Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Must- Read Articles
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Must- Read Articles
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Article

Vitamin D3 Inhibits Hedgehog Signaling and Proliferation in Murine Basal Cell Carcinomas

Jean Y. Tang, Tony Zheng Xiao, Yuko Oda, Kris S. Chang, Elana Shpall, Angela Wu, Po-Lin So, Jennifer Hebert, Daniel Bikle and Ervin H. Epstein Jr.
Jean Y. Tang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tony Zheng Xiao
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuko Oda
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kris S. Chang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elana Shpall
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angela Wu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Po-Lin So
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Hebert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Bikle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ervin H. Epstein Jr.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0285 Published May 2011
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Constitutive Hedgehog (HH) signaling underlies several human tumors, including basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Recently, Bijlsma and colleagues reported a new biologic function for vitamin D3 in suppressing HH signaling in an in vitro model system. On the basis of that work, we have assessed effects of vitamin D3 on HH signaling and proliferation of murine BCCs in vitro and in vivo. We find that indeed in BCC cells, vitamin D3 blocks both proliferation and HH signaling as assessed by mRNA expression of the HH target gene Gli1. These effects of vitamin D3 on Gli1 expression and on BCC cell proliferation are comparable to the effects of cyclopamine, a known inhibitor of the HH pathway. These results are specific for vitamin D3, because the precursor 7-dehydrocholesterol and the downstream products 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 [25(OH)D] and 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D] are considerably less effective in reducing either Gli1 mRNA or cellular proliferation. Moreover, these effects seem to be independent of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) because short hairpin RNA knockdown of VDR does not abrogate the anti-HH effects of D3 despite reducing expression of the VDR target gene 24-hydroxylase. Finally, topical vitamin D3 treatment of existing murine BCC tumors significantly decreases Gli1 and Ki67 staining. Thus, topical vitamin D3 acting via its HH inhibiting effect may hold promise as an effective anti-BCC agent. Cancer Prev Res; 4(5); 744–51. ©2011 AACR.

Introduction

In 1941, Apperly (1) noted that the incidence of colon cancer in the United States is considerably higher in the north than in the south, and the data favoring this “latitudinal gradient” remain strong for several cancers including in particular those of the colon, breast, and prostate. Four decades later, Garland and Garland noted that the differences in cancer incidence in different locales are inversely related to the amount of sunlight they receive and proposed that this gradient might be explained by an anticancer effect of varying amounts of vitamin D made in sun-exposed skin (2, 3). This proposal has been seminal, and 6,000 papers have been published touching on vitamin D and cancer. Approaches taken to investigate this putative relationship include comparisons between cancer risk and sun exposure and/or dietary vitamin D intake; assessments of circulating 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 [25(OH)D], the most readily available measurement of body vitamin D status, in patients with cancers and controls; comparisons of DNA polymorphisms in the genes encoding the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and the enzyme responsible for the catabolism of the VDR ligand, 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D]; and studies of the cancer preventive effects of supplemental dietary vitamin D. The latter include one very large prospective study of the effects of 400 IU of vitamin D3 per day, which showed no effects on cancer incidence or mortality (4), albeit the compliance rate in this study was poor, and one considerably smaller prospective study of 1,100 IU vitamin D3 per day, which found a statistically significant reduction of cancer incidence in those taking the vitamin supplement (5). Taken together, the positive correlation of cancer incidence and latitude of residence seems strong and the inverse correlation of sunlight exposure and cancer seems moderately strong, but the mechanistic importance of any inverse correlation of cancer incidence and vitamin D3 and the anticancer efficacy of vitamin D3 supplementation remain uncertain (6–8).

The most studied mechanism of the effect of vitamin D3 is the 1,25(OH)2D-induced transcriptional activation of the VDR with resultant changes in cell behavior including enhanced differentiation and reduced proliferation of skin keratinocytes (9–11). By contrast, Bijlsma and colleagues (12) recently proposed a new biologic function for unhydroxylated vitamin D3—the inhibition of hedgehog (HH) signaling. They found that D3 binds to Smo specifically and thereby inhibits Gli reporter activity in C3H/10T1/2 fibroblasts in vitro. In addition, D3 treatment of zebrafish in vivo mimicked the Smo−/− phenotype. In fact, Bijlsma and colleagues (12) propose that Ptch1 protein accomplishes its inhibition of HH signaling by transporting vitamin D3 to Smo protein.

HH signaling was identified initially as a pathway crucial to development but more recently has come to be seen as a potentially important stimulator of carcinogenesis when dysregulated. This can occur via mutations in the genes encoding components of the pathway or by excess production of HH ligand by the tumor or stromal cells (13). Indeed, the first human inhibitor of HH signaling GDC-0449 is now in clinical trials for at least 8 human cancers (clinicaltrials.gov), and several other HH inhibitors are in varying stages of clinical development.

Of the human cancers with mutations in HH signaling pathway components, the best studied tumor–HH relationship in humans and mice is that found in basal cell carcinomas (BCC), and inhibition of HH signaling with small molecule drugs can have dramatic inhibitory effects on human BCCs (14). BCCs are the most common of all human cancers, affecting approximately 1 million Americans per year (15). The pivotal molecular abnormality in BCCs is constitutive activation of the HH signaling pathway, in 10% to 20% of tumors by mutational activation of SMO and in the great majority of the others associated with mutational inactivation of PTCH1 (16–23). In addition to mutational activation of the HH pathway, human BCCs also frequently have mutations in p53 (22, 24). Ptch1+/− mice develop BCCs after mutational insults, and the addition of conditional loss of keratinocyte p53 greatly accelerates murine BCC carcinogenesis

On the basis of the known role of HH signaling in BCC carcinogenesis and on this newly reported HH-inhibitory function of vitamin D3, we have studied whether vitamin D3, its precursor, and its hydroxylated derivatives can inhibit cellular proliferation and downregulate HH signaling in established murine BCC cell lines and in murine BCCs in vivo. We then investigated whether the anti-BCC effects of vitamin D3 are mediated via the classic VDR pathway.

Results

In vitro studies

Vitamin D3 inhibits proliferation of BCC cell lines.

We treated an established murine BCC cell line (ASZ), a murine nontumorigenic keratinocyte cell line (C5N), and a murine medulloblastoma cell line (Med1) with upregulated HH signaling (25) with cyclopamine or vitamin D3 and assessed cellular proliferation after 48 hours. As we found previously, the classical HH inhibitor cyclopamine decreases Med1 and ASZ proliferation at 5 and 10 μmol/L, respectively, but does not decrease C5N cell proliferation (Fig. 1A; ref. 26). Vitamin D3 similarly inhibits the proliferation of ASZ and Med1 cells by more than 80% although not significantly inhibiting the proliferation of C5N cells (Fig. 1A). Vitamin D3 also inhibits the proliferation of 2 other BCC cell lines (BSZ and CSZ) that were established from BCC tumors from Ptch1+/− mice with keratinocyte deletion of p53 (Fig. 1B). Neither the vitamin D3 precursor 7-dehydrocholesterol (7DHC) nor the hydroxylated forms 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D consistently inhibit proliferation of BCC cells. We tested lower concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D because of the nonspecific cell toxicity of concentrations greater than 1 μmol/L (27). Thus, vitamin D3 specifically inhibits the proliferation of all 3 BCC cell lines tested.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Vitamin D3 (vitD3) is a potent inhibitor of cellular proliferation and Gli1 mRNA (n = 3 experiments). A, cellular proliferation studies were conducted in a BCC cell line (ASZ), nontumorigenic keratinocytes (C5N), and a medulloblastoma cell line (Med1) incubated for 48 hours with cyclopamine (CPN) versus 1,25(OH)2D and vitamin D3. Mean ± SEM; *, P < 0.01 compared with C5N. B, cellular proliferation was assayed in BCC cell lines (ASZ, BSZ, CSZ) and nontumorigenic keratinocytes (C5N) 48 hours after treatment. Mean ± SEM; *, P < 0.01 compared with C5N. C, 24-hydroxylase mRNA relative expression in ASZ cells treated with 7DHC (10 μmol/L), 25(OH)D (10 μmol/L), 1,25(OH)2D (0.1 μmol/L), vitamin D3 (10 μmol/L), and CPN (10 μmol/L) at 24 and 48 hours. Mean ± SEM; *, P < 0.01 compared with control (DMSO or EtOH). D, Gli1 mRNA relative expression in ASZ cells treated with 7DHC (10 μmol/L), 25(OH)D (10 μmol/L), 1,25(OH)2D (0.1 μmol/L), vitamin D3 (10 μmol/L), and CPN (10 μmol/L) at 24 and 48 hours. Mean ± SEM; *, P < 0.01 compared with control (DMSO or EtOH).

Vitamin D3 decreases Gli1 mRNA expression in BCC cell lines.

To address the mechanism by which vitamin D3 inhibits ASZ proliferation, we next measured mRNA levels of the HH target gene Gli1 and of the VDR target gene 25-yydroxyvitamin D-24-hydroxylase (24-hydroxylase, CYP24) in ASZ cells incubated with vitamin D3, 7DHC, 25(OH)D, or 1,25(OH)2D for 24 or 48 hours. Vitamin D3, 25(OH)D, and 1,25(OH)2D each increased 24-hydroxylase mRNA levels. This was expected, as normal human keratinocytes and BCCs can convert vitamin D3 to 25(OH)D and then to the VDR-activating 1,25(OH)2D (refs. 9, 28; Fig. 1C). In contrast, 7DHC fails to increase 24-hydroxylase levels, because UV is required to convert 7DHC to vitamin D3. As expected, cyclopamine does not affect 24-hydroxylase mRNA levels. Similar to prior reports (26), cyclopamine at 10 μmol/L decreases Gli1 mRNA by 3- to 5-fold at 24 and 48 hours after incubation (Fig. 1D). Vitamin D3 treatment at the same concentration (10 μmol/L) also decreases Gli1 mRNA by 3- to 4-fold at 24 and 48 hours. In contrast, 7DHC (10 μmol/L), 25(OH)D (10 μmol/L), and 1,25(OH)2D (0.10 μmol/L) each fail to reduce Gli1 mRNA significantly. Our finding that 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D can activate VDR (as indicated by increased expression of the VDR target gene 24-hydroxylase), without significantly reducing Gli1 mRNA is consistent with Bijlsma and colleagues' data in other test systems indicating that vitamin D3's inhibition of the HH pathway is independent of VDR. Importantly, our finding that concentrations of 25(OH)D and of 1,25(OH)2D that did not affect murine BCC cell growth did upregulate VDR target gene expression is consistent with the effect on proliferation being independent of the VDR.

Vitamin D3 decreases Gli1 mRNA expression independent of the vitamin D3 receptor.

To investigate further the requirement of VDR signaling for the effect of vitamin D3, we incubated ASZ cells with a viral construct expressing short hairpin RNA (shRNA) against VDR (shVDR) for 3 days, and then treated these cells with 5 μmol/L of vitamin D3 for 24 hours (n = 3 experiments). This construct infected approximately 80% to 90% of cells as measured by the expression of red fluorescence (Fig. 2A). Western blot analysis indicated that shVDR infection reduced VDR protein levels by approximately 75% as compared with VDR protein levels in cells infected with a virus expressing a random oligo (Fig. 2B). To assess the effectiveness of shVDR on VDR function, we measured 24-hydroxylase mRNA levels by quantitative PCR (qPCR) in cells treated with vitamin D3. Vitamin D3 increased 24-hydroxylase mRNA by at least 20-fold in ASZ cells previously treated with the control shRNA. Vitamin D3 increased 24-hydroxylase levels in ASZ cells pretreated with shVDR by a much lower amount (Fig. 2C). By contrast, pretreatment with shVDR failed to affect vitamin D3's decrease in Gli1 mRNA levels (Fig. 2C). Furthermore, vitamin D3 inhibited proliferation of ASZ cells pretreated with shVDR or control vector (Fig. 2D). These results were similar when shVDR was knocked down in a second cell line (BSZ, data not shown).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Anti-BCC effects mediated by vitamin D3 are intact when vitamin D3 receptor is blocked (n = 3 experiments). A, phase contrast and fluorescence images for ASZ cells treated with control, shVDR, or no treatment for 72 hours. B, top, Western blot showing VDR and β-actin protein levels in ASZ cells treated with shVDR or control; bottom, quantitation of VDR protein level relative to β-actin in ASZ cells treated with shVDR or control. Mean ± SEM. C, comparison of relative 24-hydroxylase and Gli1 mRNA in ASZ cells pretreated with control vector or shVDR, and then exposed to vitamin D3 (5 μmol/L) for 24 hours. Mean ± SD. Note: the y-axis scale is different from Figure 1C and D. D, cellular proliferation in ASZ cells pretreated with no treatment, control vector, shVDR, and then exposed to vitamin D3 (Vit D3) at 5 μmol/L for 24 hours. Proliferation was assessed as percent of control ASZ cells without vitamin D3 treatment. Mean ± SD.

In vivo studies

Vitamin D3 decreases proliferation but does not affect differentiation in BCC tumors in vivo.

To test the in vivo effects of vitamin D3 on BCC tumors, we next utilized our murine model in which treatment with ionizing radiation (IR) at age 8 weeks induces BCC carcinogenesis. Specifically, our IR-treated Ptch1+/−K14-CreER2 p53 fl/fl mice treated with tamoxifen at age 6 weeks to activate Cre and thereby delete keratinocyte p53 develop multiple visible BCC tumors starting at age 5 to 6 months. These murine BCC tumors histologically resemble nodular human BCCs [Fig. 3A (a)]; and similar to BCCs in Ptch1+/− p53 wild-type mice (16) these tumors express the basal cell marker keratin 14 [Fig. 3A (b)] but not the suprabasalar differentiation marker keratin 10 [Fig. 3A (c)], and have a high level of proliferation as measured by positive staining for Ki67 [Fig.3A (e and f)]. As expected for cells lacking p53, they do not express the apoptosis marker cleaved caspase 3 [CC3; Fig. 3A (d)].

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

A, histology of BCCs treated topically with acetone (control) for 30 days (a–f) or with topical 1.3 mg/kg vitamin D3 for 30 days (g–l). β-Gal and hematoxylin and eosin staining for acetone or vitamin D3 treated BCC (a, g). BCCs from Ptch1+/- K14-Cre-ER p53 fl/fl mice stain blue due to β-gal activity which is encoded by the lacZ gene that was inserted to replace the wild-type Ptch1 gene. Keratinocyte markers of differentiation, K14 (B, H) and K10 (c, i), are shown, and also shown is CC3, a marker of apoptosis (d, j) and Ki67 for proliferation (e, f, k, l). Scale bars, 100 μm. B, levels of Ki67 staining in BCC tumors treated with either acetone (control, n = 7) or vitamin D3 (1.3 mg/kg, n = 10) for 30 days (P < 0.05).

We applied acetone without (n = 7) or with 1.3 mg/kg vitamin D3 (n = 10) to visible BCCs daily for approximately 30 days [Fig. 3A (g–l)]. Treated BCCs continue to express keratin14 [Fig. 3A (h)] but not keratin10 [Fig. 3A (i)], suggesting that vitamin D3 does not induce differentiation of BCC cells. However, topical vitamin D3 treatment markedly decreases cellular proliferation as shown by reduction of Ki67 staining [P = 0.02; Fig. 3A (k and l) and B]. Topical D3 did not affect apoptosis as assessed by the low number of brown staining CC3-positive cells relative to background staining [Fig. 3A (d vs. j)]. These topical applications of vitamin D3 to BCCs and their surrounding skin were sufficient to increase circulating levels of 25(OH)D by approximately 4-fold (210 ± 160 vs. 50 ± 12 ng/mL, P < 0.01).

Topical vitamin D3 decreases Gli1 mRNA level in BCC tumors in vivo.

We also treated murine nodular BCCs with topical acetone (n = 9) or with topical vitamin D3 (2.6 mg/kg; n = 24) daily for 4 days and measured changes in mRNA expression of Gli1 and 24-hydroxylase. Topical vitamin D3 reduced Gli1 mRNA levels (Fig. 4A) and induced significant increases in skin 24-hydroxylase mRNA (Fig. 4B). We found no correlation between suppression of Gli1 mRNA levels and increase of 24-hydroxylase mRNA levels (R = 0.2, P = 0.28), consistent with the idea that vitamin D3 inhibition of HH signaling is independent of VDR. Topical application of a 1,25(OH)2D analog (calcipotriene; Dovonex cream, Leo Pharmaceuticals) used clinically for treatment of psoriasis did not significantly alter Gli1 mRNA but induced significant increases in skin 24-hydroxylase mRNA (Fig. 4C and D). However, calcipotriene cream, similar to topical vitamin D3, also decreases Ki67 staining in BCC tumor cells (1.7 ± 1.0 vs. 2.8 ± 1.0, calcipotriene vs. control cream, respectively; P = 0.02).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Vitamin D3 (VitD3) decreases Gli1 and increases 24-hydroxylase in murine BCCs in vivo. A, relative mRNA level of Gli1 in total RNA from BCC tumors treated with either acetone (n = 9) or vitamin D3 (2.6 mg/kg; n = 24) for 4 days. B, relative mRNA level of 24-hydroxylase in total RNA from BCC tumors treated with either acetone (n = 12) or vitamin D3 (2.6 mg/kg; n = 24). C, relative mRNA level of Gli1 in total RNA from BCC tumors treated with either control cream (n = 9) or 1,25(OH)2D analog cream, calcipotriene (n = 9) for 4 days. D, relative mRNA level of 24-hydroxylase in total RNA from BCC tumors treated with either control (n = 7) cream or 1,25(OH)2D analog cream, calcipotriene (n = 7).

Discussion

We have assessed the effects of vitamin D3 on carcinogenesis by using BCCs because this is the tumor in which aberrant HH signaling is most clearly the pivotal molecular abnormality. Our findings in BCC tumor cell lines in vitro and in BCC tumors in vivo are highly consistent with findings in noncancer assays used by Bijlsma and colleagues (29) to identify anti-HH effects of vitamin D3 that are independent of the VDR. They suggest that nonhydroxylated vitamin D3 may have therapeutic potential as an inhibitor of BCC carcinogenesis—as a chemopreventive and/or a chemotherapeutic agent. Others have noted the structural similarity between the Smo inhibitor cyclopamine and sterols such as vitamin D3 (30).

Furthermore, our findings suggest a more complex role for UV radiation in BCC carcinogenesis than has been considered previously. The evidence that sunlight enhances BCC risk is well accepted. In fact, a significant proportion of PTCH1 and p53 gene mutations in human BCCs are of the UVB-signature type (31–33). As an additional mechanism by which sunlight might enhance BCC carcinogenesis, UV radiation is known to be immunosuppressive, and there is some evidence for a role for the immune system in protecting against BCC carcinogenesis (34). However, details of the relationship between sunlight and BCC risk have been confusing, unlike the more straightforward relationship between sunlight and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) risk. Thus the relative risk for BCCs peaks at a lifetime exposure of 10,000–35,000 hours whereas that for SCCs, which are not known to be driven by HH activation, continues to rise with more hours of sunlight (35, 36). Were UVB not only to stimulate BCC carcinogenesis via mutagenesis and immunosuppression but also to increase cutaneous vitamin D3, thus blocking HH signaling and thereby inhibiting BCC growth, this might provide at least a partial explanation for the less than straightforward relationship between sun exposure and BCC risk. However, other mechanisms also may contribute to the complex relationship. Thus despite our knockdown data, the VDR itself, even without the 1,25(OH)2D ligand may affect BCC carcinogenesis, as illustrated by the development of BCCs in VDR−/− mice treated with 7,12 dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (37). One possible mechanism for this could be the non–1,25(OH)2D-dependent effect of VDR on Wnt signaling, which seems to function downstream of HH signaling in BCCs (38, 39). Our data do not exclude possible anticancer effects of vitamin D3 acting via the canonical VDR pathway in tumor and/or stromal cells because the topical 1,25(OH)2D analog also decreases Ki67 measured tumor proliferation.

Collectively, our data show that pharmacologic doses of vitamin D3 can block proliferation of murine BCC cell lines in vitro and block proliferation in BCC tumors in vivo. We do not know the ultimate effect of vitamin D3 on long-term tumor proliferation studies or tumor induction, and we do not know the role of endogenous physiologic doses of vitamin D3 in the HH pathway or BCC development. However, our findings suggest a mechanism underlying the latitudinal gradient for cancers of the colon, breast, and prostate and even a nonsunlight approach to their prevention. Indeed, we are testing this possibility in mouse models of visceral cancer as well as extending our murine BCC studies.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines

Use of the murine BCC cell lines (ASZ, BSZ, and CSZ), the mouse medulloblastoma cell line Med-1, and the immortalized nontumorigenic murine keratinocyte cell line C5N were as described previously (25, 26). The ASZ cell line was generated from a nodular BCC tumor from an IR-exposed Ptch1+/− mouse (26). The BSZ and CSZ cell lines were generated from nodular BCCs from Ptch1+/−K14-CreER p53 fl/fl mice treated with tamoxifen to delete p53. A murine medulloblastoma cell line (Med1) was maintained and propagated in 154-CF medium (Cascade Biologics) and the C5N cell line was generated from murine epidermis and maintained in DMEM H-21medium (UCSF Cell Culture Facility; ref. 25).

Ptch1+/−K14CreER p53 fl/fl mice

We bred mice with the K14-Cre-ER transgene (40) and mice with a floxed p53 allele (41) with our Ptch1+/− mice to generate Ptch1+/−K14-Cre-ER p53 fl/fl mice. We treated these mice intraperitoneally at age 6 weeks with 100 μg/day of tamoxifen for 3 consecutive days. At 8 weeks of age, Ptch1+/−K14-Cre-ER p53 fl/fl mice were exposed to 4 Gy of IR. Mice were fed a 1% calcium Teklad Global 18% Protein Rodent Diet 2918 Irradiated, containing 1.5 IU/g vitamin D3 from Harlan Laboratories (Teklad Diets). Mice were housed in a barrier facility with 12 hour light–dark cycles by using fluorescent bulbs emitting undetectable UV.

Vitamin D3 treatments

Vitamin D3, 7DHC, 25(OH)D, or 1,25(OH)2D (Sigma Aldrich) were solubilized in 100% ethanol for cell culture experiments. Stocks were stored at −80ºC for up to 2 months at 33 mmol/L. KAAD-cyclopamine (Toronto Research Chemicals Inc.; catalog no. K171000) was dissolved in 100% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and stored at −80ºC for up to 2 months at 10 mmol/L. For topical treatment of BCC tumors in vivo, 1.3 to 2.6 mg/kg (equivalent to 1,500–3,000 IU) of vitamin D3 was applied daily to the tumors. Approximately 200 μL of the vitamin D3/acetone solution was applied to visible BCCs on 20 cm2 area of dorsal back skin for 5 days per week for 30 days (1.3 mg/kg for changes in immunohistochemistry studies, Ki67) or 2.6 mg/kg daily for 4 days (for changes in Gli1 mRNA). Commercially available 1,25(OH)2D analog cream (Dovonex; calcipotriene 0.005%) was donated by Leo Pharmaceuticals.

Cell proliferation assay

Cell numbers were assayed with the WST-1 cell proliferation assay (Roche Applied Science). A total of 7 × 103 cells were seeded in 96-well plates and cultured overnight to 60% to 70% confluency and then serum starved overnight. Cells were incubated with vitamin D3, 7DHC, 1,25(OH)2D, or cyclopamine at various concentrations for 48 hours and colorimetric readings were measured at 450 nmol/L on a microplate reader, SpectraMax 340PC (Molecular Devices) as previously described (26).

Quantitative PCR for Gli1 and 24-hydroxylase mRNA expression

RNA was collected by using the PureLink RNA mini kit (Invitrogen). Reverse transcription was done by using the Taqman reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems) and qPCR was done on cDNA by using TaqMan premixed primer probes and reagents from Applied Biosystems. Ribosomal 18S or GAPDH was used as a normalization control for all experiments.

Adenoviral infection of shRNA to knock down the vitamin D3 receptor

The target sequences of shRNAs produced from adenoviral constructs are VDR 5′-CCATTGAGGTCATCATGTT-3′and the nonsilencing control 5′-TGCGTTGCTAGTACCAACT-3′ (42). A total of 1.5 × 105ASZ cells were seeded in Ti-12.5 flasks and infected 4 hours later at a rate of 100 infectious units/cell and grown for 3 days in 154-CF medium containing 2% chelexed FBS, 1× penicillin and streptomycin and 0.05 mmol/L calcium chloride (42). Cells were then serum starved overnight and exposed to vitamin D3 at 5 μmol/L for 24 hours.

Western blotting

Proteins were extracted with Lysis-M reagent (Roche) and protein concentration was measured by using the micro BCA protein kit (Thermo science Pierce). Proteins were resolved by using 4% to 20% precast gradient SDS PAGE gels (Invitrogen), semidry transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore), blocked with 5% milk-TBST, and hybridized overnight at 4°C by using VDR-specific (1:300; Santa Cruz Biotech) or β-actin (1:15,000; Sigma) polyclonal antibody. After incubation with secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (1:2,000; Cell Signaling) for 1 hour at room temperature, signals were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence by using the Supersignal West Femto maximum Sensitivity Substrate Kit (Thermo Scientific Pierce). Relative protein levels were quantified by ImageJ software.

β-Gal staining and immunohistochemistry

LacZ-encoded bacterial β-galactosidase (β-gal) was detected by incubation of glutaraldehyde and formalin fixed tissue with X-gal (Roche Applied Science; ref. 43). Mouse tissues were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 5-μm sections. Sections were deparaffinized in xylene and antigen retrieval was carried out in Trilogy solution (Cell Marque) by heating. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide and endogenous biotin was blocked by avidin biotin blocking system (Vector Laboratories). Sections were also blocked with normal goat serum (Vector Laboratories). Biotinylated goat anti-rabbit (Vector Laboratories) was used to detect the primary antibody and was followed by incubation with the Vectastain avidin biotin complex kit (Vector Laboratories) and visualized with liquid 3,3′-diaminobenzidin and substrate chromogen system (Dako). Antibodies used included control rabbit immunoglobulin (1:250 dilution) and rabbit anti-mouse polyclonal antibody against K10 (1:500 dilution; Covance), rabbit anti-mouse polyclonal antibody against K14 (1:2,000 dilution; Covance), rabbit anti-mouse polyclonal antibody against CC3 (1:800 dilution; Pharmingen; overnight at 4°C), and rabbit anti-mouse polyclonal antibody against Ki67 (1:400; Thermo Scientific; 60 minutes at room temperature). Ki67 staining per tumor was ranked from lowest to highest (0–4) by 2 independent readers blinded to the treatment group.

Statistical analysis

Nonparametric t test and Spearman's correlation test were used to compare the difference in mean values and correlations of Gli1 and 24-hydroxylase mRNA levels, respectively. All P values reported are 2-sided.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Grant Support

This work was supported by the National Institute of Health (CA81888 and CN-95116 to E.H. Epstein) and the NIH/NCRR/OD UCSF-CTSI KL2 RR024130, NIH/NIAMS K23 AR056736-01 and Prevent Cancer Foundation to J.Y. Tang.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

We thank Allan Balmain for the C5N cell line, Pierre Chambon and Anton Berns for supplying the K14-CreER2 and p53 fl alleles, and Loretta Chan for her assistance with the hematoxylin–eosin staining and immunohistochemistry staining.

  • Received October 15, 2010.
  • Revision received December 28, 2010.
  • Accepted February 1, 2011.
  • ©2011 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Apperly F
    . The relation of solar radiation to cancer mortality in North America. Cancer Res 1941;1:191–5.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Garland F,
    2. Garland C,
    3. Gorham E,
    4. Young J
    . Geographic variation in breast cancer mortality in the United States: a hypothesis involving exposure to solar radiation. Prev Med 1990;19:614–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Garland C,
    2. Garland F,
    3. Gorham E,
    4. Lipkin M,
    5. Newmark H,
    6. Mohr SB,
    7. et al.
    The role of vitamin D in cancer prevention. Am J Public Health 2006;96:252–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Wactawski-Wende J,
    2. Kotchen JM,
    3. Anderson GL,
    4. Assaf AR,
    5. Brunner RL,
    6. O'Sullivan MJ,
    7. et al.
    Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006;354:684–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lappe JM,
    2. Travers-Gustafson D,
    3. Davies KM,
    4. Recker RR,
    5. Heaney RP
    . Vitamin D and calcium supplementation reduces cancer risk: results of a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85:1586–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Garland C,
    2. Shekelle RB,
    3. Barrett-Connor E,
    4. Criqui MH,
    5. Rossof AH,
    6. Paul O
    . Dietary vitamin D and calcium and risk of colorectal cancer: a 19-year prospective study in men. Lancet 1985;1:307–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Mokady E,
    2. Schwartz B,
    3. Shany S,
    4. Lamprecht SA
    . A protective role of dietary vitamin D3 in rat colon carcinogenesis. Nutr Cancer 2000;38:65–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Spina CS,
    2. Tangpricha V,
    3. Uskokovic M,
    4. Adorinic L,
    5. Maehr H,
    6. Holick MF
    . Vitamin D and cancer. Anticancer Res 2006;26:2515–24.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bikle DD
    . Vitamin D receptor, UVR, and skin cancer: a potential protective mechanism. J Invest Dermatol 2008;128:2357–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Holick MF
    . Calcium plus vitamin D and the risk of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2287–8; author reply 2287-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Holick MF
    . Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med 2007;357:266–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Bijlsma MF,
    2. Spek CA,
    3. Zivkovic D,
    4. van de Water S,
    5. Rezaee F,
    6. Peppelenbosch MP
    . Repression of smoothened by patched-dependent (pro-)vitamin D3 secretion. PLoS Biol 2006;4:1397–410.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Nolan-Stevaux O,
    2. Lau J,
    3. Truitt ML,
    4. Chu GC,
    5. Hebrok M,
    6. Fernández-Zapico ME,
    7. et al.
    GLI1 is regulated through Smoothened-independent mechanisms in neoplastic pancreatic ducts and mediates PDAC cell survival and transformation. Genes Dev 2009;23:24–36.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Von Hoff DD,
    2. LoRusso PM,
    3. Rudin CM,
    4. Reddy JC,
    5. Yauch RL,
    6. Tibes R,
    7. et al.
    Inhibition of the hedgehog pathway in advanced basal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1164–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Miller DL,
    2. Weinstock MA
    . Nonmelanoma skin cancer in the United States: incidence. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;30:774–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Aszterbaum M,
    2. Epstein J,
    3. Oro A,
    4. Douglas V,
    5. LeBoit PE,
    6. Scott MP,
    7. et al.
    Ultraviolet and ionizing radiation enhance the growth of BCCs and trichoblastomas in patched heterozygous knockout mice. Nat Med 1999;5:1285–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Hahn H,
    2. Wicking C,
    3. Zaphiropoulous PG,
    4. Gailani MR,
    5. Shanley S,
    6. Chidambaram A,
    7. et al.
    Mutations of the human homolog of Drosophila patched in the nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome. Cell 1996;85:841–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Johnson RL,
    2. Rothman AL,
    3. Xie J,
    4. Goodrich LV,
    5. Bare JW,
    6. Bonifas JM,
    7. et al.
    Human homolog of patched, a candidate gene for the basal cell nevus syndrome. Science 1996;272:1668–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  19. 19.↵
    1. Epstein E
    . Basal cell carcinomas: attack of the hedgehog. Nat Rev Cancer 2008;8:743–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Jacob L,
    2. Lum L
    . Hedgehog signaling pathway. Science Signaling: The Signal Transduction Knowledge Environment 2007;407:cm6.
  21. 21.↵
    1. Tang JY,
    2. So PL,
    3. Epstein EH Jr.
    . Novel Hedgehog pathway targets against basal cell carcinoma. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2007;224:257–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. McMahon AP,
    3. Allen BL
    . Shifting paradigms in Hedgehog signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2007;19:159–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Rady P,
    2. Scinicariello F,
    3. Wagner RF Jr.,
    4. Tyring SK
    . p53 mutations in basal cell carcinomas. Cancer Res 1992;52:3804–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. So PL,
    2. Fujimoto MA,
    3. Epstein EH Jr.
    . Pharmacologic retinoid signaling and physiologic retinoic acid receptor signaling inhibit basal cell carcinoma tumorigenesis. Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7:1275–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. So PL,
    2. Langston AW,
    3. Daniallinia N,
    4. Hebert JL,
    5. Fujimoto MA,
    6. Khaimskiy Y,
    7. et al.
    Long-term establishment, characterization and manipulation of cell lines from mouse basal cell carcinoma tumors. Exp Dermatol 2006;15:742–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Pillai S,
    2. Bikle DD
    . Adenosine triphosphate stimulates phosphoinositide metabolism, mobilizes intracellular calcium, and inhibits terminal differentiation of human epidermal keratinocytes. J Clin Invest 1992;90:42–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Bikle DD
    . Vitamin D regulated keratinocyte differentiation. J Cell Biochem 2004;92:436–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Bijlsma MF,
    2. Peppelenbosch MP,
    3. Spek CA
    . (Pro-)vitamin D as treatment option for hedgehog-related malignancies. Med Hypotheses 2008;70:202–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Corcoran RB,
    2. Scott MP
    . Oxysterols stimulate Sonic hedgehog signal transduction and proliferation of medulloblastoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:8408–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Aszterbaum M,
    2. Rothman A,
    3. Johnson RL,
    4. Fisher M,
    5. Xie J,
    6. Bonifas JM,
    7. et al.
    Identification of mutations in the human PATCHED gene in sporadic basal cell carcinomas and in patients with the basal cell nevus syndrome. J Invest Dermatol 1998;110:885–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Reifenberger J,
    2. Wolter M,
    3. Knobbe CB,
    4. Köhler B,
    5. Schönicke A,
    6. Scharwächter C,
    7. et al.
    Somatic mutations in the PTCH, SMOH, SUFUH and TP53 genes in sporadic basal cell carcinomas. Br J Dermatol 2005;152:43–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Ling G,
    2. Ahmadian A,
    3. Persson A,
    4. Undén AB,
    5. Afink G,
    6. Williams C,
    7. et al.
    PATCHED and p53 gene alterations in sporadic and hereditary basal cell cancer. Oncogene 2001;20:7770–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Vogt A,
    2. Chuang PT,
    3. Hebert J,
    4. Hwang J,
    5. Lu Y,
    6. Kopelovich L,
    7. et al.
    Immunoprevention of basal cell carcinomas with recombinant hedgehog-interacting protein. J Exp Med 2004;199:753–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Kricker A,
    2. Armstrong BK,
    3. English DR,
    4. Heenan PJ
    . Does intermittent sun exposure cause basal cell carcinoma? A case-control study in western Australia. Int J Cancer 1995;60:489–94.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Rosso S,
    2. Zanetti R,
    3. Martinez C,
    4. Tormo MJ,
    5. Schraub S,
    6. Sancho-Garnier H,
    7. et al.
    The multicentre south European study ‘Helios’ II: different sun exposure patterns in the aetiology of basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin. Br J Cancer 1996;73:1447–54.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Zinser GM,
    2. Sundberg JP,
    3. Welsh J
    . Vitamin D(3) receptor ablation sensitizes skin to chemically induced tumorigenesis. Carcinogenesis 2002;23:2103–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Palmer HG,
    2. Anjos-Afonso F,
    3. Carmeliet G,
    4. Takeda H,
    5. Watt FM
    . The vitamin D receptor is a wnt effector that controls hair follicle differentiation and specifies tumor type in adult epidermis. PLoS One 2008;3:e1483.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Yang SH,
    2. Andl T,
    3. Grachtchouk V,
    4. Wang A,
    5. Liu J,
    6. Syu LJ,
    7. et al.
    Pathological responses to oncogenic Hedgehog signaling in skin are dependent on canonical Wnt/[beta]-catenin signaling. Nat Genet 2008;40:1130–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Metzger D,
    2. Li M,
    3. Chambon P
    . Targeted somatic mutagenesis in the mouse epidermis. Methods Mol Biol 2005;289:329–40.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    1. Jonkers J,
    2. Meuwissen R,
    3. Van Der Gulden H,
    4. Peterse H,
    5. Van Der Valk M,
    6. Berns A
    . Synergistic tumor suppressor activity of BRCA2 and p53 in a conditional mouse model for breast cancer. Nat Genet 2001;29:418–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Hawker NP,
    2. Pennypacker SD,
    3. Chang SM,
    4. Bikle DD
    . Regulation of human epidermal keratinocyte differentiation by the vitamin D receptor and its coactivators DRIP205, SRC2, and SRC3. J Invest Dermatol 2007;127:874–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. So PL,
    2. Lee K,
    3. Hebert J,
    4. Walker P,
    5. Lu Y,
    6. Hwang J,
    7. et al.
    Topical tazarotene chemoprevention reduces Basal cell carcinoma number and size in Ptch1+/- mice exposed to ultraviolet or ionizing radiation. Cancer Res 2004;64:4385–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Prevention Research: 4 (5)
May 2011
Volume 4, Issue 5
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Prevention Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vitamin D3 Inhibits Hedgehog Signaling and Proliferation in Murine Basal Cell Carcinomas
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Prevention Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Prevention Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Vitamin D3 Inhibits Hedgehog Signaling and Proliferation in Murine Basal Cell Carcinomas
Jean Y. Tang, Tony Zheng Xiao, Yuko Oda, Kris S. Chang, Elana Shpall, Angela Wu, Po-Lin So, Jennifer Hebert, Daniel Bikle and Ervin H. Epstein Jr.
Cancer Prev Res May 1 2011 (4) (5) 744-751; DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0285

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Vitamin D3 Inhibits Hedgehog Signaling and Proliferation in Murine Basal Cell Carcinomas
Jean Y. Tang, Tony Zheng Xiao, Yuko Oda, Kris S. Chang, Elana Shpall, Angela Wu, Po-Lin So, Jennifer Hebert, Daniel Bikle and Ervin H. Epstein Jr.
Cancer Prev Res May 1 2011 (4) (5) 744-751; DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0285
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Oral Health and Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers
  • HCC Early Detection
  • Utility of Germline SNPs in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Prevention Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Prevention Research
eISSN: 1940-6215
ISSN: 1940-6207

Advertisement