,
    6. Hamilton-Stewart PA,
    7. et al.
    Cigarette smoking and bladder cancer: an epidemiological inquiry in West Yorkshire. J Epidemiol Community Health 1983;37:256–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Brooks DR,
    2. Geller AC,
    3. Chang J,
    4. Miller DR
    . Occupation, smoking, and the risk of high-grade invasive bladder cancer in Missouri. Am J Ind Med 1992;21:699–713.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Hayes RB,
    2. Friedell GH,
    3. Zahm SH,
    4. Cole P
    . Are the known bladder cancer risk-factors associated with more advanced bladder cancer? Cancer Causes Control 1993;4:157–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Sun X,
    2. Hoadley KA,
    3. Kim WY,
    4. Furberg H,
    5. Olshan AF,
    6. Troester MA
    . Age at diagnosis, obesity, smoking, and molecular subtypes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cancer Causes Control 2017;28:539–44.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. van Roekel EH,
    2. Cheng KK,
    3. James ND,
    4. Wallace DM,
    5. Billingham LJ,
    6. Murray PG,
    7. et al.
    Smoking is associated with lower age, higher grade, higher stage, and larger size of malignant bladder tumors at diagnosis. Int J Cancer 2013;133:446–54.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    The Women's Health Initiative Study Group. Design of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. The Women's Health Initiative Study Group. Control Clin Trials 1998;19:61–109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Hays J,
    2. Hunt JR,
    3. Hubbell FA,
    4. Anderson GL,
    5. Limacher M,
    6. Allen C,
    7. et al.
    The women's health initiative recruitment methods and results. Ann of Epidemiol 2003;13:S18–S77.
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.↵
    1. Langer RD,
    2. White E,
    3. Lewis CE,
    4. Kotchen JM,
    5. Hendrix SL,
    6. Trevisan M
    . The women's health initiative observational study: baseline characteristics of participants and reliability of baseline measures. Ann Epidemiol 2003;13(9 Suppl):S107–S21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Luo J,
    2. Margolis KL,
    3. Wactawski-Wende J,
    4. Horn K,
    5. Messina C,
    6. Stefanick M,
    7. et al.
    Association of active and passive smoking with risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women: a prospective cohort study. BMJ 2011;342:d1016.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    SEER Training Modules. Types of bladder cancer. U. S. National Cancer Institute of Health, National Cancer Institute. Available from: https://training.seer.cancer.gov/bladder/intro/types.html. Accessed November 1, 2018.
  37. 37.↵
    1. Letašiová S,
    2. Medve'ová A,
    3. Šovčíková A,
    4. Dušinská M,
    5. Volkovová K,
    6. Mosoiu C,
    7. et al.
    Bladder cancer, a review of the environmental risk factors. Environ Health 2012;11Suppl 1:S11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Xue X,
    2. Kim MY,
    3. Gaudet MM,
    4. Park Y,
    5. Heo M,
    6. Hollenbeck AR,
    7. et al.
    A comparison of the polytomous logistic regression and joint cox proportional hazards models for evaluating multiple disease subtypes in prospective cohort studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013;22:275–85.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Rink M,
    2. Crivelli JJ,
    3. Shariat SE,
    4. Chun FK,
    5. Messing EM,
    6. Soloway MS
    . Smoking and bladder cancer: a systematic review of risk and outcomes. Eur Urol Focus 2015;1:17–27.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    1. Bjerregaard BK,
    2. Raaschou-Nielsen O,
    3. Sørensen M,
    4. Frederiksen K,
    5. Christensen J,
    6. Tjønneland A,
    7. et al.
    Tobacco smoke and bladder cancer–in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Int J Cancer 2006;119:2412–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Augustine A,
    2. Hebert JR,
    3. Kabat GC,
    4. Wynder LE
    . Bladder cancer in relation to cigarette smoking. Cancer Res 1988;48:4405–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Burch JD,
    2. Rohan TE,
    3. Howe GR,
    4. Risch HA,
    5. Hill GB,
    6. Steele R,
    7. et al.
    Risk of bladder cancer by source and type of tobacco exposure: a case-control study. Int J Cancer 1989;44:622–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Polesel J,
    2. Bosetti C,
    3. di Maso M,
    4. Montella M,
    5. Libra M,
    6. Garbeglio A,
    7. et al.
    Duration and intensity of tobacco smoking and the risk of papillary and non-papillary transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Cancer Causes Control 2014;25:1151–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Hecht SS
    . Tobacco carcinogens, their biomarkers and tobacco-induced cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:733–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Benhamou S,
    2. Laplanche A,
    3. Guillonneau B,
    4. Mejean A,
    5. Desgrandchamps F,
    6. Schrameck C,
    7. et al.
    DNA adducts in normal bladder tissue and bladder cancer risk. Mutagenesis 2003;18:445–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    Current cigarette smoking among adults in the United States Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2016. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/adult_data/cig_smoking/index.htm. Accessed November 1, 2018.
Back to top
View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Smoking Cessation and the Risk of Bladder Cancer among Postmenopausal Women
Yueyao Li, Hilary A. Tindle, Michael S. Hendryx, Pengcheng Xun, Ka He, Xiaoyun Liang and Juhua Luo
Cancer Prev Res May 1 2019 (12) (5) 305-314; DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-18-0441
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Advertisement