Table 2.

Relative rates of Pap test utilization in FN women compared with AOM women

Unadjusted modelAdjusted modelAdjusted model with interaction
RR95% CIPRR95% CIPRR95% CIP value
EthnicityAOM1.000.251.000.0011.000.005
FN0.930.83–1.050.890.83–0.961.171.05–1.31
Area of residenceUrban1.000.131.000.00031.00<0.0001
North0.860.75–1.000.840.77–0.910.850.80–0.91
Rural0.960.83–1.120.950.88–1.041.000.94–1.06
Age group18–190.840.72–0.97<0.00010.830.73–0.95<0.00010.760.69–0.84<0.0001
20–241.001.001.00
25–291.030.89–1.201.030.91–1.171.101.00–1.22
30–390.920.80–1.070.910.81–1.031.030.94–1.13
40–490.820.71–0.940.810.71–0.910.960.87–1.05
50–590.680.59–0.780.660.58–0.750.850.78–0.94
60–690.520.45–0.600.500.44–0.570.690.63–0.76
Time period2003–20051.000.921.000.811.000.66
2006–20081.010.89–1.141.000.94–1.081.010.97–1.05
Interaction
 NorthAOM1.000.16
FN1.161.04–1.30
 RuralAOM1.00
FN1.080.97–1.21
 UrbanAOM1.00
FN1.171.05–1.31
 18–19AOM1.00<0.0001
FN1.371.22–1.53
 20–24AOM1.00
FN1.171.05–1.31
 25–29AOM1.00
FN1.040.93–1.16
 30–39AOM1.00
FN0.950.83–1.05
 40–49AOM1.00
FN0.840.75–0.93
 50–59AOM1.00
FN0.710.63–0.79
 60–69AOM1.00
FN0.590.52–0.66