Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Article

Cervical Microbiota Associated with Higher Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women Infected with High-Risk Human Papillomaviruses

Chandrika J. Piyathilake, Nicholas J. Ollberding, Ranjit Kumar, Maurizio Macaluso, Ronald D. Alvarez and Casey D. Morrow
Chandrika J. Piyathilake
1Department of Nutrition Sciences, The University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: piyathic@uab.edu
Nicholas J. Ollberding
2Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ranjit Kumar
3University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Center for Clinical & Translational Science.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maurizio Macaluso
2Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald D. Alvarez
4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UAB, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Casey D. Morrow
5Department of Cell Developmental and Integrative Biology, UAB, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-15-0350 Published May 2016
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

It is increasingly recognized that microbes that reside in and on human body sites play major roles in modifying the pathogenesis of several diseases, including cancer. However, specific microbes or microbial communities that can be mechanistically linked to cervical carcinogenesis remain largely unexplored. The purpose of the study was to examine the association between cervical microbiota and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2+) in women infected with high-risk (HR) human papillomaviruses (HPV) and to assess whether the cervical microbiota are associated with oxidative DNA damage as indicated by the presence of cervical cells positive for 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine. The study included 340 women diagnosed with CIN 2+ (cases) and 90 diagnosed with CIN 1 (non-cases). Microbiota composition was determined by Illumina sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene amplified from DNA extracted from cervical mucus samples. Measures of alpha/beta-diversity were not associated with either CIN severity or oxidative DNA damage. However, a cervical mucosal community type (CT) dominated by L. iners and unclassified Lactobacillus spp. was associated with CIN 2+ (OR = 3.48; 95% CI, 1.27–9.55). Sequence reads mapping to Lactobacillaceae, Lactobacillus, L. reuteri, and several sub–genus level Lactobacillus operational taxonomic units were also associated with CIN 2+ when examined independently (effect size >2.0; P < 0.05). Our 16S rRNA sequencing results need confirmation in independent studies using whole-genome shotgun sequencing and that would allow sharpening the suggested associations at finer taxonomic levels. Our results provide little evidence that DNA oxidative damage mediates the effect of the microbiome on the natural history of HPV infection and CIN severity. Cancer Prev Res; 9(5); 357–66. ©2016 AACR.

Introduction

The human microbiome is gaining attention as a factor in health and disease, including cancer. The gut microbiome is the best characterized and implicated in carcinogenesis in the gut (1) and liver by translocation of bacterial metabolites or systemic inflammation (2). Microbial communities in other anatomical sites may alter cancer risk (3, 4). Studies have demonstrated that microbiota influence cancer susceptibility and progression by modulating inflammation, inducing oxidative stress, and promoting genomic instability of the host cells (5, 6).As the bacterial density is high in mucous membranes, microbiota may also play a role in the development of precancerous or cancerous lesions of the uterine cervix. High-risk (HR) human papillomaviruses (HPV) cause high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2+), the precursor of invasive cervical cancer (ICC), but only a small proportion of women infected with HR-HPVs develop CIN 2+. It is important to identify the factors that may alter the natural history of HR-HPV infection.

As the microbiome influences acquisition and pathogenicity of viral infections in the gut (7, 8), the same may occur in the genital tract. Bacterial vaginosis (BV), a condition characterized by a decrease in Lactobacillus with a concomitant increase in anaerobic bacteria (e.g., Gardnerella, Prevotella, and Clostridiales; ref. 9), is associated with increased risk of acquisition, reactivation, or delayed clearance of HPV infection (9–11). Previous studies, however, have relied only on Gram stain to assess BV. Vaginal microbiome sequencing by quantitative PCR showed greater microbiome diversity and a higher prevalence of L. gasseri and Gardnerella vaginalis among HPV-positive women (12). Pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes revealed a lower proportion of Lactobacillus spp. and identified Fusobacteria, including Sneathia spp., as key bacteria among HPV-positive women (13). A recent report also using 16S rRNA sequencing found that a vaginal microbiome dominated by L. gasseri was associated with increased clearance of HPV (14).

The purpose of the current study was to examine the association between the cervicovaginal microbiome and CIN 2+ among women well characterized for HPV infection and histologically confirmed diagnoses of CIN lesions and other risk factors. We also assessed whether the cervical microbiome was associated with the presence of cervical cells positive for 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine [8-OHdG], a marker of oxidative DNA damage.

Materials and Methods

Study population

We evaluated data on 430 women enrolled in two completed studies (R01 CA105448 and R01 CA102489). All patients were diagnosed with abnormal cervical cells by cytology at the Health Departments in Birmingham, AL, and were referred to a colposcopy clinic at the University of Alabama at Birmingham for further examination. Women were 19 to 50 years of age; had no previous history of cervical or other lower genital cancer; no previous hysterectomy, or destructive therapy of the cervix; and were not pregnant. A total of 340 were diagnosed with CIN 2+ [cases, including CIN 2 (n = 208), CIN 3 (n = 132)] and 90 with CIN 1 (non-cases). Both cases and non-cases were positive for HR-HPV (any one of 13 types of HR-HPV, HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, and 68) based on the Roche Diagnostics Linear Array. Pelvic examinations and biopsies were carried out following established protocols. All research procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Collection of data and samples

Age at entry, race, level of education, cigarette smoking, parity, and use of hormonal/oral contraceptives were ascertained via interview with study personnel. Height and weight measurements were obtained using standard protocols and used to calculate the body mass index (BMI). Cervical mucus samples were collected using Merocel ophthalmic sponges (Medtronic Xomed, Inc.) following speculum insertion prior to collecting exfoliated cervical cells. The sponge was placed in the cervical os, with care not to touch the vaginal wall and vulva, allowed to absorb secretions for 60 seconds and placed into a sterile cryovial containing 5 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then placed immediately on ice following collection. Exfoliated cervical cells collected from the transformation zone with a cervical brush were immediately rinsed in 10 mL of PBS and were kept cold. Both sample types were transported to the laboratory on ice within 2 hours of collection. In the laboratory, the sponges suspended in 5 mL of PBS were stored at 80°C. Cervical cell suspensions were separated into two aliquots and centrifuged, and supernatant was removed to obtain cell pellets. One cervical cell pellet used for HPV genotyping was stored in PreservCyt Solution at −20°C. The other cervical cell pellet was fixed by resuspending in 500 μL of 3% formalin and allowed to stand at room temperature for 15 minutes.

Immunohistochemical evaluation of cervical cells for 8-OHdG

The formalin-fixed cervical cell suspension was centrifuged to get a pellet, and supernatant was removed. The cervical cell pellet was again resuspended in PBS and smeared on microscopic slides and allowed to dry out at 37°C for 20 minutes. After drying, slides were placed in 0.01 mol/L citric acid, pH 6.0, and boiled in a pressure cooker set at full power for 10 minutes. After the slides were cooled, they were rinsed in dH2O and placed in 3.5 N HCl for 15 minutes at room temperature to open the DNA. The slides were rinsed with dH2O and treated with 3.0% H2O2 for 5 minutes to quench endogenous peroxidase activity. Slides were incubated with preimmune goat serum (1%) for 1 hour at room temperature to suppress nonspecific staining and then subsequently incubated with 8-OHdG antibody (catalog NWA-8OHdG, 1:500 concentration) for 1 hour at room temperature. All cervical cells on each slide were counted to derive the percentages of cells positive for 8-OHdG.

Isolation of microbial DNA and creation of 16S V4 amplicon library

Microbial DNA was isolated from cervical mucus samples using the Fecal DNA isolation kit from Zymo Research following the manufacturer's instructions. Once the sample DNA was prepared, PCR was used with unique bar-coded primers to amplify the variable region 4 (V4) region of the 16S rRNA gene to create an amplicon library from individual samples (15, 16).

DNA sequencing and bioinformatic processing

The PCR product was ∼255 bases from the V4 segment of the 16S rDNA gene. Paired-end sequencing (2×250) was performed on the Illumina MiSeq (15, 16). FASTQ conversion of the raw data files was performed following de-multiplexing using MiSeq reporter. Quality assessment of the FASTQ files was performed using FASTQC (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) and then quality filtering was done using the FASTX toolkit (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/). High-quality reads (reads where 80% bases have Q score > 20) were selected for analysis, and reads with unknown bases (“N”) were discarded. The remainder of the steps were performed with the Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) suite, version 1.8 as described below (15, 17, 18). Chimeric sequences were filtered with UCHIME using the Ribosomal Database Program (RDP) database (19, 20). Sequences were grouped into operational taxonomic units (OTU) using UCLUST at a similarity threshold of 97% (19). The RDP classifier trained using the Greengenes (v13.8) 16S rRNA database (21) was used to make taxonomic assignments for all OTUs at confidence threshold of 80% (22). OTUs whose average abundance was less than 0.005% were removed (23). Multiple sequence alignment was performed with PyNAST v1.2 (24) and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using FastTree v2.1 (25, 26). A total of 8,600,000 sequences clustered to 652 OTUs were obtained after quality filtering and subsampling to 20k reads. Alpha and beta diversity metrics were calculated as implemented in QIIME (19, 27, 28). Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt; ref. 29) was used to predict Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) orthologs (i.e., functional gene counts) for each sample and to assign inferred gene counts to KEGG pathways.

Statistical analysis

Differences in demographic and clinical characteristics of participants according to CIN status were assessed by t tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables and χ2 tests for categorical variables. Differences in the Chao1 index, Shannon index, and Faith's phylogenetic diversity (α-diversity metrics) according to CIN status were tested by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of the weighted and unweighted Unifrac metrics, as well as the Bray-Curtis, Sorensen, Jaccard, and Morisita-Horn indices (β-diversity), were used to visualize differences in microbial community structure according to CIN and 8-OHdG status. Permutational ANOVA of the distance matrices as implemented by the ADONIS function in the R package vegan (30) was used to test for differences in diversity measures. Non-metric dimensional scaling (NMDS) of the Bray-Curtis and Jaccard distance matrices followed by permutational ANOVA was used to assess differences in the metagenome according to CIN and 8-OHdG status. Although differences in measures of diversity provide evidence that microbial communities are different, it is possible for measures of diversity to be similar while the composition of microbial communities is different. We used a Dirichlet multinomial mixture (DMM) model to partition samples into metacommunities (cervical mucus community types, CT; ref. 31). The method provides a model-based approach to metagenomic clustering that recognizes the discrete nature of the data and uses an evidence-based clustering approach to estimate the number and composition of metacommunities. First, each specimen is considered the result of a sampling process whereby each taxa in the underlying microbial community has a specific probability of being detected, such that the likelihood of the observed sample is derived from a multinomial distribution with a parameter vector representing the probability that each sequence read is from a given taxa. Next, the model uses a Bayesian framework and the Dirichlet distribution as the natural conjugate prior to estimate the parameters of the multinomial sampling distribution of a common, underlying “metacommunity.” The novelty of the model lies in extending the Dirichlet prior to a mixture of Dirichlets and provides the means to view the samples as having been generated by a mixture of metacommunities, facilitating the partitioning of samples into clusters. For this analysis, the DMM model as implemented in Mothur v1.35 (32) was fit to an OTU table aggregated to the genus level to improve clustering. The optimal number of partitions is selected by minimizing the Laplace approximation to the negative log model evidence. The model assigns each sample to one of the CTs (based on its OTU composition) and estimates the weight (i.e., relative frequency, π) and the precision (i.e., a measure inversely related to the degree of dispersion with respect to OTU composition, θ) of each CT. We reviewed the OTU composition of the CTs identified by the DMM model to assess their biological significance, and selected one CT as the referent group, comparing other partitions to the referent. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for CIN2+ and high 8-OHdG status according to cervical mucus CT were calculated using logistic regression. Multivariable models included adjustment for age, BMI, race (non-Hispanic black/non-Hispanic white), education (high school graduate yes/no), parity, hormonal contraceptive use (yes/no), smoking status (current smoker yes/no), and CIN status where appropriate. The indirect effect of CT on CIN 2+ mediated by 8-OHdG was assessed by decomposing the total effect into direct and indirect components and estimating the indirect effect and 95% CI using the PROCESS macro for SAS (33). Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe; ref. 34) and DESeq2 (35) were used to detect differences in OTUs according to CIN and 8-OHdG status. LEfSe was performed on the subsampled OTU table using the default values of α = 0.05 and LDA = 2.0. The negative binomial regression model implemented in DESEq2 was fit to the raw counts adjusting for factors contributing to CIN risk (covariates described above). Log2fold changes for OTUs with false discovery rate (FDR) corrected P < 0.05 are reported. LEfSe was also used to assess enrichment in imputed genes and gene pathways according to CIN and 8-OHdG status.

Results

Participant characteristics

Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants according to CIN status are provided in Table 1. The mean (±SD) age of participants was 26.1 (±4.7) years. The majority were non-Hispanic black (53%), had more than a high school education (81%), were not current smokers (53%), and were current users of hormonal contraceptives (84%). Mean BMI and parity were 28.0 (±8.0) and 1.3 (±1.0), respectively. CIN 2+ cases were younger, had a lower BMI, and higher rates of HPV 16 infection than CIN 1, non-cases (P < 0.05). The proportion of women classified to cervical mucosa CT, and with HPV 18 infection, did not differ. The proportion of 8-OHdG-positive cells was 43% in CIN 2+ cases and 35% in non-cases (P = 0.062).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Participant characteristics according to CIN status

Cervical mucosa CTs

The DMM model identified four CTs with weights π = (0.15, 0.41, 0.16, 0.28) and precision θ = (7.7, 89.8, 283.0, 55.6). Partition 1 had the lowest precision and was composed of diverse taxa, including unclassified Lactobacillus, L. iners, Bifidobacteriaceae, Clostridiales, and Allobaculum (Fig. 1). Partition 2 was the most prevalent, while Lactobacillus dominated, uniquely characterized by the high diversity and proportion of rare taxa. Partition 3 was the least varied and dominated by unclassified Lactobacillus (43%) and L. iners (40%) organisms. The percentages of sequence reads mapping to L. iners in partitions 1, 2, and 4 were 15%, 8%, and 6%, respectively. Partition 4 was the only CT lacking Lactobacillus dominance and primarily composed of Bifidobacteriaceae, Prevotella, Sneathia, and Megasphaera. Based on a priori considerations about the biological potential of these CTs, we considered partition 1 to be “low risk” and selected it as the referent group, and compared the other three partitions to the referent. Overall, Lactobacillus genera were dominant (represented >5% of all sequence reads) in 55% of samples. The proportion of African American women (67%) was higher in partition 4 compared with Caucasian American women (33%). Age, educational status, BMI, smoking status, parity, use of hormonal contraceptives, and the percentage of women positive for HPV 16 or 18 did not differ by partition (data not shown).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

A, relative bacterial abundance according to cervical mucosa community type (CT) partition. B, ordination of the PCoA performed on the weighted UniFrac metric according to CT (red = partition 1, green = partition 2, turquois = partition 3, blue = partition 4; ADONIS P < 0.001).

Cervical mucus microbiota and CIN status

Alpha-diversity metrics did not differ in cases and non-cases (P > 0.39). Ordinations based on beta-diversity distance matrices and permutational ANOVA (e.g., ADONIS) did not support differences in community structure (Fig. 2). Similar findings were obtained when comparing CIN 3+ with CIN 1 (data not shown). Whereas overall CT partitioning did not significantly differ between CIN 2+ and CIN 1 (Table 1, P = 0.208), pairwise comparisons between “high-risk” CTs and the referent were significant.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

A, linear discriminant effect size (LEfSe) analysis comparing differentially abundant taxa according to CIN status (top 25 shown). OTU classifications: Lactobacillus; unclassified (OTUs 1304722, 1392798, 1457139), L. reuteri (OTU_784413), Bacteroides; unclassified (OTUs 2292732, 318167), RFN20 (OTU_1917058), SR1 (OTU_1644414), P. pseudoalcaligenes (OTU_2111470), Fusobacterium; unclassified (OTU_710268), Ruminococcaceae; unclassified (OTU_205352), Clostridiales; unclassified (OTU_760513). B, ordination of the PCoA performed on the unweighted UniFrac metric. C, LEfSe comparing differentially abundant imputed KEGG pathways according to CIN status.

In unadjusted models, samples clustered to partition 3 had a 2.5-fold higher odds [OR = 2.48 (1.01; 6.07)] of being diagnosed with CIN 2+ when compared with samples clustered to partition 1 (Table 2). The OR increased to 3.5 (1.27; 9.55) in models adjusted for factors contributing to CIN risk. Compared with partition 1, ORs for samples clustered to partition 2 were 1.63 (0.83; 3.21) and 1.84 (0.86; 3.93) for unadjusted and multivariable models, respectively. ORs for CIN 3+ were similar to those obtained for CIN 2+, but failed to achieve statistical significance. The odds of CIN 2+ and CIN 3+ for partition 4 were similar to those for partition 1. In the subset of samples (n = 156) for which 8-OHdG was assayed the odds ratio for the indirect effect of partition 3 operating through 8-OHdG on CIN 2+ was 1.12 (0.88; 2.44; ∼12.5% of total effect mediated; data not shown). Thus, a relatively small proportion of the association between CIN 2+ diagnosis and partition 3 appears to be mediated by oxidative DNA damage. The indirect effect of 8-OHdG was not testable for the other CT partitions.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Odds ratios and 95% CIs for CIN 2+, CIN 3, and 8-OH status according to cervical mucosa community type

LEfSe analyses assessing taxa discriminating on CIN status are shown in Fig. 2 (top 25) and Supplementary Table S1. Samples from CIN 2+ were enriched in Lactobacillaceae, Lactobacillus, L. reuteri and several sub–genus level Lactobacillus OTUs (effect size >2.0; P < 0.05). Bacterial families, including Bacteroidaceae, Porphyromonadacae, and Coxiellaceae; genera, including Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, Rickettsiella, and RFN20; and numerous OTUs (n = 20) were also enriched in CIN 2+ samples. Two OTUs classified to Ruminococcaceae and Clostridiales were enriched in samples obtained from CIN1 non-cases. Similar findings for OTUs were obtained from negative binomial regression after accounting for differences in sequencing depth and adjustment for factors contributing to CIN risk (Supplementary Table S2).

PICRUSt was used to infer the functional metagenomic content of each sample and to classify the inferred genes to KEGG pathways. NMDS of the Bray-Curtis and Jaccard distance matrices and permutational ANOVA did not support differences in the inferred metagenome by CIN status (P = 0.20; Supplementary Fig. S1). LEfSe analysis of the inferred metagenome identified five KO identifiers enriched in women diagnosed with CIN 1, including K02003 (ATP-binding protein), K09687 (antibiotic transport system ATP-binding protein), K02004 (ABC transport system permease protein), K06147 (ATP-binding cassette), and K07133 (unclassified; data not shown). Analysis of inferred functional pathways identified glycosyltransferase enzymes and pyruvate metabolism enriched in CIN 2+ samples and enrichment in alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism; cysteine and methionine metabolism; and phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis in CIN1 (effect size >2.0; P < 0.05; Fig. 2).

Cervical mucus microbiota and 8-OHdG

The percentage of 8-OHdG-positive cervical cells was not associated with microbial diversity when examined as a continuous variable or dichotomized at the median (median = 38.8%; P < 0.23 all models; data not shown). Compared with partition 1, odds ratio for samples clustered to partition 2 and 3 were 2.23 (0.82; 6.70) and 2.61 (0.85; 8.03) in multivariable models, respectively (Table 2). Enrichment in Betaproteobacteria, Burkholderiales, and Rhizobiales; several bacterial families including Psuedomonadaceae, Oxalobacteraceae, Rhizobiacaeae; and several genera including Pseudomonas, Argobacterium, limnohabitans, and Phenylobacterium was found in samples from women with above median values for 8-OHdG (effect size >2.0; P < 0.05; Supplementary Fig. S2). Samples from women with low 8-OHdG levels were enriched in Clostridiaceae. Analysis of imputed metagenomes identified two genes enriched in non-cases including K08884 (serine/threonine protein kinase) and K01897 (long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase). Analysis of the imputed KEGG pathways identified enrichment in two component system, signal transduction, lipid metabolism, transcription factors, secretion system, metabolism of other amino acids, and aminobenzoate degradation in samples from women with a greater percentage of 8-OHdG–positive cells (Supplementary Fig. S2). Enrichment in alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism; terpenoid backbone synthesis; thiamin metabolism; one carbon pool by folate; cysteine and methionine metabolism; translation proteins; amino acid–related enzymes; genetic information processing; and energy metabolism was found for samples from women below the median percentage cells positive for 8-OHdG.

Discussion

We studied a well-characterized group of women to evaluate the association between cervical microbiota and CIN 2+ and to assess whether cervical microbiota are associated with oxidative DNA damage. Measures of alpha- or beta-diversity were not associated with either CIN severity or oxidative DNA damage. A cervical mucosal community type dominated by L. iners and unclassified Lactobacillus spp. was associated with CIN 2+. Sequence reads mapping to Lactobacillaceae, Lactobacillus, L. reuteri, and several sub–genus level Lactobacillus OTUs were also associated with CIN 2+. We found little evidence that DNA oxidative damage mediates the effect of the microbiome on the natural history of HPV infection and CIN severity.

Healthy vaginal flora is described as Lactobacillus dominated with low bacterial diversity and accompanying low pH, while “unhealthy” flora is often characterized by high diversity bacterial populations with increased anaerobic bacteria and lactobacilli present at lower levels (36). High diversity communities are associated with pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations (37). Recent data from diverse human populations have suggested that this characterization is overly simplistic. Anahtar and colleagues recently documented that in a cohort of young, healthy South African women, only 37% had a lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiota (37). Although recent research has clarified host-commensal dynamics in the gastrointestinal tract and to a certain extent in the vaginal microbiome in relation to pregnancy complications and pelvic inflammatory diseases (38–40), much less is understood about the cervical microbiome in relation to cervical cancer risk. This gap must be filled if we want to explore the potential for microbiota-based interventions to prevent cervical cancer.

Microbial communities in the cervical mucosa have not been well studied, and comparing our findings with previous research is problematic. Because of the close proximity of the organs, however, given that the cervicovaginal microbiome plays a role in the acquisition and natural history of HPV infections, it is plausible that the microbial communities of the cervical mucosa modify the risk of developing HR-HPV–associated CIN 2+. No comprehensive studies have evaluated this hypothesis. A study compared Korean women diagnosed with CIN 1 (n = 55) and CIN 2+ (n = 15) with those with normal cytology or ASCUS (n = 50) and reported that a cervical cell microbiome with a predominance of A. vaginae, G. vaginalis, and L. iners and a concomitant paucity of L. crispatus, in combination with oncogenic HPVs, may be a risk factor for cervical neoplasia (41). The study is of limited value because CIN 1 is not a “true” pre-neoplastic lesion, and some of the women diagnosed with ASCUS are likely to have underlying CIN 2+ lesions. Further, the results reported were not adjusted by other risk factors.

We observed that a cervical mucosa CT dominated by L. iners and unclassified Lactobacillus was associated with CIN 2+. Smith and colleagues also observed that cervical microbiota clustered in six distinct CTs, one of which was characterized by a predominance of L. iners (42). L. iners, discovered by Falsen and colleagues (43), has escaped attention because it grows only on blood agar. L. iners–dominated samples have lower concentrations of D-lactic acid, which is protective against infection by pathogens (44). L. iners has also been reported to induce IL8 secretion in vivo and thereby potentially moderate pro-inflammatory activity in the cervix, which may influence CIN progression (36). We did not observe an association between L. iners and CIN 2+ when examining single OTUs, but did so when aggregating taxa to Lactobacillaceae and Lactobacillus, as well as for L. reuteri and several other sub–genus level Lactobacillus OTUs. Thus, if the association between L. iners and CIN 2+ is real, our findings suggest that the broader community structure may influence the effect of L. iners on CIN 2+ risk. Studies incorporating whole-genome shotgun sequencing, finer taxonomic resolution, and metatranscriptomics may provide greater insight into the nature of this association.

The limited precision of the ORs estimated for the cervical mucosa CTs may reflect the inherent challenge of attempting to reduce a high-dimensional community structure to a few clusters. Figure 1 shows clear clustering of samples into CTs, but the large within-CT spread suggests residual variation in community structure. Potential contamination of specimens during sampling, processing, or sequencing may have also reduced our ability to detect associations with CIN 2+. Primer selection and library preparation choices also represent a potential source of bias (45).

On the other hand, clustering may capture the interactions of specific microbes operating in complex community structures that may not be well represented using general diversity measures based on underlying distance matrices, and strengthens the power of our analyses. There is a growing body of literature in the field of microbial ecology pertaining to the use of Dirichlet multinomial models (DMM) to identify naturally occurring clusters of samples based on microbial composition. These methods have been used in numerous studies to cluster samples into "community types" or "enterotypes" (46–49) and readily implemented in commonly used software programs, including Mothur and R (16, 50). DMM clustering provides information that is distinctly different from ordinations performed on dissimilarity matrices, as it is performed directly on read counts (i.e., do not rely on a continuous approximation to the discrete nature of the data), takes into account sequence variation, does not rely on an underlying distance matrix, and is not limited to defining a fixed number of clusters. The DMM described by Holmes and colleagues (31) uses a Bayesian framework to assign samples to the community type for which it has the highest posterior probability of membership with the optimal number of clusters based on minimizing model error. The relative abundance of taxa in each cluster can then be used to facilitate interpretation of major organisms comprising the group. The DMM approach used here has been shown to reveal important CTs when applied to data from the Human Microbiome Project and superior performance to alternative clustering methods (51).

Whereas previous studies have suggested that BV may alter the natural history of HPV infection, in this study, a “BV-like” CT (partition 4) was not associated with CIN 2+. As we did not use conventional BV diagnostic tests, it is possible that women in partition 4 did not have clinical BV. The cervical microbiome of CIN 2+ also tended to be enriched in potentially beneficial microbes such as L. reuteri (52, 53), but also microbes found in the intestinal tract such as Bacteroides, which have been associated with colorectal cancer (54) and cause significant pathology when they escape the intestinal tract (55). In contrast, samples of non-cases were enriched with Ruminococcaceae, one of the most abundant gut Firmicute families associated with good gut health (56, 57) and Clostridia, common gut microbiota involved in the maintenance of gut function (58). In healthy women, microbiota in the gut and cervicovaginal area are confined to the mucosa by a multilevel barrier system that includes a mucus layer, secretion of soluble immune mediators, and intact epithelium with tight junctions. Failure of this barrier may lead to translocation of microbiota (59), possibly inducing inflammation, oxidative DNA damage, and ultimately the development of CIN 2+. Mucin-degrading enzymes secreted by these microbes may destroy the mucosal barrier and increase susceptibility to HPV (60). Many bacterial species colonize both the gastrointestinal and the reproductive tract, and the rectum serves as a reservoir of organisms that colonize the cervicovaginal area (61–63).

Whereas we did not find a statistically significant association between the percentage of cervical cells positive for 8-OHdG and microbial diversity or community structure, OR estimates were >2. We note that the highest percentage of women with above median 8-OHdG was found in partition 3, which was associated with CIN 2+. Thus, a biologically plausible association may exist despite our inconclusive findings. Oxidative DNA damage is an inevitable consequence of cellular metabolism and is increased following toxic insult. 8-OHdG is an established cancer biomarker of oxidative stress (64): elevated levels of 8-OHdG were reported in invasive ductal carcinoma (65), primary breast cancer (66), and colorectal cancer (67) compared with normal cells of the corresponding organ, and in precancerous lesions of the cervix compared with normal cervical epithelial cells (68, 69). Assessing the impact of the cervical microbiota on 8-OHdG levels is important to understand the role of microbial community composition and oxidative stress in the progression of HPV-related cervical lesions. The microbiome influences reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in the gut epithelium (70) and chronically high ROS levels can outpace DNA repair mechanisms, leading to DNA damage (71). In vitro studies have shown that ROS production is associated with 8-OHdG formation and increased DNA damage (72). ROS induce double-strand breaks in the host DNA and in the HPV episome, facilitating integration of the virus and carcinogenesis (63). There is accumulating evidence that microbial metabolites may induce cancer via DNA damage (73).

Glycosyltransferase enzymes and pyruvate metabolism were enriched in CIN 2+ samples. Although aberrant pyruvate metabolism (74) and glycosyltransferases (75) play a role in carcinogenesis, the impact of bacterial pyruvate metabolism on CIN is unclear. Some of the genes identified in non-cases and in women with lower 8-OHdG, such as methionine metabolism, play an important role in the pathway linking folate/vitamin B12 metabolism with DNA methylation and DNA repair: we have previously reported that a higher degree of DNA methylation is inversely associated with CIN 2+ (76). Because the gut microbiome supplies its host with up to a third of the recommended intake of B vitamins (77, 78), and because the rectum is a reservoir for organisms that colonize the vagina, our previous observations could be explained by differences in gut microbial profiles by CIN status. The folate biosynthesis pathway is present in nearly all Bacteroidetes genomes, as well as in most Fusobacteria and Proteobacteria while vitamin B12 synthesis of cobalamin is present in all Fusobacteria, but is rare in Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria (79). Like colonocytes, cervical epithelial cells contain transporters for these micronutrients (80, 81). Thus, cervical microbiota may influence the natural history of HPV infection and CIN by altering the status of these micronutrients in the cervical environment.

Some of the genes identified in women with lower 8-OHdG such as one-carbon pool by folate and methionine metabolism play an important role in the folate metabolic pathway, which contributes to DNA synthesis and repair. It is biologically plausible that pathways such as signal transduction are enriched in women with a greater percentage cells positive for 8-OHdG because DNA damage triggers a signal transduction pathway that appears to be a kinase cascade (82).

In summary, our study did not show an association between microbiome diversity and CIN severity or oxidative DNA damage, but provided suggestive evidence that a cervical microbiome characterized by a predominance of Lactobacillus and L. iners is associated with CIN 2+ in women infected with HR-HPVs. Future studies are needed to confirm our 16S rRNA sequencing results and to resolve associations for specific organisms and at finer taxonomic levels using whole-genome shotgun sequencing together with measures of cervical microbiome-induced molecular pathways that may alter the risk of CIN 2+. Our data suggest that only a small proportion of the effect of the microbiome on CIN may be mediated through oxidative DNA damage.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: C.J. Piyathilake, M. Macaluso

Development of methodology: C.J. Piyathilake, C.D. Morrow

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): C.J. Piyathilake

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): C.J. Piyathilake, N.J. Ollberding, R. Kumar, M. Macaluso, C.D. Morrow

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: C.J. Piyathilake, N.J. Ollberding, R. Kumar, M. Macaluso, R.D. Alvarez, C.D. Morrow

Study supervision: C.J. Piyathilake

Grant Support

This work was supported by grants R21 CA188066 (C. Piyathilake), R01 CA102489 (C. Piyathilake), and R01 CA105448 (C. Piyathilake) of the National Cancer Institute. The following are acknowledged for their support of the Microbiome Resource at the University of Alabama at Birmingham: School of Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center (P30AR050948), Center for AIDS Research (5P30AI027767) and Center for Clinical Translational Science (UL1TR000165).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the excellent technical assistance provided by Peter Eipers, Michelle Moses Chambers, and Suguna Badiga.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Prevention Research Online (http://cancerprevres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received September 22, 2015.
  • Revision received February 10, 2016.
  • Accepted February 28, 2016.
  • ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Feng Q,
    2. Liang S,
    3. Jia H,
    4. Stadlmayr A,
    5. Tang L,
    6. Lan Z,
    7. et al.
    Gut microbiome development along the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Nat Commun 2015;6:6528.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Dapito DH,
    2. Mencin A,
    3. Gwak GY,
    4. Pradere JP,
    5. Jang MK,
    6. Mederacke I,
    7. et al.
    Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell 2012;21:504–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bultman SJ
    . Emerging roles of the microbiome in cancer. Carcinogenesis 2014;35:249–55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Yu Y,
    2. Champer J,
    3. Beynet D,
    4. Kim J,
    5. Friedman AJ
    . The role of the cutaneous microbiome in skin cancer: lessons learned from the gut. J Drugs Dermatol 2015;14:461–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Mangerich A,
    2. Knutson CG,
    3. Parry NM,
    4. Muthupalani S,
    5. Ye W,
    6. Prestwich E,
    7. et al.
    Infection-induced colitis in mice causes dynamic and tissue-specific changes in stress response and DNA damage leading to colon cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:E1820–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Bultman SJ
    . Emerging roles of the microbiome in cancer. Carcinogenesis 2014;35:249–55.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kuss SK,
    2. Best GT,
    3. Etheredge CA,
    4. Pruijssers AJ,
    5. Frierson JM,
    6. Hooper LV,
    7. et al.
    Intestinal microbiota promote enteric virus replication and systemic pathogenesis. Science 2011;334:249–52.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kane M,
    2. Case LK,
    3. Kopaskie K,
    4. Kozlova A,
    5. MacDearmid C,
    6. Chervonsky AV,
    7. et al.
    Successful transmission of a retrovirus depends on the commensal microbiota. Science 2011;334:245–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Fredricks DN,
    2. Fiedler TL,
    3. Marrazzo JM
    . Molecular identification of bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1899–911.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Watts DH,
    2. Fazzari M,
    3. Minkoff H,
    4. Hillier SL,
    5. Sha B,
    6. Glesby M,
    7. et al.
    Effects of bacterial vaginosis and other genital infections on the natural history of human papillomavirus infection in HIV-1-infected and high-risk HIV-1-uninfected women. J Infect Dis 2005;191:1129–39.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. King CC,
    2. Jamieson DJ,
    3. Wiener J,
    4. Cu-Uvin S,
    5. Klein RS,
    6. Rompalo AM,
    7. et al.
    Bacterial vaginosis and the natural history of human papillomavirus. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2011;2011:319460.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Gao W,
    2. Weng J,
    3. Gao Y,
    4. Chen X
    . Comparison of the vaginal microbiota diversity of women with and without human papillomavirus infection: a cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis 2013;13:271.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Lee JE,
    2. Lee S,
    3. Lee H,
    4. Song YM,
    5. Lee K,
    6. Han MJ,
    7. et al.
    Association of the vaginal microbiota with human papillomavirus infection in a Korean twin cohort. PLOS ONE 2013;8:e63514.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Brotman RM,
    2. Shardell MD,
    3. Gajer P,
    4. Tracy JK,
    5. Zenilman JM,
    6. Ravel J,
    7. et al.
    Interplay Between the Temporal Dynamics of the Vaginal Microbiota and Human Papillomavirus Detection. J Infect Dis 2014;210:1723–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kumar R,
    2. Eipers P,
    3. Little RB,
    4. Crowley M,
    5. Crossman DK,
    6. Lefkowitz EJ,
    7. et al.
    Getting started with microbiome analysis: sample acquisition to bioinformatics. Curr Protoc Hum Genet 2014;82:18.8.1–18.8.29.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kozich JJ,
    2. Westcott SL,
    3. Baxter NT,
    4. Highlander SK,
    5. Schloss PD
    . Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013;79:5112–20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lozupone CA,
    2. Hamady M,
    3. Kelley ST,
    4. Knight R
    . Quantitative and qualitative beta diversity measures lead to different insights into factors that structure microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:1576–85.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Navas-Molina JA,
    2. Peralta-Sanchez JM,
    3. Gonzalez A,
    4. McMurdie PJ,
    5. Vazquez-Baeza Y,
    6. Xu Z,
    7. et al.
    Advancing our understanding of the human microbiome using QIIME. Methods Enzymol 2013;531:371–444.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Edgar RC
    . Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2010;26:2460–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Cole JR,
    2. Wang Q,
    3. Fish JA,
    4. Chai B,
    5. McGarrell DM,
    6. Sun Y,
    7. et al.
    Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42 (Database issue):D633–42.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. McDonald D,
    2. Price MN,
    3. Goodrich J,
    4. Nawrocki EP,
    5. DeSantis TZ,
    6. Probst A,
    7. et al.
    An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J 2012;6:610–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Wang Q,
    2. Garrity GM,
    3. Tiedje JM,
    4. Cole JR
    . Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007;73:5261–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Bokulich NA,
    2. Subramanian S,
    3. Faith JJ,
    4. Gevers D,
    5. Gordon JI,
    6. Knight R,
    7. et al.
    Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing. Nature Methods 2013;10:57–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Caporaso JG,
    2. Bittinger K,
    3. Bushman FD,
    4. DeSantis TZ,
    5. Andersen GL,
    6. Knight R
    . PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2010;26:266–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Price MN,
    2. Dehal PS,
    3. Arkin AP
    . FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PloS one 2010;5:e9490.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Price MN,
    2. Dehal PS,
    3. Arkin AP
    . FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol Biol Evolution 2009;26:1641–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Lozupone C,
    2. Hamady M,
    3. Knight R
    . UniFrac–an online tool for comparing microbial community diversity in a phylogenetic context. BMC Bioinformatics 2006;7:371.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Vazquez-Baeza Y,
    2. Pirrung M,
    3. Gonzalez A,
    4. Knight R
    . EMPeror: a tool for visualizing high-throughput microbial community data. Gigascience 2013;2:16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Langille MG,
    2. Zaneveld J,
    3. Caporaso JG,
    4. McDonald D,
    5. Knights D,
    6. Reyes JA,
    7. et al.
    Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nature Biotechnol 2013;31:814–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Oksanen Jari,
    2. Guillaume Blanchet F,
    3. Kindt Roeland,
    4. Legendre Pierre,
    5. Minchin Peter R,
    6. O'Hara R B,
    7. et al.
    (2015). vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.3-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
  31. 31.↵
    1. Holmes I,
    2. Harris K,
    3. Quince C
    . Dirichlet multinomial mixtures: generative models for microbial metagenomics. PLoS One 2012;7:e30126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Schloss PD,
    2. Westcott SL,
    3. Ryabin T,
    4. Hall JR,
    5. Hartmann M,
    6. Hollister EB,
    7. et al.
    Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009;75:7537–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Hayes A
    . Introduction to Mediation, Moderation and conditional process analysis. Chapter 4. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2013.
  34. 34.↵
    1. Segata N,
    2. Izard J,
    3. Waldron L,
    4. Gevers D,
    5. Miropolsky L,
    6. Garrett WS,
    7. et al.
    Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol 2011;12:R60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Love MI,
    2. Huber W,
    3. Anders S
    . Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 2014;15:550.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Brotman RM
    . Vaginal microbiome and sexually transmitted infections: an epidemiologic perspective. J Clin Invest 2011;121:4610–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Anahtar MN,
    2. Byrne EH,
    3. Doherty KE,
    4. Bowman BA,
    5. Yamamoto HS,
    6. Soumillon M,
    7. et al.
    Cervicovaginal bacteria are a major modulator of host inflammatory responses in the female genital tract. Immunity 2015;42, 965–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Hillier SL,
    2. Nugent RP,
    3. Eschenbach DA,
    4. Krohn MA,
    5. Gibbs RS,
    6. Martin DH,
    7. et al.
    Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1737–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Leitich H,
    2. Bodner-Adler B,
    3. Brunbauer M,
    4. Kaider A,
    5. Egarter C,
    6. Husslein P
    . Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for preterm delivery: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:139–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Wilks M,
    2. Wiggins R,
    3. Whiley A,
    4. Hennessy E,
    5. Warwick S,
    6. Porter H,
    7. et al.
    Identification and H(2)O(2) production of vaginal lactobacilli from pregnant women at high risk of preterm birth and relation with outcome. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:713–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Oh HY,
    2. Kim BS,
    3. Seo SS,
    4. Kong JS,
    5. Lee JK,
    6. Park SY,
    7. et al.
    The association of uterine cervical microbiota with an increased risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Korea. Clin Microbiol Infect 2015;21:674.e1–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. 42.↵
    1. Smith BC,
    2. McAndrew T,
    3. Chen Z,
    4. Harari A,
    5. Barris DM,
    6. Viswanathan S,
    7. et al.
    The cervical microbiome over 7 years and a comparison of methodologies for its characterization. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e40425.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Falsen E,
    2. Pascual C,
    3. Sjödén B,
    4. Ohlén M,
    5. Collins MD
    . Phenotypic and phylogenetic characterization of a novel Lactobacillus species from human sources: description of Lactobacillus iners sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999;49:217–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Witkin SS,
    2. Mendes-Soares H,
    3. Linhares IM,
    4. Jayaram A,
    5. Ledger WJ,
    6. Forney LJ
    . Influence of vaginal bacteria and D- and L-lactic acid isomers on vaginal extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer: implications for protection against upper genital tract infections. MBio. 2013;4:e00460–13.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Schirmer M,
    2. Ijaz UZ,
    3. D'Amore R,
    4. Hall N,
    5. Sloan WT,
    6. Quince C. Schirmer
    . Insight into biases and sequencing errors for amplicon sequencing with the Illumina MiSeq platform. Nucleic Acids Research 2015;43:e37.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Nakatsu G,
    2. Li X,
    3. Zhou H,
    4. Sheng J,
    5. Wong SH,
    6. Wu WK,
    7. et al.
    Gut mucosal microbiome across stages of colorectal carcinogenesis. Nat Commun 2015;6:8727.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Uchihashi M,
    2. Bergin I,
    3. Bassis C,
    4. Hashway S,
    5. Chai D,
    6. Bell J
    . Influence of age, reproductive cycling status, and menstruation on the vaginal microbiome in baboons (Papio anubis). Am J Primatol 2015;77:563–578.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Yooseph S,
    2. Kirkness EF,
    3. Tran TM,
    4. Harkins DM,
    5. Jones MB,
    6. Torralba MG,
    7. et al.
    Stool microbiota composition is associated with the prospective risk of Plasmodium falciparum infection. Bmc Genomics 2015;16:631.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Vandeputte D,
    2. Falony G,
    3. Vieira-Silva S,
    4. Tito RY,
    5. Joossens M,
    6. Raes J
    . Stool consistency is strongly associated with gut microbiota richness and composition, enterotypes and bacterial growth rates. Gut Microotia 2016;65:57–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. 50.↵
    1. Martin Morgan
    . DirichletMultinomial: Dirichlet-multinomial mixture model machine learning for microbiome data. R package version 1.12.1.
  51. 51.↵
    1. Ding T,
    2. Schloss PD
    . Dynamics and associations of microbial community types across the human body. Nature 2014;509:357–360.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Lakritz JR,
    2. Poutahidis T,
    3. Levkovich T,
    4. Varian BJ,
    5. Ibrahim YM,
    6. Chatzigiagkos A,
    7. et al.
    Beneficial bacteria stimulate host immune cells to counteract dietary and genetic predisposition to mammary cancer in mice. Int J Cancer 2014;135:529–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Szajewska H,
    2. Gyrczuk E,
    3. Horvath A
    . Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 for the management of infantile colic in breastfed infants: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2013;162:257–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    1. Wu N,
    2. Yang X,
    3. Zhang R,
    4. Li J,
    5. Xiao X,
    6. Hu Y,
    7. et al.
    Dysbiosis signature of fecal microbiota in colorectal cancer patients. Microb Ecol 2013;66:462–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Wexler HM
    . Bacteroides: the good, the bad, and the nitty-gritty. Clin Microbiol Rev 2007;20:593–621.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    1. Jalanka-Tuovinen J,
    2. Salonen A,
    3. Nikkilä J,
    4. Immonen O,
    5. Kekkonen R,
    6. Lahti L,
    7. et al.
    Intestinal microbiota in healthy adults: temporal analysis reveals individual and common core and relation to intestinal symptoms. PLoS One 2011;6:e23035.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    1. Tap J,
    2. Mondot S,
    3. Levenez F,
    4. Pelletier E,
    5. Caron C,
    6. Furet JP,
    7. et al.
    Towards the human intestinal microbiota phylogenetic core. Environ Microbiol 2009;11:2574–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. Lopetuso LR,
    2. Scaldaferri F,
    3. Petito V,
    4. Gasbarrini A
    . Commensal Clostridia: leading players in the maintenance of gut homeostasis. Gut Pathog. 2013;5:23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Schwabe RF,
    2. Jobin C
    . The microbiome and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2013;13:800–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    1. Gillet E,
    2. Meys JF,
    3. Verstraelen H,
    4. Bosire C,
    5. De Sutter P,
    6. Temmerman M,
    7. et al.
    Bacterial vaginosis is associated with uterine cervical human papillomavirus infection: a meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2011;11:10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. 61.↵
    1. Antonio MA,
    2. Rabe LK,
    3. Hillier SL
    . Colonization of the rectum by Lactobacillus species and decreased risk of bacterial vaginosis. J Infect Dis 2005;192:394–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. 62.↵
    1. El Aila NA,
    2. Tency I,
    3. Claeys G,
    4. Verstraelen H,
    5. Saerens B,
    6. Santiago GL,
    7. et al.
    Identification and genotyping of bacteria from paired vaginal and rectal samples from pregnant women indicates similarity between vaginal and rectal microflora. BMC Infect Dis 2009;9:167.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. 63.↵
    1. Petricevic L,
    2. Domig KJ,
    3. Nierscher FJ,
    4. Krondorfer I,
    5. Janitschek C,
    6. Kneifel W,
    7. et al.
    Characterisation of the oral, vaginal and rectal Lactobacillus flora in healthy pregnant and postmenopausal women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012;160:93–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. 64.↵
    1. Toyokuni S,
    2. Okamoto K,
    3. Yodoi J,
    4. Hiai H
    . Persistent oxidative stress in cancer. FEBS Lett. 1995;358:1–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. 65.↵
    1. Musarrat J,
    2. Arezina-Wilson J,
    3. Wani AA
    . Prognostic and aetiological relevance of 8-hydroxyguanosine in human breast carcinogenesis. Eur J Cancer 1996;32A:1209–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. 66.↵
    1. Matsui A,
    2. Ikeda T,
    3. Enomoto K,
    4. Hosoda K,
    5. Nakashima H,
    6. Omae K,
    7. et al.
    Increased formation of oxidative DNA damage, 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine, in human breast cancer tissue and its relationship to GSTP1 and COMT genotypes. Cancer Lett 2000;151:87–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. 67.↵
    1. Oliva MR,
    2. Ripoll F,
    3. Muñiz P,
    4. Iradi A,
    5. Trullenque R,
    6. Valls V,
    7. et al.
    Genetic alterations and oxidative metabolism in sporadic colorectal tumors from a Spanish community. Mol Carcinog. 1997;18:232–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. 68.↵
    1. Romano G,
    2. Sgambato A,
    3. Mancini R,
    4. Capelli G,
    5. Giovagnoli MR,
    6. Flamini G,
    7. et al.
    8-Hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine in cervical cells: correlation with grade of dysplasia and human papillomavirus infection. Carcinogenesis 2000;21:1143–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. 69.↵
    1. Visalli G,
    2. Riso R,
    3. Facciolà A,
    4. Mondello P,
    5. Caruso C,
    6. Picerno I,
    7. et al.
    Higher levels of oxidative DNA damage in cervical cells are correlated with the grade of dysplasia and HPV infection. J Med Virol 2016;88:336–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. 70.↵
    1. Neish AS
    . Redox signaling mediated by the gut microbiota. Free Radical Res 2013;47:950–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. 71.↵
    1. Garrett WS
    . Cancer and the microbiota. Science. 2015;348:80–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. 72.↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Wu RS,
    3. Fu W,
    4. Xu L,
    5. Lam PK
    . Production of reactive oxygen species and 8-hydroxy-2'deoxyguanosine in KB cells co-exposed to benzoa]pyrene and UV-A radiation. Chemosphere 2004;55:1303–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. 73.↵
    1. Louis P,
    2. Hold GL,
    3. Flint HJ
    . The gut microbiota, bacterial metabolites and colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Microbiol 2014;12:661–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. 74.↵
    1. Gray LR,
    2. Tompkins SC,
    3. Taylor EB
    . Regulation of pyruvate metabolism and human disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 2014;71:2577–604.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. 75.↵
    1. Andergassen U,
    2. Liesche F,
    3. Kölbl AC,
    4. Ilmer M,
    5. Hutter S,
    6. Friese K,
    7. Jeschke U
    . Glycosyltransferases as markers for early tumorigenesis. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:792672.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  76. 76.↵
    1. Piyathilake CJ,
    2. Macaluso M,
    3. Alvarez RD,
    4. Chen M,
    5. Badiga S,
    6. Siddiqui NR,
    7. et al.
    A higher degree of LINE-1 methylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, a one-carbon nutrient related epigenetic alteration, is associated with a lower risk of developing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Nutrition 2011;27:513–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. 77.↵
    1. Hill MJ
    . Intestinal flora and endogenous vitamin synthesis. Eur J Cancer Prev 1997;6:S43–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. 78.↵
    1. Rossi M,
    2. Amaretti A,
    3. Raimondi S
    . Folate production by probiotic bacteria. Nutrients 2011;3:118–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. 79.↵
    1. Magnúsdóttir S,
    2. Ravcheev D,
    3. de Crécy-Lagard V,
    4. Thiele I
    . Systematic genome assessment of B-vitamin biosynthesis suggests co-operation among gut microbes. Front Genet 2015;6:148.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  80. 80.↵
    1. Crott JW,
    2. Liu Z,
    3. Keyes MK,
    4. Choi SW,
    5. Jang H,
    6. Moyer MP,
    7. et al.
    Moderate folate depletion modulates the expression of selected genes involved in cell cycle, intracellular signaling and folate uptake in human colonic epithelial cell lines. J Nutr Biochem 2008;19:328–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. 81.↵
    1. Wu M,
    2. Gunning W,
    3. Ratnam M
    . Expression of folate receptor type alpha in relation to cell type, malignancy, and differentiation in ovary, uterus, and cervix. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:775–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. 82.↵
    1. Harper JW,
    2. Elledge SJ
    . The DNA damage response: ten years after. Mol Cell 2007;28:739–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Prevention Research: 9 (5)
May 2016
Volume 9, Issue 5
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Prevention Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cervical Microbiota Associated with Higher Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women Infected with High-Risk Human Papillomaviruses
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Prevention Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Prevention Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Cervical Microbiota Associated with Higher Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women Infected with High-Risk Human Papillomaviruses
Chandrika J. Piyathilake, Nicholas J. Ollberding, Ranjit Kumar, Maurizio Macaluso, Ronald D. Alvarez and Casey D. Morrow
Cancer Prev Res May 1 2016 (9) (5) 357-366; DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-15-0350

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cervical Microbiota Associated with Higher Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women Infected with High-Risk Human Papillomaviruses
Chandrika J. Piyathilake, Nicholas J. Ollberding, Ranjit Kumar, Maurizio Macaluso, Ronald D. Alvarez and Casey D. Morrow
Cancer Prev Res May 1 2016 (9) (5) 357-366; DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-15-0350
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • mt-sDNA Specificity in 45–49 Year-Olds
  • Targeting CD40 and PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibits OPL Progression to OSCC
  • Revisiting a clinical diagnosis of NF1 for other syndromes
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Prevention Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Prevention Research
eISSN: 1940-6215
ISSN: 1940-6207

Advertisement